Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Denver Gate Changes

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2006 | 5:30 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
Original Member
1M
40 Countries Visited
100 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,204
Denver Gate Changes

Concourse A gates gone in 9 to 12 months...

Denver International Airport Tuesday announced an agreement with United and Frontier airlines that will meet the carriers' capacity needs in the near term and allow both companies to increase choices for the flying public. Frontier and United, together with their express carriers, handle more than 77 percent of DIA's passengers.

http://flydenver.com/biz/news/prDetail.asp?pr_id=179
ncorman is offline  
Old May 23, 2006 | 5:48 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1P, HH DMD, SPG PLT, Hertz 5*
Posts: 640
Looks like good news for DEN pax like myself! More flights + no changing terminals for UA!
jcasner is offline  
Old May 23, 2006 | 6:55 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 25
That is great news! Now I can easily use the RCC when flying TED to LAS rather than use the club on Concourse B and then going back to Concourse A to get the TED flight,
boulderbob is offline  
Old May 23, 2006 | 7:38 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Out and about..
Posts: 1,102
Glad to hear it, Thanks!
jjgollum is offline  
Old May 23, 2006 | 8:32 pm
  #5  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TUS and any place close to a lav
Programs: UA 1.7MM
Posts: 5,424
RJ Facility

Does this mean DEN is going to get a remote RJ terminal similar to IAD's G Gates?

EEEEEWWWW.

Where will it be located? Will there be a shuttle? If so will the shuttle depart from B?
warreng24 is offline  
Old May 23, 2006 | 9:36 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1MM, Delta Plat
Posts: 11,224
Originally Posted by warreng24
Does this mean DEN is going to get a remote RJ terminal similar to IAD's G Gates?
They are going to add-on to Concourse B...no additional terminal. The airport was always designed to be able to add on to each concourse. Notice that there are gate numbers missing on the concourses; B doesn't have 1-14.

I'm interested in seeing these dual loading jetways. That would be a help for the overloaded gates.
redbeard911 is offline  
Old May 23, 2006 | 9:57 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, Hyatt Plat, SPG Plat
Posts: 332
Originally Posted by warreng24
Does this mean DEN is going to get a remote RJ terminal similar to IAD's G Gates?

Where will it be located? Will there be a shuttle? If so will the shuttle depart from B?
The original plan was for the new RJ facility to be in the same location as the current RJ gates. The construction was going to be phased so only half of the gates would be out of service at a time during construction. Not sure if that might change with the downsized project when it finally goes forward.

Love the Ted flights moving to B. That will be great!
AceAirspeed is offline  
Old May 24, 2006 | 6:37 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Everywhere but home far too often
Programs: Too many
Posts: 401
Originally Posted by boulderbob
That is great news! Now I can easily use the RCC when flying TED to LAS rather than use the club on Concourse B and then going back to Concourse A to get the TED flight,
I second that. ^ ^ This was one of the many reasons why I didn't renew my RCC membership. Now if they just improve the RCC (free internet!) I just might sign up again.

The A Concourse restaurants and bars stink also. There are far more choices on the B one. This is good news!
mogulskiir is offline  
Old May 24, 2006 | 8:36 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
Programs: UA 2P, PassPlus Flex, LAX Customer of the Year for 2006, UAL Shareholder
Posts: 328
I'm always struck by a contrast I have noticed while walking through Concourse A. It is dominated by local airlines such as Frontier, and Great Lakes Airlines (world class, not), and the exotic destinations they serve. Then it the middle of it all are the Lufthansa and British Airways jets at gates that hardly represent an international presence.

I always thought it was a terrific move on UA's part to hold on to the Concourse A gates restricting Frontier's operations. However, I can see the inconvenience to UA customers changing planes from TED to mainline (or mainline to TED). Please, don't turn my favorite gates (B30-32, B34-36) into TED gates.

