Community
Wiki Posts
Search

invol downgrade -- ?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2012, 1:29 pm
  #16  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 294
too be honest, im not really bothered. But I still think its bad business.
I actually was #3 to board but was pulled aside. Again they did admit it was a mistake and their fault in Houston, but oh well.
I only wish If i was misconnecting on paid tickets that I could bump upgradees, but I know that doesnt happen (especially since it happens to me like once a month PEK-ORD-CLT due to late arrival and I end up flying home in Y as F is all upgrades...but im good with that).
remember key fact: we SOLD an upgrade and bumped you - so for $120 upgrade they threw me under the bus.
Its all about good will, and I think ...they failed here.
A sorry might have been good enough!
and for the record: I travel intl. in paid C class on UA and US (and in F with my award tickets) and domestic on Y with US as I like my upgrades.
end of the day, I still like US, just think 'operational reasons' is a cop-out
CLTF is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 1:43 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: United 1K; AA Platinum
Posts: 326
Originally Posted by CLTF
Dear Mr.CLTF

Thank you for contacting US Airways.

We apologize for the difficulties you encountered. The experience you
described is certainly not characteristic of the superior service we
strive to provide.

Unfortunately, we do not offer compensation for a Preferred
complimentary upgrade when the First class seat is made unavailable due
to operational needs at the airport.


While we do understand your frustration, we are unable to provide
compensation for the flight.

Thank you for writing and allowing us this opportunity to explain our
position. We value your business and active participation in the
Dividend Miles program and hope to continue to be your carrier of
choice.

Sincerely,

Ms. XXXX XXXXX
Preferred Dividend Miles Service Center
US Airways

-------------

pretty sad in my opinion to basically say - sorry we dont care, but keep giving us money!

odd.
"Operational need?" More like discretionary mistake! It's not a "need" when they could just have well have refunded the non-elite's money for selling them a product they didn't have available to him at the time he tried buying it.
blueheronNC is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 1:44 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PHL
Programs: AA Executive Platinum; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,663
Originally Posted by CLTF
...end of the day, I still like US, just think 'operational reasons' is a cop-out
If it happened to me, this would be the way I would feel as well. I love US but I know there are occasional hiccups along the way that I do not like.
apeortdz is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 2:40 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PHL
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, AA Gold, FB Gold, ITA Volare Executive
Posts: 3,294
Unhappy Makes me sad

Geez, I feel for the OP, who does have the right perspective on it all, at the end of the day ....

But, gosh, it's not like anyone really needs to understand US's position. It's very understandable, if you look at it in terms of their rules and micro profit structure (although, like others, one wonders exactly how this particular "over sale" came about). However, in US's inability to comprehend the deleterious effect of being seen as -- I'm looking for the contemporary euphemism for an inappropriate childhood phrase about the type of person who gives you something only to take it back -- well, that type of person (or company); and how much the customer would have preferred never to have been tendered at all the "gift," were he or she to be aware that it would not last long ... I don't know -- as a customer, makes me sad. Because the more of these things I read about, the less enjoyment I get from all of the good things that I do get from flying US regularly. As OP said above, just an apology, a "we screwed up, this shouldn't have happened" and a little bit of "make nice" would go a long way to diffusing the anxiety. Instead, it makes me one of those tiresome people who work hard to get on first, lest my arguing rights be diminished in the event of a foul-up by US.
Biggie Fries is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 3:35 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: YYZ/YHM/BUF
Programs: AA Plat, HH Gold, MR Plat
Posts: 4,212
I'm still confused as to how the Gate Agent was even able to sell the OP's seat as a GoFirst upgrade. The OP had already checked-in and was holding a boarding pass. The system wouldn't have that space showing available for sale, right? So the Gate Agent deliberately removed the OP's upgrade, reassigned him to a crappy coach seat, and used some BS "computer glitch" excuse.

Maybe the old man was an employee's friend or relative and they were trying to do him a favour. At any rate, this type of behaviour should not be tolerated. Sometimes airline employees have too much power to screw good customers.
FlyerAl is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 4:14 pm
  #21  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
I think the OP should escalate this. Whether the GA did it for a bonus payment or to help a friend or family member, it sounds like clear shenanigans to me. The GA should be disciplined even if the OP doesn't get compensation, which IMO should be given. This does not sound like an innocuous operational issue to me at all.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 5:45 pm
  #22  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by blueheronNC
"Operational need?" More like discretionary mistake! It's not a "need" when they could just have well have refunded the non-elite's money for selling them a product they didn't have available to him at the time he tried buying it.
Sorry, but US is a for-profit company. The notion that any business which expects to stay in business would refund a paid ticket to take care of a freebie is just not tenable.

Before folks on FT go running around accusing the GA of misconduct, how about the possibility that a misconnecting paid F pax was the cause?

