Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Disillusioned with eupgrade program

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Disillusioned with eupgrade program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 7:32 pm
  #136  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YTZ
Programs: AC SE, Hyatt Platinum, SPG Gold, Priority Club Gold
Posts: 487
Originally Posted by Sopwith
I have to agree. I commented a few weeks ago that the system is designed to leave unused credits at the end of the year. The arithmetic clearly leads to this conclusion, however another poster suggested I was being obtuse, inferring that AC would never dream of engaging in such contrived and calculated subterfuge. It seems clear to me that the way the arithmetic works out is no accident.
With a bit of planning I should end up with zero in both my account and Mrs. Lynchpin_yyz's account (she isn't travelling much this year so she's generously sponsering me). She started with 45, I started with 35, and she'll certainly hit zero. Of course YMMV.
lynchpin_yyz is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 8:52 pm
  #137  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa (YOW)
Posts: 407
Originally Posted by Souvlaki
Clearly we need an authoritative, comprehensive FAQ to deal with this. I'm inclined to start on it but it's complicated and I just don't have the knowledge to complete it myself. There are too many complicating factors (what are the many possible tie-breakers between 2 SE's vying for 1 last seat, etc.) As you point out, the value of the nomination benefit hangs on how the upgrades are prioritized.
+1!!! omg, a wiki on how to upgrade and how to use the eupgrade system is definitely in need. this thread is so confusing.
cuto is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 11:06 pm
  #138  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 25,036
Originally Posted by cuto
+1!!! omg, a wiki on how to upgrade and how to use the eupgrade system is definitely in need. this thread is so confusing.
Arguably a good thing.

At least for those of us who figured it out.
Stranger is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 11:19 pm
  #139  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: YQR
Programs: AC*E35 and decreasing
Posts: 666
Originally Posted by fin 645
I still don't have an answer to my previously posted questions, viz:

"At airport WL time, it seems very possible that I (as an E) could get upgraded but not my spouse (no status). From what has been posted here, I can't refuse the upgrade without paying any Y fare difference and losing my seat next to my spouse. Right? AC - not good for relationships! Can an escape clause be built in? Would a sensible GA ask me first? Can I put my spouse in the J seat instead of me?"
Andrew explicitly addressed that situation in post #100.
tinchote is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 6:46 am
  #140  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,170
Originally Posted by Stranger
How long ago was that? It currently seems that gate agents no longer have much latitude to help their friends anymore.

(Could have been high level AC executives. But I would think in more recent times they would be smart enough not to let themselves indulge in this either.)
Yes, it was a few years ago but once bitten twice shy.

It was the way how AC handled it that upset me to this day.

Learnt from it and started a work around plan to avoid similar situation for myself. Worked well. However, buying Latitude on international routes to secure an instant upgrade is something of the past now with the cheap Z fare on AC and freqently even cheaper discount business class fares on other airlines.
Clipper801 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 7:07 am
  #141  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Programs: *G
Posts: 2,304
Originally Posted by tinchote
Andrew explicitly addressed that situation in post #100.
Thank you for the responses telling me that if I decline one upgrade (mine) at the gate because my travel companion (read spouse) is not upgraded, I will not have to pay the fare difference to go back to Y. Agreed.

But the rest of my scenario remains, ie, losing the preferred seat next to my wife or upgrading without her unless the GA recognizes the problem and asks if "we" want one upgrade or leave things as they were. However sensible I think that is, it's obviously not in AC's sights.

Post 100 also says that nothing has changed in the changeover from certs to eupgrades, which I accept, along with the realization that I have never in fact done a 4 day upgrade for both of us before. So as the flight approaches when we will try this out, I am merely curious as to how it works.

I have upgraded both of us many times in the past using Latitude fares and instant upgrades. I have not done that this year (and don't have any plans to), which may be one of the unintended consequences of AC's eupgrade program (essentially more travel and status for us at the same cost as before, even if there are less upgrades).
fin 645 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 7:26 pm
  #142  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Programs: AC*SE
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by Andrew Yiu
Let's hope this one clears it up:

Prior to departure day:

- If SE and basic on the same PNR, both will get SE priority on the reservation waitlist and you will only clear if there are 2 R seats and you're next on the list.

