Virgin Atlantic COVID-19 Cancellations and related issues
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,198
Virgin Atlantic COVID-19 Cancellations and related issues
... just this. As of the time of writing VS have not announced the cancellation of any flights to the USA from UK. Not even the ones tomorrow (Tuesday 17 March) have been cancelled. They've stopped selling tickets on them but they've not cancelled them. Their refund policy is also out of date and currently only allows refunds for those affected by the Schengen travel ban. Is this just Virgin being slow or is there something more underhand at play here? When passengers are asking for refunds on Twitter for their flights (because of the UK to USA travel ban) Virgin are saying that they will change for free subject to any fare difference and pointing them towards a refund policy that makes no mention of the travel ban. Part of me thinks they're trying to get as many passengers as possible to change so that they then don't have to refund them and will announce cancellations at the eleventh hour.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 13,464
How about they are still operating their flights because there are still thousands of thousands of people who still need to get back home to the US and back home to Europe.
And let's give airlines a break. This is a very fast moving situation and it's hard to plan anything when Governments just impose things without any consultation or warning and then change their minds a couple of days later.
And let's give airlines a break. This is a very fast moving situation and it's hard to plan anything when Governments just impose things without any consultation or warning and then change their minds a couple of days later.
#3
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC Silver, VS Gold, Virgin Trains Traveller, Her Majesties Secret Service.
Posts: 407
How about they are still operating their flights because there are still thousands of thousands of people who still need to get back home to the US and back home to Europe.
And let's give airlines a break. This is a very fast moving situation and it's hard to plan anything when Governments just impose things without any consultation or warning and then change their minds a couple of days later.
And let's give airlines a break. This is a very fast moving situation and it's hard to plan anything when Governments just impose things without any consultation or warning and then change their minds a couple of days later.
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Most flights are packed with people trying to get home from holidays or business trips. With this much disruption, some airlines are sending special flights just to bring people home.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,198
How about they are still operating their flights because there are still thousands of thousands of people who still need to get back home to the US and back home to Europe.
And let's give airlines a break. This is a very fast moving situation and it's hard to plan anything when Governments just impose things without any consultation or warning and then change their minds a couple of days later.
And let's give airlines a break. This is a very fast moving situation and it's hard to plan anything when Governments just impose things without any consultation or warning and then change their minds a couple of days later.
#6
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 1
You probably couldn't have said it better but that's not the point.
Obviously, there will be passengers who will be allowed through immigration when they get to the US and will want the flight to go ahead.
AS a UK citizen, I will not be allowed in since Trump issued the updated travel advisory including UK and Ireland in the list of excluded nationals.
I'm booked onto a flight to MIA at 10:010 tomorrow (17th) which, being less than 24 hours away, is now open for check in.
I've tried checking in but get a message that says I will need to check in at the airport.
Since I live in Cheshire, this means that I will have to travel down tonight, pay for a hotel and take my luggage to the airport just to be told that I can't fly.
If I don't show, I will not be able to claim a refund.
If Virgin cancelled my ticket (not necessarily the flight), it would save me from the travel today and tomorrow, would allow me to cancel my 2 weeks accommodation and airport transfers with a glimmer of hope for getting some kind of refund.
I've spent 4 hours on the phone and tried SMS and twitter but all to no avail.
No doubt there are several hundred other people on tomorrow's flights in similar predicaments so I agree with the OP.
Something is not right here.
Virgin Atlantic should take clear action, their website should contain up to date information, that information should not be ambiguous ("we are currently evaluating what this means" is not very helpful). Other airlines are doing this in a much better way.
Obviously, there will be passengers who will be allowed through immigration when they get to the US and will want the flight to go ahead.
AS a UK citizen, I will not be allowed in since Trump issued the updated travel advisory including UK and Ireland in the list of excluded nationals.
I'm booked onto a flight to MIA at 10:010 tomorrow (17th) which, being less than 24 hours away, is now open for check in.
I've tried checking in but get a message that says I will need to check in at the airport.
Since I live in Cheshire, this means that I will have to travel down tonight, pay for a hotel and take my luggage to the airport just to be told that I can't fly.
If I don't show, I will not be able to claim a refund.
If Virgin cancelled my ticket (not necessarily the flight), it would save me from the travel today and tomorrow, would allow me to cancel my 2 weeks accommodation and airport transfers with a glimmer of hope for getting some kind of refund.
I've spent 4 hours on the phone and tried SMS and twitter but all to no avail.
No doubt there are several hundred other people on tomorrow's flights in similar predicaments so I agree with the OP.
Something is not right here.
Virgin Atlantic should take clear action, their website should contain up to date information, that information should not be ambiguous ("we are currently evaluating what this means" is not very helpful). Other airlines are doing this in a much better way.
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
I agree with that sentiment but US citizens returning to the USA from the UK cannot even fly into an airport like MCO - they've got to go through one of the 13 funnel airports. Taking MCO as an example; US citizens can't fly into that airport and neither can UK citizens. Who is left to travel on a flight like this that hasn't been cancelled? If BA can manage to cancel their flights for tomorrow and Wednesday then I don't see why it's so difficult for VS.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Barcelona, London, on a plane
Programs: BA Gold, TK E+, AA PP, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 11,335
And there are a handful of human beings trying to figure it all out, who are far too swamped with work and concerns over their jobs and the health of their own families to worry about criticisms on FT from people who are safe at home...
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,198
That doesn't have anything to do with the outbound does it? Are you seriously thinking Virgin are going to run an outbound from LGW/MAN to MCO that's empty and not cancelled? Maybe they are but it just seems like an odd strategy given that BA has cancelled their outbound flights.
#11
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
That doesn't have anything to do with the outbound does it? Are you seriously thinking Virgin are going to run an outbound from LGW/MAN to MCO that's empty and not cancelled? Maybe they are but it just seems like an odd strategy given that BA has cancelled their outbound flights.
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,198
That's amazing that they're doing that but I'm guessing as they were empty outbound they wouldn't have been flights you could actually buy or be booked onto (ie. cancelled). It's just seems like an odd way of dealing with it - surely you just cancel the flight, issue refunds and move on. I wonder if they've run out of money.
#13
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 439
Overnight Disney World has announced that it's closing all its hotels on Friday, contrary to what they had announced previously (parks closed but hotels open). So at the very least all the Virgin Holidays customers who are there need to be brought home, or VH will be responsible for finding alternative accommodations for all of them. And that's not counting all the ones who are staying in non-Disney hotels that will likely close soon or already have. Then add in the non-VH but just VS customers who need to be taken care of. Don't forget that under EU261 airlines have to pay for accommodations, food, and transportation if they cancel flights, even in a force majeure case such as this. At this point none of us know how long this is going to take so it may very well be more cost effective for VS to fly the outbounds empty and bring everyone home than to have to pay to extend all their passengers' stays for who knows how long.
#14
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: VS Au, Skywards Au, BA Exec Ag, HH Diamond, Taj Au
Posts: 1,389
That's amazing that they're doing that but I'm guessing as they were empty outbound they wouldn't have been flights you could actually buy or be booked onto (ie. cancelled). It's just seems like an odd way of dealing with it - surely you just cancel the flight, issue refunds and move on. I wonder if they've run out of money.
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
That's amazing that they're doing that but I'm guessing as they were empty outbound they wouldn't have been flights you could actually buy or be booked onto (ie. cancelled). It's just seems like an odd way of dealing with it - surely you just cancel the flight, issue refunds and move on. I wonder if they've run out of money.