Organized resistance to WBI/invasive patdowns
#407
Join Date: May 2010
Location: FLL - Nice and Warm
Programs: TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 1,025
Wear this button - Generate some comments !
Available at:
http://www.zazzle.com/airport_body_s...74163315218819
Available at:
http://www.zazzle.com/airport_body_s...74163315218819
#409
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,790
Is anyone interested/able to adapt the nude-o-scope brochure for the UK situation? Since opting out is not an option in the UK, it needs a different emphasis.
Any ideas?
Any ideas?
#411
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
#412
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,790
There are small changes necessary for a UK version, such as changing "TSA" throughout the document to "Department for Transport" or "DfT" (except, of course, for the reference to Rolando Negrin.)
The reference to a FOIA request in the middle column of the second page, and the reference to "Ivy League" poster images are (probably) inappropriate for a UK audience.
But those are superficial and straightforward.
The main (obvious) goal of the US brochure is to get passengers to opt out. A lot of the text, particularly the large font and the conclusions, informs them of their right to do so, and the implications of the patdown alternative. (There are of course broader goals of educating the public about the TSA's strategy, etc. In my case, I am working on one I can give to people thinking of visiting to the US so they can decide if they even want to go.)
Since UK passengers are (at this time, as I understand it) less likely to encounter a nude-o-scope but have no "opt out" choice, what message could we convey with a brochure? I really am looking for ideas, particularly from those who have experience at LHR or MAN. What is useful to say to people as they stand in line?
As I mentioned in another thread, I have friends going to LHR soon and I can give them the current brochure for the pictures, etc, but it's not something they can (easily) pass on to others in the UK context.
The reference to a FOIA request in the middle column of the second page, and the reference to "Ivy League" poster images are (probably) inappropriate for a UK audience.
But those are superficial and straightforward.
The main (obvious) goal of the US brochure is to get passengers to opt out. A lot of the text, particularly the large font and the conclusions, informs them of their right to do so, and the implications of the patdown alternative. (There are of course broader goals of educating the public about the TSA's strategy, etc. In my case, I am working on one I can give to people thinking of visiting to the US so they can decide if they even want to go.)
Since UK passengers are (at this time, as I understand it) less likely to encounter a nude-o-scope but have no "opt out" choice, what message could we convey with a brochure? I really am looking for ideas, particularly from those who have experience at LHR or MAN. What is useful to say to people as they stand in line?
As I mentioned in another thread, I have friends going to LHR soon and I can give them the current brochure for the pictures, etc, but it's not something they can (easily) pass on to others in the UK context.
#413
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 346
Wear this button - Generate some comments !
Available at:
http://www.zazzle.com/airport_body_s...74163315218819
Available at:
http://www.zazzle.com/airport_body_s...74163315218819
#414
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of ORD
Programs: AA Plat UA Premier
Posts: 9,154
Today at ORD AA preferred line the Nude - O -Scopes were not in use! There was tape across the front of it! And there was a line much longer than normal.
Is it too much to hope it is broken? Could the NOS possibly be unreliable like the puffer machines?
Is it too much to hope it is broken? Could the NOS possibly be unreliable like the puffer machines?
#415
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
#416
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: DL, WN, US, Avis, AA
Posts: 662
a suggestion for the brochures
I suggest that the brochures be revised to include a picture of the WBI device (perhaps as the cover image for the versions with no cover image). I think that a lot of occasional travelers will not register the difference between the WTMD and the WBI. At least one version of the brochure should be explicitly aimed at the infrequent flier.
#417
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
I suggest that the brochures be revised to include a picture of the WBI device (perhaps as the cover image for the versions with no cover image). I think that a lot of occasional travelers will not register the difference between the WTMD and the WBI. At least one version of the brochure should be explicitly aimed at the infrequent flier.
L3 ProVision (MMW) (image linked here since it is listed as available for direct download from the manufacturer website)
Rapiscan Secure 1000 (did not provide an image, since the images are not available for open download on the manufacturer website)
#418
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
beyond a lack of accuracy and a certain ease in going haywire, as detected by the operators,
#419
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
#420
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Has TSA once again bought extremely expensive gear without fully testing and understanding what they signed off on?
TSA is its very short life has wasted more tax monies than most other agencies combined.