- If SE sponsors a basic on a seperate PNR, the basic member will NOT get SE priority on the reservation waitlist.

Airport waitlist:

- EVERYONE clear according to their own status. There's no such thing as guest of SE ranking higher than guest of E.

And we have a very comprehensive audit process in place especially since the introduction of eUpgrades so the chances of a GA jumping the list is very very unlikely.
Andrew, i dont want to challenge you but it seems to me that the following excerpt taken directly from AC.com contradicts your interpretation:
"The eligibility criteria (for the upgrades) that apply to your Top Tier status will be the same for your eUpgrade nominee."
There is no fine print.
No distinctions are made on the "transferred" upgrade eligibility criteria morphing pre or post departure day; no warning that a nominee travelling on a separate PNR foregoes those priviledges for the reservation waitlist.
Mouser2000 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 8:01 pm
  #143  
Company Representative - Air Canada
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Canada
Posts: 24,224
Originally Posted by Mouser2000
Andrew, i dont want to challenge you but it seems to me that the following excerpt taken directly from AC.com contradicts your interpretation:
"The eligibility criteria (for the upgrades) that apply to your Top Tier status will be the same for your eUpgrade nominee."
There is no fine print.
No distinctions are made on the "transferred" upgrade eligibility criteria morphing pre or post departure day; no warning that a nominee travelling on a separate PNR foregoes those priviledges for the reservation waitlist.
Eligibility criteria = eligible fare classes + when you can upgrade; it doesn't have anything to do with the business rules of how we clear upgrades (which I can't post the full details other than what I've mentioned above).
Andrew Yiu is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 9:21 pm
  #144  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG (mind in YYZ)
Programs: MPC Green, AC Tangerine :)
Posts: 1,102
Originally Posted by Andrew Yiu
Eligibility criteria = eligible fare classes + when you can upgrade; it doesn't have anything to do with the business rules of how we clear upgrades (which I can't post the full details other than what I've mentioned above).
would be great if you could post the full details, but clarification regarding your post on #127 (if you can)

airport waitlist is the one that gets resorted from the reservation waitlist which is now moved over?

and i guess the waitlist is then moved to the gate after check-in closes where there's no more different fare classes (and one could refuse the upgrade if their companion can't be moved together without paying the fare difference)
wwtsang is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 1:52 am
  #145  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Programs: AC*SE
Posts: 2,515
Originally Posted by Andrew Yiu
Eligibility criteria = eligible fare classes + when you can upgrade; it doesn't have anything to do with the business rules of how we clear upgrades (which I can't post the full details other than what I've mentioned above).
So, Andrew, this means that people we nominate receive the advantage of upgrading on the fare classes we can (the same for everyone anyway), and then our upgrade booking window however, their placement on the wait list isn't connected to the nominating member's status at all?

So, if I nominate a basic member then waitlist them at 7 days they have the advantage of being on the list 3 days before any Elite members or anyone that they nominate which means they may be cleared into R by AC in advance of the 4 day window, otherwise they will compete with the Elite members+nominees?

I think that makes sense, although the wbsite certainly gave the impression that the people we nominate continue on as having our status. By the sounds of it, this systems would work out well for nominating colleagues/family/friends who have their own status but not so much for those that are basic members.
CdnFlier is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 8:04 am
  #146  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG (mind in YYZ)
Programs: MPC Green, AC Tangerine :)
Posts: 1,102
Originally Posted by Andrew Yiu
Prior to departure day:

- If SE sponsors a basic on a seperate PNR, the basic member will NOT get SE priority on the reservation waitlist.
if SE sponsors an E, will the E be on the reservation waitlist as an E? or as a guest of SE and rank lower than an E?
wwtsang is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 8:53 am
  #147  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: AC*SE MM, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold, IHG Dia RA
Posts: 3,487
Originally Posted by wwtsang
if SE sponsors an E, will the E be on the reservation waitlist as an E? or as a guest of SE and rank lower than an E?
I interpret Andrew's responses as that if you're on a waitlist without being attached to someone else's PNR you are ranked by your own status. So for your scenario (E nominated by SE) they will be ranked as an E, not a basic.
Tax Dude is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2012 | 9:37 am
  #148  
Original Member
40 Countries Visited
2M
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Canada
Programs: AC SE 2MM, HH Dd, Bonvoy G; IC S; AA; DL
Posts: 14,496
Thought I would revisit disillusionment since I thought there would be more issues than there have been.

