Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Disillusioned with eupgrade program

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Disillusioned with eupgrade program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 5:46 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: AC E
Posts: 644
Originally Posted by lcohen999
No offence, but purchase date is a terrible way to do it. The system they have now does offer the perks depending on fare paid.

Latitude, R and your good or you are put on the list, then the SEs join that list at the 7 day rule for T+, etc. etc....and coming down to the wire, all gets resorted by status, fare class, etc. It does make sense and is fare..I think

The exact our of upgrade kind of sucks when you have a west coast red eye and are still in the east when you have to call in an upgrade.

but....there are worst things in life that getting up for 2 minutes to upgrade and rolling over to go back to sleep
Huh? What I proposed would work just like the current system, except that (a) you wouldn't have to jump online at a certain time to submit your upgrade request, and (b) when the window opens, upgrades would go to whoever bought their ticket first, rather than whoever has Internet access handy at that moment.

I did not suggest any change to the instant Lat upgrade; Lat/T+ is currently the only difference in when you can upgrade. I did not suggest any change to the number of eUpgrade credits that would be required.

Originally Posted by D582
But again, what would be the point of the windows? Sure, your upgrade would not clear until the 'window time' but given how tightly AC controls R space on many routes, there might not be any R inventory prior to the T+ windows anyways.

You're suggesting yet another list, with yet another set of priority rules. If it would be based on the time the ticket is purchased, then if that list would fill up to the # of J seats physically on the plane at like 6-8 months out with let's say all SE, then there would be absolutely no chance for a SE who bought a ticket closer to the date from getting an upgrade, let alone an E or a P, and that's hardly fair.

Plus this would erode the 'instant upgrade request' benefit from those that purchase Latitude fares
Your question about the purpose of the windows applies equally to the current system. If R is full when a window opens, people get added to the waitlist. Same thing would happen in the system I proposed, except they would be automatically added to the waitlist.

How would the list fill up 68 months out? Upgrades would still cost credits; not everyone would request an upgrade. The same number of people would request upgrades as do now, except they could request it at time of purchase, and it would be processed automatically when their window opens.

The overall effect would be the same as if, under the current system, all the T+ pax who wanted to upgrade tried to do it as soon as their window opened, and the tiebreaker for who would get the upgrades (since they'd all be requested at the same time) is ticket purchase date. I think ticket purchase date is much fairer than "whoever has Internet handy and a few minutes free at a certain moment" (which is the current system).
klparrot is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 7:52 pm
  #17  
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: AC SE, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,363
Originally Posted by klparrot
Huh? What I proposed would work just like the current system, except that (a) you wouldn't have to jump online at a certain time to submit your upgrade request, and (b) when the window opens, upgrades would go to whoever bought their ticket first, rather than whoever has Internet access handy at that moment.
This means I'd probably never get upgraded on a lot of routes, as most of my travel is last minute, so I whole-heartedly disagree with using purchase date as a deciding mechanism. The 7 day window levels the playing field between everyone who could potentially upgrade.
hjohnson is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 8:45 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: UA MP
Posts: 768
Originally Posted by D582
given how tightly AC controls R space on many routes, there might not be any R inventory prior to the T+ windows anyways.
I'm not sure that's true. I have upgraded TATL lat tickets twice this year with available R space and I have also tracked the R space on a few TATL flights - they do open up more often than not well before the T+ windows.

Additionally, just because you see R0 all the time doesn't necessarily mean someone with lat ticket didn't get their upgrade cleared - it's quite possible that AC silently releases an R seat to clear a lat ticket on the waitlist without you ever seeing R goes above 0.
g46r is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 8:48 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: UA MP
Posts: 768
Originally Posted by FrequentFlyerYYZ
I just gave the system a bit of a stress test - bought a Lat TATL ticket, moved it five times and then had to cancel it outright (all thanks to a disorganized client).
This could be a fun exercise - find a TATL or TPAC with R0 that is at least a month or two out, buy a lat ticket and get on the waitlist, wait until a day or so before the T+ window and see if AC releases an R seat to clear your upgrade before the T+ window. Cancel your ticket and get a refund once your curiosity is satisfied.
g46r is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 9:58 pm
  #20  
500k
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Erstwhile Accidental AC E35K
Posts: 3,194
Originally Posted by tomvancouver
Taking the math a bit further....

If the eupgrades were given out in units of 12 instead of 10 or 15, and then the pricing for eupgrades could be 1,2,3,4,6,12 with 'likely' more useful bits left over at the end of the year

17 for a long haul upgrade is a prime number. 14 dosen't divide too well either!
I have to agree. I commented a few weeks ago that the system is designed to leave unused credits at the end of the year. The arithmetic clearly leads to this conclusion, however another poster suggested I was being obtuse, inferring that AC would never dream of engaging in such contrived and calculated subterfuge. It seems clear to me that the way the arithmetic works out is no accident.
Sopwith is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 10:04 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: UA MP
Posts: 768
Originally Posted by Sopwith
I have to agree. I commented a few weeks ago that the system is designed to leave unused credits at the end of the year. The arithmetic clearly leads to this conclusion, however another poster suggested I was being obtuse, inferring that AC would never dream of engaging in such contrived and calculated subterfuge. It seems clear to me that the way the arithmetic works out is no accident.
When it first came out, it was 20 credits to upgrade a long haul flight from lower booking class T+ flight.

