Community
Wiki Posts
Search

2 reservations same day/time, problem?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 4:56 am
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: sfo
Programs: United GS, Starwood Platinum
Posts: 611
2 reservations same day/time, problem?

i made a reservation months ago for me and mrs lehms, she is on the free part of my MP VISA free companion certificate, i am on the paid part.


we just found out she needs to go somewhere else at the same time,same day as we are scheduled to return back home

her MP # is now on 2 reservations at the same time


problem?

my thought is to check only me in on the reservation we share for the way home and not her on that record and check her in on the other ticket we just purchased but am worried this is a problem

or

should i check her in on both and board solo

thank you for the help
lehms is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 5:40 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Potomac MD
Programs: UA MP 1K
Posts: 7,182
I am not an expert on this but I wouldn't check her in for both flights. You should call UA on this.
euslaner is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 8:07 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southeast Michigan
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 392
DON'T CALL UA. They may completely foul you up by claiming that the ticket is now a one way and invalidate it. Do as your intuition says, check in only yourself for the one reservation, and check in MRS for the other.
Tom Beyersdorf is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 5:29 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 321
The system never seems to be aware of overlapping or simultaneous itineraries. So UA will only be aware of the situation, if you make them aware.
easykristine is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 6:03 pm
  #5  
ssh
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Programs: UA 1K (MM), MR Plat Prem, Hertz Pres
Posts: 1,164
So... I'm wondering what would happen if OP checked his wife in for both, wife flew the new flight, but he handed both BPs to the GA at boarding and she scanned without checking for second pax. Possible, I think...
ssh is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 6:20 pm
  #6  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MCI
Programs: UA Plat, Million Miler; Starbucks Reserve
Posts: 281
Originally Posted by ssh
So... I'm wondering what would happen if OP checked his wife in for both, wife flew the new flight, but he handed both BPs to the GA at boarding and she scanned without checking for second pax. Possible, I think...
That strikes me as dishonest, and also as unlikely to work.
PTSBrian is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 6:23 pm
  #7  
ssh
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Programs: UA 1K (MM), MR Plat Prem, Hertz Pres
Posts: 1,164
Originally Posted by PTSBrian
That strikes me as dishonest, and also as unlikely to work.
It would be 100% dishonest. However, my question wasn't the morality, but rather whether or not the UA systems (technology or human) would discover the issue. It should not be possible, but I could certainly see that it might work with the current systems that I've observed.
ssh is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 6:25 pm
  #8  
Moderator: United Airlines
2M
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 73,165
Originally Posted by ssh
So... I'm wondering what would happen if OP checked his wife in for both, wife flew the new flight, but he handed both BPs to the GA at boarding and she scanned without checking for second pax. Possible, I think...
passagner headcount would be off and create extra work for GA/FA
WineCountryUA is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.