Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

United to order 50 Airbus A321XLR (for 2024) (TATL w/Polaris seats)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Dec 3, 2019, 5:26 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
United Airlines Sets a Course for the Future With Order of 50 Airbus A321XLR Aircraft
New aircraft will improve operational efficiency, elevate the inflight travel experience and reduce environmental impact
Airline expects to operate new aircraft on transatlantic routes out of its East Coast hubs in 2024
Photos(1)

CHICAGO, Dec. 3, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- United Airlines today announced an order to purchase 50 new Airbus A321XLR aircraft, enabling the carrier to begin replacing and retiring its existing fleet of Boeing 757-200 aircraft and further meet the airline's operational needs by pairing the optimal aircraft with select transatlantic routes. The state-of-the-art aircraft, which United expects to introduce into international service in 2024, will also allow United to explore serving additional destinations in Europe from its East Coast hubs in Newark/New York and Washington.



"The new Airbus A321XLR aircraft is an ideal one-for-one replacement for the older, less-efficient aircraft currently operating between some of the most vital cities in our intercontinental network," said Andrew Nocella, United's executive vice president and chief commercial officer. "In addition to strengthening our ability to fly more efficiently, the A321XLR's range capabilities open potential new destinations to further develop our route network and provide customers with more options to travel the globe."

The next-generation A321XLR offers customers an elevated inflight experience and features modern amenities including LED lighting, larger overhead bin space and Wi-Fi connectivity. Additionally, the new aircraft lowers overall fuel burn per seat by about 30% when compared to previous generation aircraft, enabling United to further minimize its environmental impact as the carrier moves towards its ambitious goal of reducing its carbon footprint by 50% relative to 2005 levels by 2050.

United plans to begin taking delivery of the Airbus A321XLR in 2024. Additionally, the airline will defer the delivery of its order of Airbus A350s until 2027 to better align with the carrier's operational needs.



Print Wikipost

United to order 50 Airbus A321XLR (for 2024) (TATL w/Polaris seats)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 9:54 am
  #136  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 25,471
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
I think they will go with a new seat design - I imagine if they could simply port over the 767 version of Polaris in a space-efficient way to the 757, not only would it have been announced, but it arguably might have made sense to retrofit the fleet (given the announcement for Polaris was over 3 years ago...at this point, not so much). I would think that the seat choice for the MAX 10 is already made (since UA is supposed to start getting these birds), but perhaps they wait on the XLR - a lot can change in 3-5 years.
You may be right, but UA management has been trying to retire those 757s for years. I doubt there was a ton of interest in retrofitting them.

Based on a quick Google search, the 767 has a cabin width of 15'6", and the 737/757 11'7". While other considerations might make it impractical, width isn't one of them: 2 rows and one aisle is less than 2/3 the width of three rows and two aisles, but the 737/757 is more than 2/3 the width of the 767. (And, as pointed out, the A321 is wider still).
jsloan is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 10:21 am
  #137  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by jsloan
You may be right, but UA management has been trying to retire those 757s for years. I doubt there was a ton of interest in retrofitting them.
And this may be the reason why United ends up taking the MAX10 to replace. While the MAX10 is a vastly less capable plane, narrower (by 7" than the neo) and with a new telescoping landing great (something else to go wrong) it is basically just a stretched MAX9, so wing and engines are the same, resulting in less range than the MAX9, assuming Boeing can get it certified (test flights are starting in January 2020, promised delivery is late 2020) United will get these 3 years earlier than the a321xlr. It is also possible that the J seats are already ordered and so the die is cast with the MAX10.

This said, assuming that United could get airbus to come up with some earlier a321neo slots, having a common fleet (some ps type a321neo, and then similarly laid out a321xlr that can be used on longer and international routes) makes the most sense.

I think that United was really done a long term diservice by its hard headed focus on Boeing these last few years.

and p.s. I 110% agree we will see a direct aisle access style seat. United directly competes with AA and DL and will be competing on may routes overseas with OALs, most of which have (and probably even more by 2024) have direct aisle access. United made a serious error in putting last gen seats on the 787, repeating it with the MAX10 and a321lxr would really be a bad competitive move.
spin88 is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 10:32 am
  #138  
Flyertalk Evangelist, Moderator: United Airlines MileagePlus
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL DM, UA Nostalgist, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 16,045
Originally Posted by televisor
7 inches, and different curvature. That could vastly change the equation. Probably won't, since they'll want consistency. But it could.
Fine, 1.75 inches - I was talking per seat. It's a really small difference that is usually fudged with blank space, aisle space, or angling differences. It's not "we can commission a whole new seat design!".

