Try for SE or change to another FF program.
Apr 14, 2006 | 9:41 am
#46
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: YUL-YQB-BTV
Programs: SPG-Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,356
[QUOTE=yyzprincess]
Nothing.
Maybe I should clarify my posting .
I was just comparing and pointing out the negative postings by Parnel about SQ's Product and the way it was received on this AC forum to when negative opinions of AC product are posted by the members of this FT Board who in most cases are not UA apologists but AC: SE,E,P only these posters are subjected to rude offensive responses from Parnel.
I have edited.
After apologizing to Randy on behalf of all Canadians few months ago 
, now you want to defend everybody against Parnel?
Don't you have anything better to do, like posting positive criticisims ?
BTW, I have not received anything from your lawyer as of yet...
Originally Posted by acysb87
Nothing.
Maybe I should clarify my posting .
I was just comparing and pointing out the negative postings by Parnel about SQ's Product and the way it was received on this AC forum to when negative opinions of AC product are posted by the members of this FT Board who in most cases are not UA apologists but AC: SE,E,P only these posters are subjected to rude offensive responses from Parnel.
I have edited.
, now you want to defend everybody against Parnel? Don't you have anything better to do, like posting positive criticisims ?
BTW, I have not received anything from your lawyer as of yet...
Apr 14, 2006 | 10:29 am
#47
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Shanghai
Programs: CX Diamond, HH Diamond, A-Club Gold, Hyatt Platinum, Shangri-la Jade, Intercon Gold Ambassador
Posts: 1,370
Originally Posted by yyzprincess
I spent weeks researching the PPS program.
Where have I heard that before -- again, the implicit message here is everyone else is an idiot apart from me and you had better listen to me because I have done research
Apr 14, 2006 | 10:53 am
#48
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: YVR
Programs: AC MM
Posts: 1,478
Originally Posted by ACORD
Have you considered getting status on OneWorld as well as * Alliance?
If you travel a lot to Asia, the cities and routes you frequent the most will dictate which airline makes the most sense to get status on. For instance, if your base is HKG then you'll really want Cathay status (even Silver @ 30K status miles gives you lounge access). If you travel to MNL the *Alliance is pretty useless as you need to take crazy routes to get there and still earn status miles. If your base is BKK or SIN then *Alliance makes sense.
BTW -- I find Air Canada just as good as CX, SQ and TG crossing the Pacific when travelling in J.
If you travel a lot to Asia, the cities and routes you frequent the most will dictate which airline makes the most sense to get status on. For instance, if your base is HKG then you'll really want Cathay status (even Silver @ 30K status miles gives you lounge access). If you travel to MNL the *Alliance is pretty useless as you need to take crazy routes to get there and still earn status miles. If your base is BKK or SIN then *Alliance makes sense.
BTW -- I find Air Canada just as good as CX, SQ and TG crossing the Pacific when travelling in J.
OneWorld carriers, especially CX, don't seem to have the kind of fares in C that *A carriers have, especially between SE Asia and N.America.
Apr 14, 2006 | 3:42 pm
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,099
[QUOTE=yyzprincess]
Nothing.
Maybe I should clarify my posting .
I was just comparing and pointing out the negative postings by Parnel about SQ's Product and the way it was received on this AC forum to when negative opinions of AC product are posted by the members of this FT Board who in most cases are not UA apologists but AC: SE,E,P only these posters are subjected to rude offensive responses from Parnel.
I have edited.
Ahhh,got it.Appreciate the clarification.
Originally Posted by acysb87
Nothing.
Maybe I should clarify my posting .
I was just comparing and pointing out the negative postings by Parnel about SQ's Product and the way it was received on this AC forum to when negative opinions of AC product are posted by the members of this FT Board who in most cases are not UA apologists but AC: SE,E,P only these posters are subjected to rude offensive responses from Parnel.
I have edited.
Ahhh,got it.Appreciate the clarification.
Apr 14, 2006 | 5:36 pm
#50
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: YYZ
Programs: ACMM SE UA2MM Marriott Lifetime Tite Titanium
Posts: 4,472
[QUOTE=Super Larry]
After apologizing to Randy on behalf of all Canadians few months ago , now you want to defend everybody against Parnel?
Don't you have anything better to do, like posting positive criticisims ?
BTW, I have not received anything from your lawyer as of yet...
I was just pointing two type of responses to Parnel.
1. When posters dare to disagree with Parnel,they are subjected to offensive & rude replies by Parnel.
2.When Parnel disagrees no poster subjects Parnel to offensive & rude replies.
