Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA MileagePlus: "We have no material changes planned for 2025 program year."

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UA MileagePlus: "We have no material changes planned for 2025 program year."

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2023, 3:00 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,888
On the earning's call yesterday UA executives reiterated no material changes to MP at this time. However, Kirby made a comment that there is "significant opportunity to do even more with it". "A lot more detail" to be revealed in the upcoming Investors' Day early next year.

Black clouds appearing on the horizon? Thoughts, anyone?
uanj is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2023, 5:19 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: IAH & CMH
Programs: UA GS, UA MM, Marriott Ambassador, Hilton Diamond, Uber Platinum :)
Posts: 773
Originally Posted by uanj
On the earning's call yesterday UA executives reiterated no material changes to MP at this time. However, Kirby made a comment that there is "significant opportunity to do even more with it". "A lot more detail" to be revealed in the upcoming Investors' Day early next year.

Black clouds appearing on the horizon? Thoughts, anyone?
‘material’ can mean many things… for example I wouldn’t consider the 1K requirement being bumped from $24K to $25K to be material… and I’m sure there’ll be some form of negative change(s).

The good news is after seeing the Delta pushback they’d be pretty dumb to make massive downgrades… but there will be some changes otherwise they’d have simply said no changes…
Dyce is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2023, 6:10 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: ORF, RIC
Programs: UA LT 1K, 3 MM; Marriott Titanium; IHG Platinum
Posts: 6,958
Originally Posted by uanj
"A lot more detail" to be revealed in the upcoming Investors' Day early next year.

Black clouds appearing on the horizon? Thoughts, anyone?
Any change to MP qualification thresholds has to be announced before Dec. 31, 2023. UA can devalue award miles anytime.

What black clouds? Glass is half full now after DL’s change of minds.
Kmxu is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2023, 6:24 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 184
Originally Posted by Dyce
‘material’ can mean many things… for example I wouldn’t consider the 1K requirement being bumped from $24K to $25K to be material… and I’m sure there’ll be some form of negative change(s).
They need to bump the qualification requirements up, it's ridiculous how hub to hub everyone is at least Gold. And they should eliminate priority boarding / checkins for silver.
vicontt is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2023, 6:38 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: AUS
Programs: BAEC Gold, AA PPro, Hyatt Globalist, Amex Plat
Posts: 7,043
Originally Posted by uanj
On the earning's call yesterday UA executives reiterated no material changes to MP at this time. However, Kirby made a comment that there is "significant opportunity to do even more with it". "A lot more detail" to be revealed in the upcoming Investors' Day early next year.

Black clouds appearing on the horizon? Thoughts, anyone?
LOL, there are always black clouds on the horizon with these programs going forward. There will literally never be "clear skies" again.

Regards
SPN Lifer, uanj, nwflyboy and 2 others like this.
scubadu is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2023, 7:03 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, AA, DL
Posts: 7,418
Originally Posted by vicontt
Let's put it this way - I have never heard of a big corporation which allows business-related spend to be done on personal cards. At most, some of them allow business trips expenses on personal cards.
Well, I guess it's time to split some hairs on business related spend. If you're responsible for procurement and buy things like office chairs or computers or whatever, yeah, a lot of places will have a business card for that. But not sure that's really different from someone responsible for buying an airline ticket to do their job - visit a client, worksite, etc. but in those instances they may, per cmopany policy, put the spend on a personal card and obtain reimbursement. Both are "business spend"
drewguy is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2023, 7:22 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SAN
Programs: UA 1MM/1K, HH Diamond
Posts: 6,832
Originally Posted by vicontt
They need to bump the qualification requirements up, it's ridiculous how hub to hub everyone is at least Gold. And they should eliminate priority boarding / checkins for silver.
Did you not just see what happened -- and is happening -- over at DL? How, praytell, is UA supposed to simultaneously increase qualification requirements and provide less service to the vast majority of elites, and then expect to make more money in the end?
SPN Lifer likes this.
as219 is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2023, 7:30 am
  #53  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM; UA 1K; AA 1MM
Posts: 4,518
Originally Posted by vicontt
They need to bump the qualification requirements up, it's ridiculous how hub to hub everyone is at least Gold.
I've seen a lot of references like this (in both the UA and DL forums) recently but I haven't seen an explanation of why people think it is ridiculous. Why does it matter if there are a lot of second-lowest tier elites on a hub to hub route?

Originally Posted by vicontt
And they should eliminate priority boarding / checkins for silver.
What benefits would even be left for Silver?
SPN Lifer, lsquare, leoo and 1 others like this.
ty97 is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2023, 7:47 am
  #54  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, AA, DL
Posts: 7,418
Originally Posted by ty97
I've seen a lot of references like this (in both the UA and DL forums) recently but I haven't seen an explanation of why people think it is ridiculous. Why does it matter if there are a lot of second-lowest tier elites on a hub to hub route?


What benefits would even be left for Silver?
Well, E+ at checkin and one free bag.

But, yeah, generally speaking a fair number of people feel that status should be accorded only to people who fly exactly as much as them or more, because the herd is too big.
jsloan, SPN Lifer, uanj and 3 others like this.
drewguy is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2023, 8:33 am
  #55  
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 184
Originally Posted by drewguy
But not sure that's really different from someone responsible for buying an airline ticket to do their job - visit a client, worksite, etc. but in those instances they may, per cmopany policy, put the spend on a personal card and obtain reimbursement. Both are "business spend"
Well, this something I explicitly called out in my message, didn't I?

Originally Posted by as219
Did you not just see what happened -- and is happening -- over at DL? How, praytell, is UA supposed to simultaneously increase qualification requirements and provide less service to the vast majority of elites, and then expect to make more money in the end?
I don't want to discuss Delta here, but they got it all wrong )

Originally Posted by ty97
I've seen a lot of references like this (in both the UA and DL forums) recently but I haven't seen an explanation of why people think it is ridiculous. Why does it matter if there are a lot of second-lowest tier elites on a hub to hub route?
Because majority of benefits are zero-sum game (notable exception being checked bags and to some extent e+ seating)
If 3/4th of the plane have priority check-in, no one has priority check-in. If the same amount of people have priority boarding, there is no priority boarding. I"d rather have lower status with the benefits I can use than the higher status which is nothing more but a badge.

Originally Posted by ty97
What benefits would even be left for Silver?
Free bag, E+ at checkin, CPU at the lowest priority if they happen to travel on the empty plane.

Originally Posted by drewguy
But, yeah, generally speaking a fair number of people feel that status should be accorded only to people who fly exactly as much as them or more, because the herd is too big.
Nah, that's not it - like I said, better have some benefits without a badge, than no benefits and a badge.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Oct 20, 2023 at 9:49 am Reason: Please use multi-quote
vicontt is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.