The New Ultimate Seating Thread, version deux
#16
Join Date: May 2002
Location: seattle, wa.
Posts: 915
AirNZboy,
One question, why do you guys do the pre-landing 2nd service 3 hours before landing into AKL (NZ3 LAX-AKL)? It would be nice to let pax to sleep a bit longer, don't you think?
It was strange because usually on other airlines, we know when the 2nd service is served, we only have 2 hours ahead of us and by the time the service is done, we have about 45 mins to landing, not 1.5 hours with nothing to do and no video is shown either.
One question, why do you guys do the pre-landing 2nd service 3 hours before landing into AKL (NZ3 LAX-AKL)? It would be nice to let pax to sleep a bit longer, don't you think?
It was strange because usually on other airlines, we know when the 2nd service is served, we only have 2 hours ahead of us and by the time the service is done, we have about 45 mins to landing, not 1.5 hours with nothing to do and no video is shown either.
#19
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Programs: BA, Air NZ, Qantas
Posts: 183
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by SeaMeFly:
AirNZboy,
One question, why do you guys do the pre-landing 2nd service 3 hours before landing into AKL (NZ3 LAX-AKL)? It would be nice to let pax to sleep a bit longer, don't you think?....</font>
AirNZboy,
One question, why do you guys do the pre-landing 2nd service 3 hours before landing into AKL (NZ3 LAX-AKL)? It would be nice to let pax to sleep a bit longer, don't you think?....</font>
#20
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by air_boi:
On most daylight flights (which NZ3 Lax-Akl essentially is) where there are 2 main meal services, the inflight standard is for there to be 6 hours between the meal services. On these daylight flights, the passengers start to get irritable and begin asking for more food if not feed sooner. This differs to the longer night flights (NZ 1/5 Lax-Akl) where the passengers prefer to sleep and be woken for breakfast prior to arival.</font>
On most daylight flights (which NZ3 Lax-Akl essentially is) where there are 2 main meal services, the inflight standard is for there to be 6 hours between the meal services. On these daylight flights, the passengers start to get irritable and begin asking for more food if not feed sooner. This differs to the longer night flights (NZ 1/5 Lax-Akl) where the passengers prefer to sleep and be woken for breakfast prior to arival.</font>
I actually prefer this. On NZ3 the 11:30pm arrival time means a late dinner time, and on NZ1 the 5:30am means an early breakfast.
[This message has been edited by Kiwi Flyer (edited Dec 27, 2003).]
#21
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, US
Posts: 2,210
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by airnzboy:
You can get seat assignments by contacting NZ directly. A few points to bear in mind..
</font>
You can get seat assignments by contacting NZ directly. A few points to bear in mind..
- Certain rows can only be assigned to Star Alliance Gold or Silver members.
</font>
#22
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by glg:
I'm going to be in coach on a 763 in March and am *G (UA). What rows are held? Exit? Is 19 my best bet?</font>
I'm going to be in coach on a 763 in March and am *G (UA). What rows are held? Exit? Is 19 my best bet?</font>
#23
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, US
Posts: 2,210
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Kiwi Flyer:
Glg, you can see this in the seatmap in NZ's booking engine. Not airnzboy's link above, but where you make a (dummy) booking and select seats. They are marked as premium (coloured green).</font>
Glg, you can see this in the seatmap in NZ's booking engine. Not airnzboy's link above, but where you make a (dummy) booking and select seats. They are marked as premium (coloured green).</font>
Okay, did that. I notice the greens at the front of the cabin (looks like 8-11), but exit row isn't available. Can that not be prebooked or would one need to prove status to see it at all? On ua.com, you can't see availability if you aren't at least Premier Exec (*G), wondering if that's the case here too.
Thanks!
#24
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SYD
Programs: Too many golds, no plat: OZ*G, AC*G, NZ*G, VA Gold, QF Gold, HH Gold, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 5,350
Just thought I'd contribute some info on the puddlejumpers (i.e. Beech 1900Ds) that occurred to me on my recent flights in and out of Blenheim.
- Rows 1 and 2 have no windows, so avoid them if you are a view junkie. However they do have some good points: Seat 2A has the most legroom on the plane, as there is no seat 1A; and seat 1F has a pretty good view into the cockpit if you're interested in watching the pilots at work.