And I posted "It is unfortunate, you have not extended the same courtesy to those of us who dare to express negative opinion of AC product."
Pointing this out is defending everybody against Parnel?
Correct me if I am wrong.
Is it not the spirit of this board for posters to express their opinions without having to be subjected to offensive & rude replies by one particular poster?
Originally Posted by yyzprincess
After apologizing to Randy on behalf of all Canadians few months ago
, now you want to defend everybody against Parnel? Don't you have anything better to do, like posting positive criticisims ?
BTW, I have not received anything from your lawyer as of yet...
1. When posters dare to disagree with Parnel,they are subjected to offensive & rude replies by Parnel.
2.When Parnel disagrees no poster subjects Parnel to offensive & rude replies.
And I posted "It is unfortunate, you have not extended the same courtesy to those of us who dare to express negative opinion of AC product."
Pointing this out is defending everybody against Parnel?
Correct me if I am wrong.
Is it not the spirit of this board for posters to express their opinions without having to be subjected to offensive & rude replies by one particular poster?
Apr 14, 2006 | 6:21 pm
#54
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YYZ/YOW
Programs: AC SE 2MM * DL MM * HH Diamond * Marriott Lifetime Titanium * Queen's '92
Posts: 5,986
Originally Posted by yyzprincess
Is it not the spirit of this board for posters to express their opinions without having to be subjected to offensive & rude replies by one particular poster?
(a) to talk about AC/AE flying, points, and miles;
(b) to talk about Random Canadiana
It is not:
(a) to talk repetitively about other airlines' programs;
(b) to talk repetitively about other posters and complain about their posting habits, nor to goad or bait other posters who you may not like.
Simon
Apr 14, 2006 | 6:36 pm
#55
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: YYZ
Programs: ACMM SE UA2MM Marriott Lifetime Tite Titanium
Posts: 4,472
Originally Posted by Simon
Actually, the spirit of this board is:
(a) to talk about AC/AE flying, points, and miles;
(b) to talk about Random Canadiana
It is not:
(a) to talk repetitively about other airlines' programs;
(b) to talk repetitively about other posters and complain about their posting habits, nor to goad or bait other posters who you may not like.
Simon
(a) to talk about AC/AE flying, points, and miles;
(b) to talk about Random Canadiana
It is not:
(a) to talk repetitively about other airlines' programs;
(b) to talk repetitively about other posters and complain about their posting habits, nor to goad or bait other posters who you may not like.
Simon
On this thread, before I posted, the said poster threw personal attacks on another poster because he dare to offer another option beside AC FFP. Is it asking too much of this poster to reply without personal attacks.
The poster in question continues to do as he pleases. The poster views this forum as his domain. This is not the poster's domain,he is Randy's guest.
Several times you have pointed out that my posting(s) were incorrect or out of line.
I have modified them & apologize if I have offended you.Because I am Randy's guest. And one does not throw personal attacks, use offensive & rude language to other guests in the host's house.
Last edited by yyzprincess; Apr 14, 2006 at 6:44 pm
Apr 14, 2006 | 7:03 pm
#57
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YYZ/YOW
Programs: AC SE 2MM * DL MM * HH Diamond * Marriott Lifetime Titanium * Queen's '92
Posts: 5,986
Originally Posted by yyzprincess
To share information on other programs.
On this thread, before I posted, the said poster threw personal attacks on another poster because he dare to offer another option beside AC FFP. Is it asking too much of this poster to reply without personal attacks.
The poster in question continues to do as he pleases. The poster views this forum as his domain. This is not the poster's domain,he is Randy's guest.
The poster in question continues to do as he pleases. The poster views this forum as his domain. This is not the poster's domain,he is Randy's guest.
It is Randy's house, leave the moderating to Randy. PM him if you want. Stop filling up threads with your war against another poster!
......ouch!
Apr 14, 2006 | 7:43 pm
#59
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: YYC
Programs: AC Basic, UA MP Gold, Marriott Gold Elite, SPG Gold, Amex Platinum
Posts: 3,012
Since we came off the rails a few posts ago.....
Originally Posted by Parnel
There are other benefits that are quietly given that also make it worthwhile.
Originally Posted by Doc Fraud
we'll have to take away your key to the SE massage room.
Originally Posted by Parnel
I feel the kinks already
Apr 14, 2006 | 7:46 pm
#60
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 8,573
How about United ......ouch!
=aw