Why Was UA #895 (ORD-HKG) diverted to SFO Sunday, 12/18?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: HNL
Posts: 1,097
Why Was UA #895 (ORD-HKG) diverted to SFO Sunday, 12/18?
Anybody know the reason?
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 23,999
Originally Posted by Teeejay
Anybody know the reason?
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
ORD-HKG doesn't usually go anywhere near SFO. Refueling would be in ANC or even SEA or NRT, not SFO. Picking up additional passengers maybe? Seems odd...
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,631
If it is SFO, it is probably for a mechanical that is best served by their own 747 mechanics prior to going over the water. If it was fuel, SFO is way out of the way. Also, if a mechanical that may required the plane to possibly go out of service, better in SFO with UA than anywhere else if you want to get where you are going, eventually. Of course, with today's weather, eventually is the key
#5
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,003
The flight diverted to SFO when it was over northern canada. Should be arriving SFO about 17:30 local.
#6
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PHX
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 1,461
Take a peek at the flight plot on www.flightview.com ... I wouldn't want to be on that flight.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 23,999
Originally Posted by andrewp
Take a peek at the flight plot on www.flightview.com ... I wouldn't want to be on that flight.
#9
Join Date: Jun 2004
Programs: united airlines
Posts: 4,967
how many RDM and EQM
Well first, I earnestly hope that the diversion was not on account of any serious health or safety issues. Then I would wonder about the RDM and EQM implications - do you get the RDM and EQM according to where your flight was supposed to go or according to where in fact it went? That flight map shows a lot of additional miles covered.
#10
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SFO
Programs: Free Agent, Any Status is Accidental
Posts: 1,395
As of posting, UA 895 is it 3,100 feet and 200 knots...
Really curious now as to what happend/is happening.
Really curious now as to what happend/is happening.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: Nah.
Posts: 13,967
Originally Posted by itsme
Well first, I earnestly hope that the diversion was not on account of any serious health or safety issues. Then I would wonder about the RDM and EQM implications - do you get the RDM and EQM according to where your flight was supposed to go or according to where in fact it went? That flight map shows a lot of additional miles covered.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: Nah.
Posts: 13,967
Originally Posted by UAalltheway
As of posting, UA 895 is it 3,100 feet and 200 knots...
Really curious now as to what happend/is happening.
Really curious now as to what happend/is happening.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento
Programs: UA 2MM/GS; SPG Lifetime Plat; MHC Lifetime; Tar Heel forever; and I "Dig the Pig" at Piggly Wiggly
Posts: 12,152
Am on the phone with 1K International right now......"No, sir. That flight is on its way to Hong Kong. Our system does not show a diversion."
#14
Join Date: Jun 2004
Programs: united airlines
Posts: 4,967
no extra RDM or EQM?!
Originally Posted by qasr
You only ever get scheduled miles point to point. Diversions help nobody.
Suppose the passengers go on later from SFO to HKG on another plane with a different flight number, same no extra RDM and EQM for ORD-SFO-HKG than originally scheduled/routed ORD-HKG?
#15
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: lapsed UA 1K (now a lowly 2P), HGP Platinum
Posts: 9,607
So, what path did it take? Flight tracker won't show any info now that it's landed.