Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > SAS | EuroBonus
Reload this Page >

LN-RKP ferried from Chile to Toulouse [merged non-retrofitted A340 thread]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LN-RKP ferried from Chile to Toulouse [merged non-retrofitted A340 thread]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2017, 2:20 am
  #256  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by wazow
I entirely understand that this is unacceptable. This is not a comment about SK, but about my travel habits. I *never* count on the airline keeping me busy in flight. I always plan work, reading, entertainment myself, and only use IFE as a backup. Am I over-preparing?
I always have back up IFE with me, with about 4 long haul flights per month, though a lot of night flights, I often run out of interesting content. So coming to a dark plane would not cause an issue. Though I'll happily accept a few miles as compensation....
CPH-Flyer is online now  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 6:08 am
  #257  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferable @30.000 feet
Programs: More than one
Posts: 1,673
Originally Posted by Nairb_
Had exactly the same experience Friday evening EWR-CPH. Does anyone have a good email or physical address to send SAS a note. It was terrible, they didn't tell anyone prior to boarding, and the FAs were apologetic, because they knew they were delivering a substandard experience.
Go to the SAS website and use the contact forms there. After moving to the new website. They actually works even when I don't add my EB number.
highupinthesky is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 6:17 am
  #258  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferable @30.000 feet
Programs: More than one
Posts: 1,673
Originally Posted by VFR2EWR
Unfortunately had this dog from CPH-EWR a few months back. Worse than I expected. The in-seat entertainment system didn't work... on any seat. They passed out tablets to business class which tells me they knew nothing worked before we boarded but didn't tell anyone. People who didnt have a book were losing their minds - had SAS informed us prior to departure passengers could have picked something up at the airport. Instead most were left playing tic tac toe on napkins for 9.5 hours.

What a disgrace.
That must have been an awful flight. Normally the total flight time incl. taxi etc. for CPH-EWR is 8.5 hours or less.
highupinthesky is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 6:20 am
  #259  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferable @30.000 feet
Programs: More than one
Posts: 1,673
Originally Posted by OFFlyer
Very true - wonder why I have not noticed that. Maybe the pure joy of 9 hours without e-mail overflowing my inbox :-)
If I could keep my inbox from overflowing just by being offline, I would do that more often, but the e-mails seems to be ganging up on me, so as soon as I get online again, they all stand ready and jump me at the same time. :-(
highupinthesky is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 6:31 am
  #260  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferable @30.000 feet
Programs: More than one
Posts: 1,673
Originally Posted by fassy
You are just wrong. All LH planes have exactly the same standard J cabin (plus minus two or three years of age).

The only thing is that some planes have lost the first cabin. And then LH doesn't sell First on those flights or accomendates passengers which have booked F well ahead of time.

As I said, the very least is to be a bit apologetic and help perhaps offer some compensation. SK misses on both and that makes me angry...
Well. It's just a couple of months ago, where I was on a LH bird where the IFE and other interior was very worn and of older dates.
Also if you look at LH's fleet of A340's you will see they have a couple of 20+ year old birds. I wouldn't be surprised if they are spare planes used the same way as LN-RKP.
highupinthesky is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 6:43 pm
  #261  
RJ1
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 622
Originally Posted by CPH-Flyer
I always have back up IFE with me, with about 4 long haul flights per month, though a lot of night flights, I often run out of interesting content. So coming to a dark plane would not cause an issue. Though I'll happily accept a few miles as compensation....
Sadly, there is renewed talk about an expanded ban of larger electronics on flights from Europe to the US. If this bird continues to be used on US routes, and if the ban is expanded, I would hope that SAS would invest in a repair of the IFE system.
RJ1 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 9:44 pm
  #262  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by RJ1
Sadly, there is renewed talk about an expanded ban of larger electronics on flights from Europe to the US. If this bird continues to be used on US routes, and if the ban is expanded, I would hope that SAS would invest in a repair of the IFE system.
I don't use my laptop for IFE, tvougj should my tablet be banned as well I am behind on my books.... My tablet is pretty slim and lightweight, so not included under the current rules.
CPH-Flyer is online now  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 12:44 am
  #263  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,184
Originally Posted by highupinthesky
Well. It's just a couple of months ago, where I was on a LH bird where the IFE and other interior was very worn and of older dates.
Also if you look at LH's fleet of A340's you will see they have a couple of 20+ year old birds. I wouldn't be surprised if they are spare planes used the same way as LN-RKP.
Nope, no spares in the LH fleet. The 20+ year old A343s got a new interior in 2012-14.
oliver2002 is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 8:53 am
  #264  
RJ1
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 622
Originally Posted by CPH-Flyer
I don't use my laptop for IFE, tvougj should my tablet be banned as well I am behind on my books.... My tablet is pretty slim and lightweight, so not included under the current rules.
Good for you on your tablet if it falls under the current guidelines, pasted below from the TSA website. Your tablet must be fairly small. What brand? May need to get one!