- Row 3 is my pick for most unobstructed view: any further back and your view becomes obstructed by wing and engines
- The exit rows have no additional room compared to the others
- It's worth knowing in advance that there are no overhead lockers, so all carry-on has to fit in the (small) space under the seat in front
Nice features of the 1900s are the tall cabin (even lanky ol' me can stand up straight) and the individual air vents, which are very effective.
Also, a couple of impressions of the A320: both times I've flown it (on different a/c each time) I've been in the second exit row at 12F. As far as I could see, the legroom / personal space in the exit rows is identical to the other rows. Row 11, the first exit row, is best avoided due to non-reclining seats. On the whole it's a great aircraft but I did notice that on descent, there was condensation between the two layers of the window which ruined the view - on the first a/c, this problem seemed to be confined just to my seat but on the second a/c it appeared that a number of the other windows were also fogged, so I'm not sure if this is just an exit-row problem. I did notice extra noise coming from the overwing exit itself (wind noise etc) so I'd advise trying to get one of the seats further forward, especially since service starts from the front and it seems slower than it used to be.
Still on the subject of seating, but off on a bit of a tangent: will AirNZ cheerfully block off middle seats for *G's? I've never asked, but since I'm a window seat boy and the other half loves aisles, it would be handy to have the middle seat blocked...
- Rows 1 and 2 have no windows, so avoid them if you are a view junkie. However they do have some good points: Seat 2A has the most legroom on the plane, as there is no seat 1A; and seat 1F has a pretty good view into the cockpit if you're interested in watching the pilots at work.
- Row 3 is my pick for most unobstructed view: any further back and your view becomes obstructed by wing and engines
- The exit rows have no additional room compared to the others
- It's worth knowing in advance that there are no overhead lockers, so all carry-on has to fit in the (small) space under the seat in front
Nice features of the 1900s are the tall cabin (even lanky ol' me can stand up straight) and the individual air vents, which are very effective.
Also, a couple of impressions of the A320: both times I've flown it (on different a/c each time) I've been in the second exit row at 12F. As far as I could see, the legroom / personal space in the exit rows is identical to the other rows. Row 11, the first exit row, is best avoided due to non-reclining seats. On the whole it's a great aircraft but I did notice that on descent, there was condensation between the two layers of the window which ruined the view - on the first a/c, this problem seemed to be confined just to my seat but on the second a/c it appeared that a number of the other windows were also fogged, so I'm not sure if this is just an exit-row problem. I did notice extra noise coming from the overwing exit itself (wind noise etc) so I'd advise trying to get one of the seats further forward, especially since service starts from the front and it seems slower than it used to be.
Still on the subject of seating, but off on a bit of a tangent: will AirNZ cheerfully block off middle seats for *G's? I've never asked, but since I'm a window seat boy and the other half loves aisles, it would be handy to have the middle seat blocked...
#25
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SYD
Programs: Too many golds, no plat: OZ*G, AC*G, NZ*G, VA Gold, QF Gold, HH Gold, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 5,350
By the way, just noticed a slight mistake in airnzboy's otherwise excellent and comprehensive seating information above - the business class seat width is shown as being the same in 744/763/762. In fact the seats are wider in the 747 and 737 (international config) than the 763 and 762, due to AirNZ's decision to install 2+2+2 seating in the 763/2. I'm not sure whether the 19.5" width refers to the wider or the narrower seats...
#26
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by mad_atta:
Just thought I'd contribute some info on the puddlejumpers (i.e. Beech 1900Ds) that occurred to me on my recent flights in and out of Blenheim.
- Rows 1 and 2 have no windows, so avoid them if you are a view junkie. However they do have some good points: Seat 2A has the most legroom on the plane, as there is no seat 1A; and seat 1F has a pretty good view into the cockpit if you're interested in watching the pilots at work.
- Row 3 is my pick for most unobstructed view: any further back and your view becomes obstructed by wing and engines
- The exit rows have no additional room compared to the others
- It's worth knowing in advance that there are no overhead lockers, so all carry-on has to fit in the (small) space under the seat in front
Nice features of the 1900s are the tall cabin (even lanky ol' me can stand up straight) and the individual air vents, which are very effective.</font>
Just thought I'd contribute some info on the puddlejumpers (i.e. Beech 1900Ds) that occurred to me on my recent flights in and out of Blenheim.