The situation now isn't that much different from having a handful of NAU or SWU left at the end of last year (why couldn't they give you a few more SSWU in exchange of zero SWU/NAU, you could have argued).
g46r is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 10:13 pm
  #22  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Earth
Programs: AC S100K (formerly AC*SE), AC 2MM, AMEX Plat, Marriott Platinum Elite
Posts: 1,468
I would personally like the upgrade window to be n days + 4 hours. This is because I am on the same flights every week. For me to register in time means requiring wi-fi access on the plane.

Just a thought.
2MM_Guy is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 12:47 am
  #23  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: Aeroplan
Posts: 1,022
Originally Posted by lcohen999
I would really agree with the last part. I have a red eye coming home from LAS next Saturday on an M fare. So if i want to book on the microsecond, I need to be up at 2:20am to get on the list.

Aside from that, I don't mind it too much. After a long two weeks of travel, I decided to upgrade my T+ YUL-YOW at the last second. Wouldn't have used a SSWU, but to burn a few credits (about to cross 40k soon any ways) was well worth it (plus the new food in J is excellent and was a decent replacement for not eating dinner).
--------
The field will still be level. When you book and request an upgrade it is in the system. When your window opens, the system processes your request automatically. Who gets in first can be a random pick. Right now priority is perhaps random when everyone gets out his/her Blackberry at microsecond t to request an upgrade.
Lllahim is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 8:07 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Left
Programs: FT
Posts: 7,281
Originally Posted by Lllahim
----------

You did not ask if the Z are booked with AC.
exactly, Z fares via ORD to HKG on UA are mighty attractive from time to time and UA's product is actually nice to HKG....most certainly competative with AC's.
mkjr is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 9:46 am
  #25  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Programs: AS MVP Gold; AE; AA Platinum; Club Carlson Gold; SPG Gold; HHonorsGold, Accor Platinum
Posts: 227
Originally Posted by pxy_a
+1!

I would rather wake up at odd hours of the night to request the upgrade to influence my order in the waitlist vs. letting the computer do it for me.
I totally agree!
yvrluver is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 10:17 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat, RBC Avion
Posts: 150
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FF_Consultant is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 10:24 am
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 18,453
Originally Posted by 2MM_Guy
I would personally like the upgrade window to be n days + 4 hours. This is because I am on the same flights every week. For me to register in time means requiring wi-fi access on the plane.
You could ask someone to do it for you at the appointed hour.
The Lev is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 2:29 pm
  #28  
10 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: *G^2, Bonvoyed, NEXUS
Posts: 3,678
Originally Posted by klparrot
How would the list fill up 68 months out? Upgrades would still cost credits; not everyone would request an upgrade. The same number of people would request upgrades as do now, except they could request it at time of purchase, and it would be processed automatically when their window opens.

The overall effect would be the same as if, under the current system, all the T+ pax who wanted to upgrade tried to do it as soon as their window opened, and the tiebreaker for who would get the upgrades (since they'd all be requested at the same time) is ticket purchase date. I think ticket purchase date is much fairer than "whoever has Internet handy and a few minutes free at a certain moment" (which is the current system).
The list could absolutely fill up 6-8 months before. Think of routes like YYZ-HKG or YVR-SYD where you have a lot of people wanting to upgrade, and not a lot of upgrade opportunities. Also, say just prior to the SE window, there was R3. That would mean that 3 SE who bought a cheap K or L ticket 6 months ago and requested an upgrade then will get upgraded over the one who bought their M ticket yesterday. Why would AC even want to do that from a financial perspective? Now yes, under the current system, the first 3 SE to request and get their upgrade could be the ones who bought their cheap tickets a while ago, but at least the SE who bought their (expensive) M ticket yesterday has an equal opportunity for the upgrade.

Originally Posted by hjohnson
This means I'd probably never get upgraded on a lot of routes, as most of my travel is last minute, so I whole-heartedly disagree with using purchase date as a deciding mechanism. The 7 day window levels the playing field between everyone who could potentially upgrade.
+1. Exactly my point.
D582 is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 7:06 pm
  #29  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Earth
Programs: AC S100K (formerly AC*SE), AC 2MM, AMEX Plat, Marriott Platinum Elite
Posts: 1,468
Originally Posted by The Lev
You could ask someone to do it for you at the appointed hour.
I need to train one of the progeny (a way to earn some extra allowance).
2MM_Guy is offline  
Old Apr 2, 2011 | 5:09 am
  #30  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PHL, NYC, DC
Posts: 9,763
since i sit in front of a computer for 16 hours a day, i should provide an assistance service eh?

Just name, Aeroplan #, Booking Reference, Flight/Time of departure and I will work my magic
global happy traveller is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.