Maybe the solution is not to UG anybody before the gate and then process UG's at T-15. That way, there are no downgrades and everybody's expectations are clear.
Often1 is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 6:20 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: DCA
Programs: AA PPro, Mariott Ambassador, B6 Mosaic, SBUX Gold, Best Buy Elite
Posts: 1,838
Originally Posted by SS255
This is where having a published "downgrade kit" would really go a long way in making downgraded customers feel whole again. Sure, it was a free upgrade, so the OP is not technically entitled to any compensation, but the tenets of good customer service state that when you give an elite a free upgrade, and then take it away, you leave that customer in a worse of state than if you had never given them the free upgrade to begin with. It's just not a very good way to run a business.

Is US doing anything wrong by not giving downgraded customers compensation? Not really. But they're certainly not doing anything right.
This is exactly the issue with downgrading customers. Typically they are left with a worse seat then they might have had before their upgrade. While I understand the need to downgrade people on occasions, leaving them in seats worse then they originally booked should justify some sort of compensation.
ellinj is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 6:21 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: IAD
Programs: DL-Silver; BA-Bronze
Posts: 1,162
Originally Posted by Often1
Sorry, but US is a for-profit company. The notion that any business which expects to stay in business would refund a paid ticket to take care of a freebie is just not tenable.
In this case it doesn't appear to be a refund for a paid ticket but rather for a $120 paid upgrade that was improperly offered.

You call it a freebie but part of the benefits of OP's gold status is complementary upgrades. Presumably, he has given US enough of his money over the past year to earn his status and therefore earn the upgrade benefit over a paid upgrade at the gate.

Under your reasoning, why not just sell upgrades at the gate until T-15 and then offer elite upgrades for any seat left - ala United? AFAIK US doesn't do this (at least not deliberately).
bevoinva is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 6:55 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Programs: AA EXP Hilton Diamond
Posts: 543
Originally Posted by Often1
Sorry, but US is a for-profit company. The notion that any business which expects to stay in business would refund a paid ticket to take care of a freebie is just not tenable.

Before folks on FT go running around accusing the GA of misconduct, how about the possibility that a misconnecting paid F pax was the cause?

Maybe the solution is not to UG anybody before the gate and then process UG's at T-15. That way, there are no downgrades and everybody's expectations are clear.
I see you on a number of different board all of time reminding us that airlines are businesses, and that they don’t owe us anything.

Well in my experience, great businesses have great customer servive. I was in a local McDonald’s the other day and my great-niece spilled her small vanilla shake. Yes, I only paid for that one and I was not entitled to anything. However, a very nice young woman came from behind the counter and helped me clean-up my great-niece and then gave her a new shake. I was I entitled to this, no. Did I feel good and will I go back, yes.

How you treat people really matters. Just look at WN, they are no longer the low cost airline. But they still live in the glow of treating people well.
pbuntrock is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 7:46 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: FLL
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 79
Originally Posted by CLTF
Dear Mr.CLTF

Thank you for contacting US Airways.

We apologize for the difficulties you encountered. The experience you
described is certainly not characteristic of the superior service we
strive to provide.

Unfortunately, we do not offer compensation for a Preferred
complimentary upgrade when the First class seat is made unavailable due
to operational needs at the airport.

While we do understand your frustration, we are unable to provide
compensation for the flight.

Thank you for writing and allowing us this opportunity to explain our
position. We value your business and active participation in the
Dividend Miles program and hope to continue to be your carrier of
choice.

Sincerely,

Ms. XXXX XXXXX
Preferred Dividend Miles Service Center
US Airways

...
Dear USAir ... nice response, but this is terrible (in my opinion)

I'm a CP (for many years) and things seem to be getting worse ...

Last Sunday I had an upgrade confirmed well in advance - at the airport, 5 mins before boarding, they called my name and downgraded me to coach ... said it was for 'Goverment Reasons' and apologized ... as I walked by my seat, I saw an older gent in my old seat, with a USAF pin ... and then the next 3 rows of first, wondering if all those people were paid 1st or CPs (higher in the pecking order than me)

Please, nobody get my post twisted ... I like USAir, and 99% of the time sing the airlines praises, and I'm appreciative of upgrades ... but in the last 2 weeks, I've had 14 flights (3 coast-coast), and 6 of them have been ridiculous (from a customer service perspective, on board and in the airport) ... I hope that was just January, but I've never seen such shoddy operations and lack of customer respect since being a Div Member for the last 10 years - it really does have me wondering what's going on of recent ...
dfsb is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2012, 5:54 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by FlyerAl
Agent deliberately removed the OP's upgrade, reassigned him to a crap'py coach seat, and used some BS "computer glitch" excuse.

Maybe the old man was an employee's friend or relative and they were trying to do him a favour. At any rate, this type of behaviour should not be tolerated. Sometimes airline employees have too much power to screw good customers.
I sincerely doubt that the agent was playing favorites or fishing for an upgrade commission. My guess that it may have due to "government requisition of space". US Airways does not overbook F/C on purpose --- even if they did, they would take away the seat of someone who had checked. Other than an aircraft swap, the aforementioned reason is the only one I can figure. I will leave to the reader to figure out what "government requisition of space" means.
Dont call me Shirley is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.