Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

ADVICE NEEDED: LH not honoring UA MP mileage award

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

ADVICE NEEDED: LH not honoring UA MP mileage award

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2013, 2:13 pm
  #31  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 26
Matter now resolved- LH wins, but happy w/UA

While LH was patently unfair and the senior management "arrogant" (this according to the senior UA who assisted me), the matter has been brought to a resolution a few minutes ago.

UA contacted me to inform me she had a conf call w/LH USA and Frankfurt people who basically said "NO", they will not reinstate, but will "waitlist" me. They admitted to UA that the waitlist was a pretty poor chance to come through. UA said thanks but no thanks and terminated the call. UA admitted to me that this was a pretty unprofessional encounter and was herself not happy w/LH at all.

She happily accommodated me on my choice of UA metal, so I selected LAX-SFO-FRA on the early eve departure for a 3pm arrival in FRA on their 744 in C class. All forward seats taken on the upper deck except for aisle in front of the restrooms (first row), so I selected that seat as opposed to facing "backwards".

Thanks to all of you who wrote in offering advice , I really LOVE FlyerTalk!
jkellyplan is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 2:13 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by Boghopper
If you can't get the new business class on LH, take the SFO-FRA option, or maybe from IAH if that's the CO BF seats.
I think it is insane to go from SFO to FRA via IAH instead of direct from SFO.

Originally Posted by jkellyplan
While LH was patently unfair and the senior management "arrogant" (this according to the senior UA who assisted me), the matter has been brought to a resolution a few minutes ago.

UA contacted me to inform me she had a conf call w/LH USA and Frankfurt people who basically said "NO", they will not reinstate, but will "waitlist" me. They admitted to UA that the waitlist was a pretty poor chance to come through. UA said thanks but no thanks and terminated the call. UA admitted to me that this was a pretty unprofessional encounter and was herself not happy w/LH at all.

She happily accommodated me on my choice of UA metal, so I selected LAX-SFO-FRA on the early eve departure for a 3pm arrival in FRA on their 744 in C class. All forward seats taken on the upper deck except for aisle in front of the restrooms (first row), so I selected that seat as opposed to facing "backwards".

Thanks to all of you who wrote in offering advice , I really LOVE FlyerTalk!
Thank you for following up with us.

There have been endless posts here from people who have described failures in SHARES that result in UA messing up bookings with partners.

To understand the "arrogance" of LH, I'd suggest that you put on their shoes. They probably get several hundred calls every day from UA agents trying to blame LH for what really is a UA problem.

Also it never was clear to me that they ever confirmed. Did they confirm and give you a PNR then pull it back? Or, did they just not confirm what you requested in the first place?

Last edited by iluv2fly; May 3, 2013 at 3:56 pm Reason: merge
FlyWorld is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 2:48 pm
  #33  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 26
LH issued PNR and took it back but wouldn't explain why to UA is what I was told. I think that is why UA worked as hard on this as they did.
jkellyplan is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 2:58 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by jkellyplan
LH issued PNR and took it back but wouldn't explain why to UA is what I was told. I think that is why UA worked as hard on this as they did.
But you never saw the PNR and you never logged into LH web site with the PNR so you don't know if that's true, right?
FlyWorld is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 3:03 pm
  #35  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 26
I just am repeating what UA told me
jkellyplan is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 3:07 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: BOS/ORH
Programs: AS 75K
Posts: 18,323
Originally Posted by Often1
Although silly & outmoded, LH has 72 hours to confirm a tentatively booked seat. LH is known for taking the 72 hours, although UA & LH are not only in the same alliance, sometimes codeshare and sometimes revenue share.
How about when you book 1 or 2 days in advance? Im hoping LH space opens up on my trip at the end of the month. Id hate to lose my existing GF seat because my new flight does not get confirmed in LH system
CDKing is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 3:16 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by jkellyplan
I just am repeating what UA told me
Understood. I'm just questioning what they told you.

We all know that LH might not confirm in the 72 hour window.

