NYTimes: "Amex, Challenged by Chase, Is Losing the Snob War"
#91
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,680
The folks at Amex clearly think that the reason people are going for the CSR is the benefits (travel credit, Priority Pass, etc) and not the points for spend. I think they are misguided. I hold the CSR for the bonus points. The benefits are only there to offset the annual fee; I'd get the CSR even if it had no annual fee and no travel credit and no Priority Pass. But here's what I don't get: even if we do assume that people are getting the CSR for the benefits, why does Amex give us benefits that are annoying, difficult, or impossible to use? The new Uber credit, broken up into $15 increments that must be used or lost each month, is a good example of this.
#92
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
The folks at Amex clearly think that the reason people are going for the CSR is the benefits (travel credit, Priority Pass, etc) and not the points for spend. I think they are misguided. I hold the CSR for the bonus points. The benefits are only there to offset the annual fee; I'd get the CSR even if it had no annual fee and no travel credit and no Priority Pass. But here's what I don't get: even if we do assume that people are getting the CSR for the benefits, why does Amex give us benefits that are annoying, difficult, or impossible to use? The new Uber credit, broken up into $15 increments that must be used or lost each month, is a good example of this.
#94
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SAN
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, American Air, National Car
Posts: 1,131
AMEX is making things ("benefits") way too hard ... the plenti network is worthwhile, but I have to login to the website on a full size browser (few people want to do that vs mobile app) , then somehow navigate to the plenti exchange (this takes effort) and enter several verifications (vs a fingerprint verification on a mobile app) ... it's a waste of time to get my 1% credit
No one wants to have their time wasted
No one wants to have their time wasted
#95
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL
Programs: DL DM/MM; Hilton Diamond; National Exec
Posts: 273
+1. Outside of the US, I find AmEx hard to be accepted to the point where I often don't even bother asking anymore and just handover my CSR Visa card. Within the US, I don't have too much of a problem with Amex acceptance.
#96
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K, UA Gold, Marriott LTT, Avis President's Club
Posts: 1,539
I was at a restaurant in Budapest once and we went to pay with a Visa. The waiter said "we only accept American Express or cash". Besides that one experience, I normally don't even bother with AMEX outside the US.
#97
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: LAX
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, AA EXP, Hilton Diamond, Wyndham Diamond, DL PM, Marriott Platinum, IHG Platinum
Posts: 1,305
can hardly imagine this is a fantastic. you pay $1k in fees for those two cards, just to get the 5x return on airline tickets? you maybe travel a lot but AMEX certainly can't survive just with travellers like you.
I do travel quite a bit, but after points/miles redemption, chase/citi airline credits, the amount left to be charge by AMEX just too far from $10k to make the annual fees worthy.
I do travel quite a bit, but after points/miles redemption, chase/citi airline credits, the amount left to be charge by AMEX just too far from $10k to make the annual fees worthy.
#98
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 207
It really only makes sense if the fact that you take Amex causes people to spend more at your restaurant, or causes them to spend money there at all, that they would not otherwise have spent on a Visa or Mastercard. If the vast majority of those folks would have come in and spent the same amount on a Visa or Mastercard, then taking Amex could actually be costing you money. Amex could be playing on a common fallacy and they really need to go a lot farther to prove that taking Amex causes people to spend more if they want to make that claim.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correl...mply_causation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correl...mply_causation
Because AMEX is run on pure greed: Charge vendors more than the competition to accept AMEX cards, charge higher AFs than the competition, give "benefits " that only can be used with one provider (e.g. airline credit, private transport credit), only give high points when shopping at the AMEX "company store", etc.
Last edited by gsxsilver; Apr 16, 2017 at 3:10 pm
#99
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: Delta, IHG
Posts: 69
CSR is simply more flexible for me, both in acceptance and benefit usage. Combine that with a lower annual fee, and how it amplifies the point value of other Chase cards that earn UR points, it really just pays for me to stay in the Chase family.
#100
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AMS (SEA, JNB)
Programs: Mucci Reperateur des Coeurs Brises
Posts: 4,107
Where are you going that doesn't take Amex? Even international. 10 days in Japan and I had to use Chase cars one time at the Shanghai airport. Everywhere that took cards in Japan took AMEx.
And locally I can't remember the last time. Even hole in the wall eateries have Square or similar. All Amex.
And locally I can't remember the last time. Even hole in the wall eateries have Square or similar. All Amex.
I personally think the lower rate of acceptance is a big reason many 'millennials' may not want to get an AMEX card. They want a card that works, not a card that might be refused. They want to be able to have their interesting experiences abroad easily paid for and avoid hassle at the cashier, not the ability to flash a bit of tacky plastic/metal. Speaking for myself, I got rid of my Platinum due to acceptance problems outside the USA. I recently told KLM of my opinion that they need to ditch AMEX in favour of VISA or MasterCard.
And Shanghai is not in Japan.
