Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

Alaska Airlines Announces Order for Six Boeing Next-Generation 737-900ERs

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Alaska Airlines Announces Order for Six Boeing Next-Generation 737-900ERs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2015, 8:33 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PDX USA
Programs: AS MVPG, AA, BA, SPG Gold, HHonors Gold, Hyatt Platinum, IHG, Hertz 5*
Posts: 690
PDX-MSP
PDX-EWR
PDX-ATL (the return of this route)
Would all be at the top of my wish list for new routes.
pdxasflyer is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2015, 9:10 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 103
dreaming for SAN-YVR. Not one direct flight!
damieniz1 is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2015, 10:25 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SLC
Programs: All the Programs...
Posts: 124
While I understand that the -400 is becoming disfavored by the flying public for the most part, replacing a -400 (or a -700) 1:1 with a -900ER, especially on thinner routes, means while we may have a shiny new plane, we will probably see less frequency to accommodate the increase in seats... I really like the -700 and wish they would keep them (and do the power/slim line, etc) for the thinner routes, such as xSLC or even xANC.
OO-SLC-CR9 is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2015, 10:42 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Programs: Airline Free Agent, Bonvoy Platinum, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,812
Hoping for a SEA-IND route.
Jimgotkp is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2015, 11:04 pm
  #20  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
Original Poster
Hilton Contributor BadgeIHG Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, HH Gold, Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium LTG, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 42,953
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's BB: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)

RDU from anywhere?

But its yet to be seen if this is a net replacement of aircraft with a 25% in seats, or an actual gain in aircraft count. Those 734 & 73G leases seem to keep extending
beckoa is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2015, 11:05 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Programs: AS MVPG75k
Posts: 32
Please PDX-EWR.

Stopped flying the Delta PDX-JFK direct due to MP changes this year. It's kind of a drag heading up to Seattle to get to EWR.
direwolfpdx is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2015, 11:53 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SFO, mostly
Posts: 2,204
I'm confused about what Alaska plans to do with the 737-700s and 400s. Are they going to be updated with the new seats/power/IFE? Seems like Alaska wants to create a unified customer experience, these planes need to be updated, unless Alaska is really planning on phasing them all out in 2 years.
sltlyamusd is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2015, 12:03 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 207
Originally Posted by damieniz1
dreaming for SAN-YVR. Not one direct flight!
Air Canada flew SAN-YVR nonstop for a while but discontinued it in 2013.
majortom421 is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2015, 1:02 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SFO, mostly
Posts: 2,204
Originally Posted by majortom421
Air Canada flew SAN-YVR nonstop for a while but discontinued it in 2013.
Alaska also flew this route in the mid-2000s.
sltlyamusd is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2015, 6:46 am
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Originally Posted by OO-SLC-CR9
While I understand that the -400 is becoming disfavored by the flying public for the most part, replacing a -400 (or a -700) 1:1 with a -900ER, especially on thinner routes, means while we may have a shiny new plane, we will probably see less frequency to accommodate the increase in seats.
That's not how it works.

-400/700 flights get ungauged to a -800; routinely full -800s move to -900s unless range or takeoff performance is a factor.
3Cforme is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2015, 10:02 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458
Originally Posted by OO-SLC-CR9
While I understand that the -400 is becoming disfavored by the flying public for the most part, replacing a -400 (or a -700) 1:1 with a -900ER, especially on thinner routes, means while we may have a shiny new plane, we will probably see less frequency to accommodate the increase in seats... I really like the -700 and wish they would keep them (and do the power/slim line, etc) for the thinner routes, such as xSLC or even xANC.
Basically, AS is saying that the total fuel cost of the -400 is exactly the same as a -900ER. The benefit of the -900ER is that it has 25% more seats. The labor cost of the -900ER will be somewhat higher because of the need for 1 more FA. So, if a route was profitable with the -400, it will likely be profitable with the -900ER despite the increase in seats.
formeraa is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2015, 10:14 am
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by ANC
AS doesnt really have a whole lot of cities left to fly to that are in range of a 737 and can provide the loads of a 737 from the Seattle market on a daily basis
YYZ, YUL?


Originally Posted by formeraa
Basically, AS is saying that the total fuel cost of the -400 is exactly the same as a -900ER. The benefit of the -900ER is that it has 25% more seats. The labor cost of the -900ER will be somewhat higher because of the need for 1 more FA. So, if a route was profitable with the -400, it will likely be profitable with the -900ER despite the increase in seats.
If the 400 is paid off and the 900ER has a car payment, that plays in as well.

I'm not disagreeing with AS's strategy -- they have a low cost structure and seem to be smart with expansion -- but there is a huge cost to new planes. The new plane obsession is what leveraged CO to the hilt and basically required that they merge.
channa is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2015, 10:30 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 229
Originally Posted by sltlyamusd
I'm confused about what Alaska plans to do with the 737-700s and 400s. Are they going to be updated with the new seats/power/IFE? Seems like Alaska wants to create a unified customer experience, these planes need to be updated, unless Alaska is really planning on phasing them all out in 2 years.
-400 and -700's are getting hand-me down 'new' seats from the -800 and -900's. No more super-cushy FC seats on the -400's which I'll miss...reminds me of the old 727's!

They'll be outfitted with the streaming entertainment (Alaska Beyond) along with the already-installed gogo wifi but will not be getting seat-power. Was on a -700 a couple of days ago with the streaming movies...love it!
HiFlyerAS is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2015, 11:00 am
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,395
Originally Posted by channa
.I'm not disagreeing with AS's strategy -- they have a low cost structure and seem to be smart with expansion -- but there is a huge cost to new planes. The new plane obsession is what leveraged CO to the hilt and basically required that they merge.
ALK has a pretty good balance sheet. They've pre-funded their pension program and they're generally smart about their operations. I wouldn't be terribly worried.

Now, if these were 787s or 777s...
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2015, 12:57 pm
  #30  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
Original Poster
Hilton Contributor BadgeIHG Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, HH Gold, Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium LTG, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 42,953
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's BB: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)

Originally Posted by HiFlyerAS
Originally Posted by sltlyamusd
I'm confused about what Alaska plans to do with the 737-700s and 400s. Are they going to be updated with the new seats/power/IFE? Seems like Alaska wants to create a unified customer experience, these planes need to be updated, unless Alaska is really planning on phasing them all out in 2 years.
-400 and -700's are getting hand-me down 'new' seats from the -800 and -900's. No more super-cushy FC seats on the -400's which I'll miss...reminds me of the old 727's!

They'll be outfitted with the streaming entertainment (Alaska Beyond) along with the already-installed gogo wifi but will not be getting seat-power. Was on a -700 a couple of days ago with the streaming movies...love it!
Glad to see 734's getting Alaska beyond servers (and tablets too right?).

I've noticed the 73H seats going into them too...like the adjustable headrests ^

And as these are shorter flights the lack of power isn't the end of the world for me.

These refinements seem to indicate the A/c will stick around for a bit longer.
beckoa is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.