I think eupgrades have worked OK.

Only beefs I have are a few IT issues (usually able to overcome--e.g. problems with using 2 eupgrade accounts on same PNR) and lack of rolling 12 month window but even that hasn't really affected me. Hope to get rid of my credits and most of my partner's expiring 2012 credits by Feb 28 and then start new year with a big whack through judicious planning and good luck.:-:

over the last year have burned 26 credits from my partner's account and 117 from mine. Hope to use last of 2012 expiring ones (54 mine and 19 partner's) as well as start burning 2013 expiring ones on upcoming Argentina/Arizona trips.

So for 2012-2013, it is currently 137 eupgrade credits for me and 35 for her to start off 2013. She was only Prestige last year but made Elite for 2012 so will make hers even easier for me to use for domestic flying this year.

Summary:

Upgraded from FROM MY ACCOUNT

YUL-YVR
YYC-YVR
YOW-YUL-YYC
YUL-YVR
YOW-YUL-YYC
LGA-YYZ-YYC FOR TWO
YYC-YVR-HKG FOR TWO
HKG-YVR-YYC FOR TWO
YYC-YUL-CDG FOR TWO
CDG-YUL-YYC FOR TWO
YYC-YOW
YOW-YYC

Upgraded FROM SO ACCOUNT (all my flying domestically):

YVR-YUL
YYC-YVR
YVR-YOW-YUL
YVR-YUL-YOW
YYC-YOW
YOW-YYC
YYC-YEG (Yes really!)
YYC-YVR
YUL-YVR
YYC-YVR

Only missed upgrade request once on YVR-YOW flight that I had no choice due to other tight connections (could have flown otherwise on different route/time). All cleared by flight time although once they had to come and get me from the back of the plane to move me up.^

Tricks of the trade:
  • Use my SE status to confirm upgrades
  • If lots of R space and booking fare class at 4 days, cancel and use partner's credits
  • Split PNRs when travelling on same ticket when can't upgrade at 7 day window so I can upgrade partner first then SE priority kicks in day of flight
  • Use One-way tickets to avoid IT problems (where possible, works great on domestic
but not so great on transoceanic where Saturday stay required).

Other tricks I am aware of but not used (keep checking for R space on day of since there are issues with upgrades not clearing and going to unintended parties over SEs!)

Last edited by BlondeBomber; Jan 3, 2012 at 9:42 am
BlondeBomber is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2012 | 10:44 am
  #149  
20 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: YWG
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 1,505
Originally Posted by BlondeBomber
...I think eupgrades have worked OK.

Tricks of the trade:
  • Use my SE status to confirm upgrades
  • If lots of R space and booking fare class at 4 days, cancel and use partner's credits
  • Split PNRs when travelling on same ticket when can't upgrade at 7 day window so I can upgrade partner first then SE priority kicks in day of flight
  • Use One-way tickets to avoid IT problems (where possible, works great on domestic
but not so great on transoceanic where Saturday stay required).

Other tricks I am aware of but not used (keep checking for R space on day of since there are issues with upgrades not clearing and going to unintended parties over SEs!)
great summary- and similar experience to mine.
not sure if the 'R on day of' has been dealt with as I haven't seen it during my holiday flights.
canolakid is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2012 | 11:14 am
  #150  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,161
Originally Posted by Sopwith
I have to agree. I commented a few weeks ago that the system is designed to leave unused credits at the end of the year. The arithmetic clearly leads to this conclusion, however another poster suggested I was being obtuse, inferring that AC would never dream of engaging in such contrived and calculated subterfuge. It seems clear to me that the way the arithmetic works out is no accident.
Having leftover fractions in your account encourages you to fly.

"If I just get this next tier, I will get 15 eUps, plus the 3 left in my account, then I can upgrade a long haul international... hmmm."

This kind of thing.

If you work it down to zero, you have less incentive to fly than if you feel you can extract a bit of extra value from the account.

I think this is the reasoning behind the awards and charges being very difficult to balance to zero.
tyberius is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.