- Rows 1 and 2 have no windows, so avoid them if you are a view junkie. However they do have some good points: Seat 2A has the most legroom on the plane, as there is no seat 1A; and seat 1F has a pretty good view into the cockpit if you're interested in watching the pilots at work.
- Row 3 is my pick for most unobstructed view: any further back and your view becomes obstructed by wing and engines
- The exit rows have no additional room compared to the others
- It's worth knowing in advance that there are no overhead lockers, so all carry-on has to fit in the (small) space under the seat in front
Nice features of the 1900s are the tall cabin (even lanky ol' me can stand up straight) and the individual air vents, which are very effective.</font>
Digressing, but I love the baggage service at the smaller centres. In many cases the bags are ready outside before you even make it out of the terminal.
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by mad_atta:
Also, a couple of impressions of the A320: both times I've flown it (on different a/c each time) I've been in the second exit row at 12F. As far as I could see, the legroom / personal space in the exit rows is identical to the other rows. Row 11, the first exit row, is best avoided due to non-reclining seats. On the whole it's a great aircraft but I did notice that on descent, there was condensation between the two layers of the window which ruined the view - on the first a/c, this problem seemed to be confined just to my seat but on the second a/c it appeared that a number of the other windows were also fogged, so I'm not sure if this is just an exit-row problem. I did notice extra noise coming from the overwing exit itself (wind noise etc) so I'd advise trying to get one of the seats further forward, especially since service starts from the front and it seems slower than it used to be.</font>
Also, a couple of impressions of the A320: both times I've flown it (on different a/c each time) I've been in the second exit row at 12F. As far as I could see, the legroom / personal space in the exit rows is identical to the other rows. Row 11, the first exit row, is best avoided due to non-reclining seats. On the whole it's a great aircraft but I did notice that on descent, there was condensation between the two layers of the window which ruined the view - on the first a/c, this problem seemed to be confined just to my seat but on the second a/c it appeared that a number of the other windows were also fogged, so I'm not sure if this is just an exit-row problem. I did notice extra noise coming from the overwing exit itself (wind noise etc) so I'd advise trying to get one of the seats further forward, especially since service starts from the front and it seems slower than it used to be.</font>
#28
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 218
airnzboy
Just wondering if you have any onfo on LHR to AKL route with the proposed larger economy seating layout.
I read somewhere that NZ may drop First class and do some sort of enhanced economy cabin, like Virgin do.
Any info?
Just wondering if you have any onfo on LHR to AKL route with the proposed larger economy seating layout.
I read somewhere that NZ may drop First class and do some sort of enhanced economy cabin, like Virgin do.
Any info?
#29
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SYD
Programs: Too many golds, no plat: OZ*G, AC*G, NZ*G, VA Gold, QF Gold, HH Gold, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 5,350
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Kiwi Flyer:
The planes to Nelson etc (the Metroliner I think rather than the Saab??) also have no bins, carry on under the seat. There have been a few times mine didnt fit (despite having deliberately taken smaller carry on than usual on the main routes) </font>
The planes to Nelson etc (the Metroliner I think rather than the Saab??) also have no bins, carry on under the seat. There have been a few times mine didnt fit (despite having deliberately taken smaller carry on than usual on the main routes) </font>
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/151356/M/
#30
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by mad_atta:
All the Metroliners and Bandeirantes are gone from the domestic fleet (as of early to mid last year I think) and AFAIK the Saabs are the smallest aircraft operated to Nelson. The Saabs do have some overhead locker space but it is pretty limited, as the lockers only run down one side of the cabin and are pretty shallow to begin with:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/151356/M/</font>
All the Metroliners and Bandeirantes are gone from the domestic fleet (as of early to mid last year I think) and AFAIK the Saabs are the smallest aircraft operated to Nelson. The Saabs do have some overhead locker space but it is pretty limited, as the lockers only run down one side of the cabin and are pretty shallow to begin with:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/151356/M/</font>