Has anyone here had experience where they did confirm, they issued a PNR, and then they clawed it back?
FlyWorld is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 3:34 pm
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 12,482
Originally Posted by jkellyplan
LH issued PNR and took it back but wouldn't explain why to UA is what I was told. I think that is why UA worked as hard on this as they did.
Originally Posted by mitchmu
But you never saw the PNR and you never logged into LH web site with the PNR so you don't know if that's true, right?
LH computer will immediately generate a PNR based on request from UA computer. The question is if the status was ever confirmed (HK)? It could have been NN, PN, RQ or UC without ever been HKed. Then, you never really had a seat on LH and LH never confirmed you (which is different from what the thread title implies). In other words, you were too late to the party and someone else grabbed the LH seat. UA computer didn't update in time and incorrectly showed seat being available.

UA worked as hard as you said because UA screwed up, not LH. UA agent should have advised you that you need to call back in 24 hours to confirm as it is an interline booking and status is not real time. Again, this applies to interline revenue booking as well. Although revenue classes are usually available and less of a problem. It is really no fault of LH but simply limitation of interline computer booking.

UA, although not admitting fault, made good for you. All is well now.

Last edited by TerryK; May 3, 2013 at 9:00 pm
TerryK is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 3:42 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: US
Programs: AA/UA/DL
Posts: 2,773
Originally Posted by mitchmu
Understood. I'm just questioning what they told you.

We all know that LH might not confirm in the 72 hour window.

Has anyone here had experience where they did confirm, they issued a PNR, and then they clawed it back?
I have another concern that is about SHARES....

My friend had a ticket on UA/CA and CA had never received the ticket number,
no matter how many times UA agents reissued this ticket.
CA said they had never received and canceled the segment.
At the end, the solution was to go to UA ticket office in Beijing to pick up the
paper ticket when transiting. (he had overnight layover)

I had an award ticket issued by UA and travel on OZ/CA.
I called to change one segment and turned out the other 2 segments were
disappeared. I called UA again but they couldn't force OZ to open seats.
In addition, the new ticket should be from PVG. When I arrived at PVG, the reservation showed SHA.

I have been protected on DL twice on revenue tickets.
Both time they said the tickets had been reissued and I just needed to
show up at DL check in counter to check in.
Both time DL said they didn't have a ticket attached with the reservation.
I needed to go back and forth between DL and UA counter many times.

The other thread points out that UA has problem to book BR award.
This might be caused by BR system but it might be caused by SHARES.

Not to mention that many people report that one or more of their segments on partner airline dropped.

The other story was from points guy that he had problem with LX award ticket issued by UA. (My friend travel with LX many times by US airways' miles without any problem)
http://thepointsguy.com/2012/09/my-s...wiss-airlines/

channa has stories about this kind issue back to pmCO

I am more concerned about the truth....
That's why I suggested OP to have conference call with both airlines to figure out what exactly happened.
Are all these caused by SHARES or they are all partner airlines' fault??

Last edited by pigx5; May 3, 2013 at 3:47 pm
pigx5 is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 3:59 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Crystal City, VA
Programs: United Mileage Plus 1K 2 MM, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt Platinum
Posts: 2,627
I had a similar issue to the OP with LH. I was booked DXB-FRA (LH, C), FRA-IAD on UA (GF) award.

Finally the DXB-FRA opened up with F on LH. I got UA to change that segment.

Checking with the LH website, never saw the change to F. Called LH, no idea about it.

Called UA, on hold, they couldn't make it work with LH, so they put me in GF on the DXB-IAD non-stop. That was nice.
mauiUAflyer is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 4:51 pm
  #41  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by mitchmu
I re-read OP. It sounds like a seat was open then UA tried to book it but someone else snagged it first. A collision case. Maybe?
Couldn't be. When you request the space, it comes back confirmed or unconfirmed (instantly). If someone snagged it a split second before you did, it would come back unconfirmed.

Since the OP had it confirmed on his or her ticket, and the ticket is issued with that segment, UA is responsible for flying you for that segment.

We can talk all we want about glitches and SHARES and interconnection, but if that flight coupon is on the ticket, it's a ticket, and if LH is not seeing it, UA must do what's needed to fix it.

In most cases, offering up UA space will be a sufficient remedy, but the OP seems intent on flying LH, so they can push until UA books them into LH revenue.


Originally Posted by mitchmu
But you never saw the PNR and you never logged into LH web site with the PNR so you don't know if that's true, right?
Doesn't matter. UA got a confirmation from LH and ticketed it. The OP has a ticket, that's all that matters.


