Luggage monetization
#16
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
And if your weight is less than airline assumption for passengers, the OP will work for you to get a $ per lb refund. Or you pay extra if over.
With an airline weight is money.
Meet the man who wants to weigh every passenger before a flight
EASA review of standard passenger weights in 2022 shows no significant change
With an airline weight is money.
Meet the man who wants to weigh every passenger before a flight
EASA review of standard passenger weights in 2022 shows no significant change
Yes. I think everyone should get a quota of weight + luggage. If you are heavy you have to pack light or pay more.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jan 6, 2024 at 2:43 pm Reason: Let's stay away for politics / OMNI/PR in the UA forum
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,768
Either that, or next flight ask United for a prorated refund if you drink less water than they have catered per pax and let us know the results - could be a major new revenue stream for frequent flyers who prefer to be dehydrated in the air.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jan 6, 2024 at 2:43 pm Reason: Quote updated to reflect Moderator edit
#19
Join Date: Jul 2021
Programs: AP AS BA
Posts: 368
If you're travelling internationally, "Pack for a Purpose" https://www.packforapurpose.org/ will gladly accept your offer to take medical supplies to less developed countries.
#22
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
There are already fares that don't include bags if you don't want to pay for them,
Rather than complaining that United is "socialist" for giving elites, credit card holders, or premium cabin passengers some freebies in exchange for their loyalty or paying more money, perhaps there's a different airline you might prefer to fly that disaggregates fees for everything?
Rather than complaining that United is "socialist" for giving elites, credit card holders, or premium cabin passengers some freebies in exchange for their loyalty or paying more money, perhaps there's a different airline you might prefer to fly that disaggregates fees for everything?
My initial post was about reputable couriers that pay you to carry their baggage airport to airport. I know there were outfits like that pre-pandemic. I see only one post that has come close to offering something concrete.
Delta and Alaska do have their forms of luggage monetization with their compensation for failure to get a checked bag onto the carousel on a timely manner. - there are people who will check an empty cardboard box as a free bag on routes where the odds are high for a successful bags on time claim.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jan 6, 2024 at 2:47 pm Reason: Let's stay away for politics / OMNI/PR in the UA forum
#23
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,169
Whilst I have nothing to back it up with, my suspicion has always been that higher levels of frequent flyers likely carry (and in particular, check) less baggage that the average flyer. They also likely pay more per mile for their tickets (again, on average) than the average flyer - even if you were to group by cabin class. At least part of the reason the airlines offer these higher baggage limits to their freq flyers is because they know they won't use them most of the time (in probably thousands of flights as a 1K, I think I've checked 3 bags exactly once, and my average is probably around 0.03 checked bags per flight!)
The additional cost to United for offering a high-level frequently flyer "3 bags, 70lb each" over "1 bag, 50lb" is likely almost zero - because the percentage of such flyers that ever check more than 1 bag is going to be low.
Airlines are not a "cost plus" business. There is no direct relationship between what you pay and what it costs them to transport you, and if they were then you could expect to be weighted on boarding and have your bags charged on an actual weight basis (not "up to 50lb").
#24
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,300
I’m confused, I thought this is what you’re against - isn’t a bag being included a „quota“ up to whoch you may or may not use the full amount? How is this proposal of a weight + luggage different? Are you also suggesting you should get a refund in this system where you don‘t use your full weight + luggage quota?
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jan 6, 2024 at 2:49 pm Reason: Quote updated to reflect Moderator edit
#25
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,687
One could then buy a basic economy fare, use their MP status for boarding group (or chase card) and pay for a seat assignment. Still likely less than a fully bundled fare and it gets you to your desired combination.
#26
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,178
They still exist, but they don't get much business these days. The ones that do don't even make it worth your time any more - you get something like a 5-10% fare discount and that's about it. You also don't get to pick destination or schedule, so not useful if you actually want to go somewhere.
#27
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AVP & PEK
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM
Posts: 6,454
I like it! With 3 x 70 lbs luggage allowance, but only seldom traveling with any checked luggage at all, I can put on 210 lbs, and still be within the quota!
#28
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CO hublette
Programs: UA AU MM,HH Diamond,Hyatt Globalist , Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,285
This reminds me of another thread from long ago, selling headphones.
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/13808298-post1.html
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/13808298-post1.html
#30
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,300
https://www.united.com/en/us/fly/bag...ble-items.html