Large Electronic Devices

Electronic devices larger than a cell phone/smart phone will not be allowed to be carried onboard the aircraft in carry-on luggage or other accessible property. Electronic devices that exceed this size limit must be secured in checked luggage. Necessary medical devices will be allowed to remain in a passenger’s possession after they are screened.

The approximate size of a commonly available smartphone is considered to be a guideline for passengers. Examples of large electronic devices that will not be allowed in the cabin on affected flights include, but are not limited to:

Laptops
Tablets
E-Readers
Cameras
Portable DVD players
Electronic game units larger than a smartphone
Travel printers/scanners
RJ1 is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 2:35 pm
  #265  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferable @30.000 feet
Programs: More than one
Posts: 1,673
Originally Posted by oliver2002
Nope, no spares in the LH fleet. The 20+ year old A343s got a new interior in 2012-14.
Well. I'm 200% sure I was on a 330 or 340 LH bird around March this year, which definitely didn't have new interior, nor a fully functional IFE at all seats. But I had a pretty tight travel schedule, so I didn't make a note about which bird it was.
highupinthesky is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 5:00 pm
  #266  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by RJ1
Good for you on your tablet if it falls under the current guidelines, pasted below from the TSA website. Your tablet must be fairly small. What brand? May need to get one!

Large Electronic Devices

Electronic devices larger than a cell phone/smart phone will not be allowed to be carried onboard the aircraft in carry-on luggage or other accessible property. Electronic devices that exceed this size limit must be secured in checked luggage. Necessary medical devices will be allowed to remain in a passenger’s possession after they are screened.

The approximate size of a commonly available smartphone is considered to be a guideline for passengers. Examples of large electronic devices that will not be allowed in the cabin on affected flights include, but are not limited to:

Laptops
Tablets
E-Readers
Cameras
Portable DVD players
Electronic game units larger than a smartphone
Travel printers/scanners
I was sure I read some specific measurements at a point that gave me reason to be relaxed about my tablet. But this wonderfully inspecific definition allows them to ban almost anything, and probably even some of the larger smartphones. "The approximate size of a commonly available smartphone" WTH?

Under this guideline, I would be stuck with books or my phone.... :-(
CPH-Flyer is online now  
Old Jun 13, 2017, 1:55 am
  #267  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 5,979
Not a chance, anything larger than a ~5" smart phone is not allowed.

just keep my fingers crossed they don't extend this nonsense to European flights.

Last edited by fassy; Jun 13, 2017 at 3:57 am
fassy is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2017, 3:25 am
  #268  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,935
Originally Posted by fassy
Not a chance, anything larger than a ~5" smart phone is not allowed.

just keep my fingers crossed they extend this nonsense to European flights.
We probably need to cross a whole lot of other things with the rationale of the current US administration. But we do know it will be "Yuge"
FT Guest xyzpdq is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2017, 1:36 pm
  #269  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Koala Lemur
Programs: SK EBD LTG (*G)
Posts: 2,447
Not having a laptop on board is totally manageable for me. For effective 4-5 hours of work on a TATL flight, I can keep myself with printed materials easily. The issue is unreliability of luggage handling. Not having a laptop on arrival, or having a broken laptop on arrival, is entirely unacceptable. This takes me out of work for several days, including completely missing the point of the trip. If this ban is extended, I will consider joining the crowd of people who by principle don't travel to US.

(an additional nuisance is the need to check bags, that often extends the duration of the trip by good half an hour; not mentioning how additional inconvenience at entry point on connecting flights).
SK2751 is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2017, 3:05 pm
  #270  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: BOM-SIN-EWR
Programs: UA*G (1K again), Sixt Plat, *was*: SQ QPP01 & SK EBS/EBG, LH SEN, AA EXP, 9wPlat
Posts: 8,606
LN-RKP appears to be a real workhorse!

Practically flying (mainline) routes every day...

Last edited by SuperFlyBoy; Jun 17, 2017 at 3:35 pm
SuperFlyBoy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.