Originally Posted by pigx5
My friend had a ticket on UA/CA and CA had never received the ticket number,
no matter how many times UA agents reissued this ticket.
CA said they had never received and canceled the segment.
At the end, the solution was to go to UA ticket office in Beijing to pick up the
paper ticket when transiting. (he had overnight layover)
Another option would be to feed CA the ticket number. Sometimes they can pull it up and manually attach it.

I've had to do that with a post-SHARES UA-issued ticket for some flights on NZ.


Originally Posted by pigx5
I had an award ticket issued by UA and travel on OZ/CA.
I called to change one segment and turned out the other 2 segments were
disappeared. I called UA again but they couldn't force OZ to open seats.
In addition, the new ticket should be from PVG. When I arrived at PVG, the reservation showed SHA.
Yes, the dropped segment thing has been happening for years with SHARES, well back in the CO days.


Originally Posted by pigx5
I have been protected on DL twice on revenue tickets.
Both time they said the tickets had been reissued and I just needed to
show up at DL check in counter to check in.
Both time DL said they didn't have a ticket attached with the reservation.
I needed to go back and forth between DL and UA counter many times.
Yes, post-3/3, I always call DL before leaving the UA area to make sure it's good (or try to smartphone checkin via the DL app).


Originally Posted by pigx5
The other thread points out that UA has problem to book BR award.
This might be caused by BR system but it might be caused by SHARES.
I think this is different, since it used to work reasonably reliably before BR's system cutover. I think the interface hasn't been reestablished since BR made their changes.


Originally Posted by pigx5
I am more concerned about the truth....
That's why I suggested OP to have conference call with both airlines to figure out what exactly happened.
Are all these caused by SHARES or they are all partner airlines' fault??
The common denominator is CO's systems. These problems didn't really happen on PMUA until they went to SHARES. They happened on CO before the cutover, and they're happening now on UA.

The ONLY time I ever had something similar on UA was with a SA segment that UA showed as dropped. But a call to SAA verified the segment was still in tact, it just stopped showing on UA's side. So the severity and impact of the issue was merely cosmetic, whereas with SHARES, space is truly getting dropped.

That's why I think a conference call wouldn't produce the desired results. CO is not going to want to disclose they screwed up. LH, however may be willing to point a finger at CO. So as I suggested before, the OP should call LH directly and try to find an agent willing to figure out what happened. Once I did that with LX in my CO-dropped LX flight, that's when I was able to get CO to acknowledge their systems did it, and then I was able to get them to force me on LX in a revenue class as a remedy.
channa is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 4:58 pm
  #42  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Nowhere does OP say that he had a ticket. All he says is:

"I received an e-mail confirmation shortly after my call ".

The question is whether OP received an e-ticket receipt, not whether he received an itinerary or other communication.

It's unclear that this was ticketed and given that LH had 72 hours to confirm space, it's unlikely that it was ticketed.
Often1 is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 8:51 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: US
Programs: AA/UA/DL
Posts: 2,773
Originally Posted by Often1
Nowhere does OP say that he had a ticket. All he says is:

"I received an e-mail confirmation shortly after my call ".

The question is whether OP received an e-ticket receipt, not whether he received an itinerary or other communication.

It's unclear that this was ticketed and given that LH had 72 hours to confirm space, it's unlikely that it was ticketed.
I think more important is that this happens too many times already.
He is not the only one in this situation.
pigx5 is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 9:39 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: AA Plat, IHG Plat, HH Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Hertz Gold
Posts: 1,933
Originally Posted by jkellyplan
All forward seats taken on the upper deck except for aisle in front of the restrooms (first row), so I selected that seat as opposed to facing "backwards".
I wouldn't necessarily count out the rear-facing seats so easily. There are many here (including myself) who prefer the rear-facing seats to the forward facing ones.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...g-j-seats.html
Antipode is offline  
Old May 3, 2013, 10:07 pm
  #45  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,461
Glad to hear United took care of you Should be a very pleasant flight. The backwards facing seats on the upper deck do get lots of recommendations. I'll test that out in 15K SFO-HKG next month.
Kacee is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.