#101
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat
Posts: 756
Outside the USA, many retailers do not accept AMEX as it is simply too expensive to process. I just spent two months in the Caribbean and after being refused so often, I just put my AMEX card away. In countries like the Netherlands where credit card use is increasing, acceptance of AMEX on the other hand still remains quite low. I once asked a retailer "Do you take AMEX" and she responded with one word "Never".
I personally think the lower rate of acceptance is a big reason many 'millennials' may not want to get an AMEX card. They want a card that works, not a card that might be refused. They want to be able to have their interesting experiences abroad easily paid for and avoid hassle at the cashier, not the ability to flash a bit of tacky plastic/metal. Speaking for myself, I got rid of my Platinum due to acceptance problems outside the USA. I recently told KLM of my opinion that they need to ditch AMEX in favour of VISA or MasterCard.
And Shanghai is not in Japan.
I personally think the lower rate of acceptance is a big reason many 'millennials' may not want to get an AMEX card. They want a card that works, not a card that might be refused. They want to be able to have their interesting experiences abroad easily paid for and avoid hassle at the cashier, not the ability to flash a bit of tacky plastic/metal. Speaking for myself, I got rid of my Platinum due to acceptance problems outside the USA. I recently told KLM of my opinion that they need to ditch AMEX in favour of VISA or MasterCard.
And Shanghai is not in Japan.
CSR is definitely what I would use internationally. In the states, I would always use what gets me the most benefit for a particular purchase.
#102
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Acceptance is one aspect of it. But here in the states, pretty much everyone takes Amex except some small businesses and family-run restaurants. When shopping online, everyone seems to take amex as well.
CSR is definitely what I would use internationally. In the states, I would always use what gets me the most benefit for a particular purchase.
CSR is definitely what I would use internationally. In the states, I would always use what gets me the most benefit for a particular purchase.
(Conversely, Comic-Con registration didn't accept Discover this year, but did accept AmEx. That seems kinda weird for such a high-profile event.)
#103
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 277
The folks at Amex clearly think that the reason people are going for the CSR is the benefits (travel credit, Priority Pass, etc) and not the points for spend. I think they are misguided. I hold the CSR for the bonus points. The benefits are only there to offset the annual fee; I'd get the CSR even if it had no annual fee and no travel credit and no Priority Pass. But here's what I don't get: even if we do assume that people are getting the CSR for the benefits, why does Amex give us benefits that are annoying, difficult, or impossible to use? The new Uber credit, broken up into $15 increments that must be used or lost each month, is a good example of this.
Amex, meanwhile, is still trying to enable interest income off of their Platinum cardmembers (by enrolling people in their Pay over Time feature), and really has nowhere else to send them to capture more banking services value. So the only way for them to compete at all is to offer benefits which are worth more to consumers than they cost Amex to provide. Thus the focus on hotel statuses and Delta lounge access (presumably negotiated in bulk), on Uber credits (certainly bought at a discount, and for less than face value), and airline incidental fee credits (which not everybody will fully use). Offering 3x points on everything would mean they lose money on every swipe with no way to make it back! (That's also obviously why Amex has maximum rebates on their premium cards like BCP. Chase does the same with the Freedom, because they don't expect to make enough money off that target market to allow unlimited bonuses.)
Personally, I suspect I'll be holding on to my CSR and Platinum for similar lengths of time -- until my current travel patterns shift enough they're not not worth it. I've got work sending me on trips about every quarter and have to travel (sometimes overseas) whenever I want to see family, so I easily spend enough on travel and dining to make the CSR annual fee worth it. But Delta SkyClub access and Gold hotel status (which I could never make on my own, but which I travel enough to really appreciate) are worth much more than the cost of a Platinum's un-rebatable annual fee (especially since I have a decent investment account at Schwab -- and while I've got it I might as well put flights on it). If Amex cut those less-quantifiable travel benefits in exchange for higher spend earnings rates I'd probably dump it, unless they were losing so much money on the card it was more valuable to me than the CSR.
#104
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP; UA 1K; and a bunch of hotel statuses
Posts: 89
This is what I meant One * can * drive a car himself around the town, but given other factors, he might choose to call a taxi/Uber. I think the idea behind is quite similar. For me, it is more than 30min. Restaurants (and even hotels) for a 7d trip to London. Theatre tickets, and one-day trip to the Stonehenge...The concierge service has saved quite some time for me.
#105
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 674
I think the article is spot on. Amex comes off as pretentious. I wouldnt want to pull one out at a first date because it sends a message that I am trying to impress with cash, which is not cool. Sharing pictures of my last trip? That involves a lot more money, but doesn't come off as pretentious at all.
And it doesnt help that I have zero inventive to swipe the amex, ever.
Corporate, if youre reading this, I am a millennial, I have have a PRG for 3 years, and I think I am about to cancel.
And it doesnt help that I have zero inventive to swipe the amex, ever.
Corporate, if youre reading this, I am a millennial, I have have a PRG for 3 years, and I think I am about to cancel.