Last edited by andersjt; May 24, 2006 at 8:37 am Reason: Get rid of an icon I didn't want in there
andersjt is offline  
Old May 24, 2006 | 9:29 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1P, Omni Gold, Hilton Gold, *Wood Gold
Posts: 1,208
I didn't see anything in the press reslease, but I wonder how they will deal with the Ted flights from Mexico? If I am not mistaken, all international arrivals for the entire airport currently go into A.
jneugeba is offline  
Old May 24, 2006 | 12:49 pm
  #11  
Original Poster
Original Member
1M
40 Countries Visited
100 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,204
Originally Posted by jneugeba
I didn't see anything in the press reslease, but I wonder how they will deal with the Ted flights from Mexico? If I am not mistaken, all international arrivals for the entire airport currently go into A.
Same way they currently do, they use one of the international gates and have people clear customs. The gates currently used by United are not capable of international arrivals, only about 8 gates on the north side of Concourse A have that set-up.
ncorman is offline  
Old May 29, 2006 | 11:49 pm
  #12  
Moderator: Hawaii-based airlines & Hawai'i forums
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ka ʻĀpala Nui, Nuioka
Programs: NEXUS/Global Entry, Delta, United, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott, and Hertz
Posts: 18,724
Nothing like a real world experience to help me understand why consolidating operations into the B Concourse is a good thing.

The other day, my mailine LAX-DEN flight was delayed, first waiting for a group of flight attendents who were late from their inbound flight and then sitting at the end of the taxiway waiting for our numbers (I think the pax. manifest count didn't match the manual count, among other things). We even took a 'victory lap' onto 25R to reposition us at the end of the queue. Anyhow, we got into DEN about 20 min late, which ate up most of my connection time for my TED flight to MDW. As we were on out taxi into the gate, the purser announced that they had called ahead and let operations know many of us had ultra-tight connections. The crew was even nice enough to hold the cabin up to let us (about six of us) dash of the plane first.

So, I race over to the train to Concourse A and hoof it to the gate (about 7 min) only to find that they have just closed the flight and are pulling the jetbridge. For some reason, not only did they not hold the flight, but Ted decided to leave a few minutes early (Rar!). Since it was the last flight out of the day, I ended up with an involuntary reroute onto Frontier.
FlyinHawaiian is online now  
Old May 30, 2006 | 2:32 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Programs: United/Star Alliance - 1K
Posts: 2,176
Maybe next time they can plan an airport that is near the city it is named for, and doesn't cost a fortune in time & cost to get to/from? What a fooking nightmare it was to get from/to the airport this weekend. PHX was a breeze, but having to pay $19 for a Super Shuttle and be outside by 3:45 a.m. for a 6:25 a.m. flight in MR mode (have BP, no checked luggage) sucked. And those tram chimes! They sound like the slot machines at LAS. OTOH, security between 5 & 7 a.m. was a breeze. ^
Javan69 is offline  
Old May 30, 2006 | 6:01 am
  #14  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SNA
Programs: UA1K
Posts: 4,055
i don't go through denver often enough, but it's nice to see they're merging TED into concourse B. less time to travel between gates.
haddon90 is offline  
Old May 30, 2006 | 9:27 am
  #15  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Programs: UA MM, AS Titanium, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 2,252
Originally Posted by Javan69
Maybe next time they can plan an airport that is near the city it is named for, and doesn't cost a fortune in time & cost to get to/from? What a fooking nightmare it was to get from/to the airport this weekend. PHX was a breeze, but having to pay $19 for a Super Shuttle and be outside by 3:45 a.m. for a 6:25 a.m. flight in MR mode (have BP, no checked luggage) sucked. And those tram chimes! They sound like the slot machines at LAS. OTOH, security between 5 & 7 a.m. was a breeze. ^
Why a 3:45 super shuttle? If you're downtown, a 4:45 will get you there by 5:25 at the latest, plenty of time for that non-existent security line.
thegingerman is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.