United flight makes emergency landing at Newark Airport after landing gear trouble
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC,ALB
Programs: United 1k
Posts: 322
United flight makes emergency landing at Newark Airport after landing gear trouble
NEWARK -- A United Airlines flight made an emergency landing at Newark Liberty International Airport this morning after its landing gear failed to deploy properly, according to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
United Airlines Flight 634 from Chicago with 53 people aboard landed safely after 9:30 a.m. at Newark, its intended destination, the Port Authority said....
.....
ABC news, however, showed a photograph of what appears to be the disabled plane parked on the runway, with its right wing touching the ground, surrounded by emergency vehicles.
from NJ.com . Sorry, but my BBG terminal doesn't give the full URL...
United Airlines Flight 634 from Chicago with 53 people aboard landed safely after 9:30 a.m. at Newark, its intended destination, the Port Authority said....
.....
ABC news, however, showed a photograph of what appears to be the disabled plane parked on the runway, with its right wing touching the ground, surrounded by emergency vehicles.
from NJ.com . Sorry, but my BBG terminal doesn't give the full URL...
#3
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: UA 1K, AC *S, Marriott Plat....
Posts: 127
Scary. Hope that nobody was injured. I wonder how much damage the plane suffered?
#5
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: Continental Onepass /Silver
Posts: 5
Thats amazing
Just curious if anyone knows, how did the airbus land with only one half of the rear gear extended.. Wouldn't the weight shift during landing and draw the plane to the side without the fully deployed gear... I'm shocked the side of the plane never touched the runway causing a huge stream of sparks or anything..
Planes are made soo amazingly that it's great pilots are able to land them safely.
Ironic this happened on the day Sully's flight television special is going to air on TLC ..
Planes are made soo amazingly that it's great pilots are able to land them safely.
Ironic this happened on the day Sully's flight television special is going to air on TLC ..
#6
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: USA
Programs: UA MP( 1k; 1MM); Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 263
glad to hear every one is okay ^(well, except the lanbding gear). Good things there weren't too many passengers on the plane. That probably helped with quick evacuation.
#7
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wherever
Programs: UA 1MM for a while now, AS for a minute, BAEC newly minted Gold
Posts: 1,172
Kinda high for the approach to Lambert Field...
Just curious if anyone knows, how did the airbus land with only one half of the rear gear extended.. Wouldn't the weight shift during landing and draw the plane to the side without the fully deployed gear... I'm shocked the side of the plane never touched the runway causing a huge stream of sparks or anything..
Planes are made soo amazingly that it's great pilots are able to land them safely.
Ironic this happened on the day Sully's flight television special is going to air on TLC ..
Planes are made soo amazingly that it's great pilots are able to land them safely.
Ironic this happened on the day Sully's flight television special is going to air on TLC ..
I looked out of the window after we touched down, still moving and didn't see sparks, but the plane veered off center and the right engine ate a bunch of turf and skewed the plane as we stopped.
http://aviation-safety.net/photos/di...0&vnr=2&kind=C
http://aviation-safety.net/photos/di...0&vnr=1&kind=C
http://www.ntsb.gov/recs/letters/1988/A88_26.pdf
A pilot told me the plane was sold to US Air, but appears to belong to Airbone under new tail number.
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Airbo...81fc35d8a5739a
Cheers,
-Cyborg
#8
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: Continental Onepass /Silver
Posts: 5
wings never touch?
Thanks cyborg.. Glad y ou were ok on your flight.. yeah i guess the engine takes the majority of the screeching down the runway after landing.. Still amazed that the wing never touches the runway..Aren't the engines made to break off during impacts like that?
#9
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,123
Looks like the pilots did a great job overall. It's why hopefully people choose to fly United, not the cheap fares but well trained professional pilots when things do happen to go wrong.
AD
Just curious if anyone knows, how did the airbus land with only one half of the rear gear extended.. Wouldn't the weight shift during landing and draw the plane to the side without the fully deployed gear... I'm shocked the side of the plane never touched the runway causing a huge stream of sparks or anything..
Planes are made soo amazingly that it's great pilots are able to land them safely.
Ironic this happened on the day Sully's flight television special is going to air on TLC ..
Planes are made soo amazingly that it's great pilots are able to land them safely.
Ironic this happened on the day Sully's flight television special is going to air on TLC ..
AD
Last edited by iluv2fly; Jan 10, 2010 at 4:14 pm Reason: merge
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington D.C./ Luebeck
Programs: DL Gold, UA 1P , Hyatt Diamond, SPG Platinum
Posts: 214
I dont think they will fly this plane anymore.
#11
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 4,449
Should they have used the slides?
It seems to me that unless there was a risk of fire, they could have evacuated via a portable staircase, just like the air berlin over-shoot:
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/trav...0104-lnny.html
Though I am no expert, I understand that people can be injured on those slides, breaking ankles, etc. Certainly, if there were elderly people on that flight, I could see how having them slide down those evacuation slides could seriously hurt them. Was this just a knee-jerk reaction to the landing, or do you think they really needed the slides to get out quickly? Any thoughts?
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/trav...0104-lnny.html
Though I am no expert, I understand that people can be injured on those slides, breaking ankles, etc. Certainly, if there were elderly people on that flight, I could see how having them slide down those evacuation slides could seriously hurt them. Was this just a knee-jerk reaction to the landing, or do you think they really needed the slides to get out quickly? Any thoughts?
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,604
No, they're not. They are designed to break away if they encounter extreme stress encounters, like during a seized engine that is blowing itself apart, something along those lines. Sliding down a runway wouldn't introduce those stresses.
Looks like the pilots did a great job overall. It's why hopefully people choose to fly United, not the cheap fares but well trained professional pilots when things do happen to go wrong.
AD
Looks like the pilots did a great job overall. It's why hopefully people choose to fly United, not the cheap fares but well trained professional pilots when things do happen to go wrong.
AD
#13
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wherever
Programs: UA 1MM for a while now, AS for a minute, BAEC newly minted Gold
Posts: 1,172
I called our TWA pilot Fabulous Phil Callahan!
WRT previous post: engine on our 1988 flight acted like a well designed skid (curved sufrace).
Cheers,
-Cyborg
Cheers,
-Cyborg
Last edited by iluv2fly; Jan 10, 2010 at 4:14 pm Reason: merge
#14
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: RIC
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 3,387
Really? I'm pretty sure the flying public assumes competent pilots are a given and purchase on the basis of price and convenience.
#15
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: IAD
Programs: UA Gold + 1MM; HHonors Gold; Marriott Plat
Posts: 747
Great job pilots! I hope they as much kudos as 'Scully' did for his Hudson landing. I am sure this was no easy task either. ^^