Originally Posted by jsloan
Read the comments here about the "outdated" pmCO business class, and then imagine the uproar if they delivered a new long-haul plane with those seats.

I wonder if they can use a design similar to the columns on the 767 -- just, 1x1 instead of 1x1x1. There's enough overlap that I don't think there's going to be a ton of wasted space.
I fully expect them to do something novel here, I'm just disappointed at the prospect. Despite the bulk of outrage about the "serious error in putting last gen seats on the 787" etc. I find the Diamond seat just fine, and it's actually interesting to finally see a tide of backlash on FT about the Polaris seats being too cramped, too many walls, etc. I've certainly given up on sitting next to someone in the Polaris layout, which is a downside, although I am overall a big fan of the seat.

A 1x1 Polaris seat is definitely doable on the narrowbody, but it still wastes half a seat on each end of a paired column because of the staggered layout, as do most similar layouts. I doubt you could fit more than 14 Polaris seats in zone 1 of a 757 (the B6/EI pattern manages 16 with some all-aisle seats) and AA has only 10 in F. I'm sure it's not a universal opinion, but I would much rather not pay the extra 1/8 of a seat every time I fly just so I don't have to step over someone. I feel similarly as I did about VX F - the 55" pitch was nice but just not worth paying that much more for.

Z/P/PZ space is already hard to manage on the 16J 757s, so I can't exactly cheer a 14J 321 just because it is all-aisle.
jsloan likes this.
findark is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 10:39 am
  #139  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
500k
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, ALL Accor Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Marriott Bonvoy Gold, Avis PC, Hertz PC
Posts: 10,563
Originally Posted by findark
Z/P/PZ space is already hard to manage on the 16J 757s, so I can't exactly cheer a 14J 321 just because it is all-aisle.
I'm not too familiar with the A321 specs - is there similar / less space between the 1L and 2L doors? (or is there even a 2L on it?)
PsiFighter37 is online now  
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 10:42 am
  #140  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Silver. (Former UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat)
Posts: 9,422
Originally Posted by spin88
it is basically just a stretched MAX9, so wing and engines are the same, resulting in less range than the MAX9, assuming Boeing can get it certified (test flights are starting in January 2020
My understanding is that the MAX 10 neither needs nor has MCAS which should make certification easier.

Last edited by LarryJ; Dec 8, 2019 at 11:44 am
LarryJ is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 10:51 am
  #141  
Flyertalk Evangelist, Moderator: United Airlines MileagePlus
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL DM, UA Nostalgist, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 16,045
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
I'm not too familiar with the A321 specs - is there similar / less space between the 1L and 2L doors? (or is there even a 2L on it?)
I don't have specs to hand, but based on seatmaps it's broadly similar - I think the 321 might have a little bit more room. (Yes, the 321 has a door 2, which is regrettably just too close to the engine for anyone to use it for boarding, making the whole aircraft vastly inferior to the 757 for premium pax in my opinion )
findark is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 11:41 am
  #142  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AA EXP; UA 1MM & PP; Marriott AMB; Hyatt Globalist; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 61,804
Originally Posted by spin88
United directly competes with AA and DL
Originally Posted by findark
I fully expect them to do something novel here
None of the competition has a particularly appealing hard product, either. It's either the Diamond on AA and DL (752) or the Vantage on B6 and DL (767).

It will be interesting to see what UA does.
Kacee is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 5:26 pm
  #143  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,488
Originally Posted by findark
I don't have specs to hand, but based on seatmaps it's broadly similar - I think the 321 might have a little bit more room. (Yes, the 321 has a door 2, which is regrettably just too close to the engine for anyone to use it for boarding, making the whole aircraft vastly inferior to the 757 for premium pax in my opinion )
The 321XLR wont have a door 2.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 8:21 pm
  #144  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 39,957
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
737 MAX 10 will replace the 28J 757 fleet. The A321s will replace the 757 TATL fleet.
Actually, I was reading the a.net forums. They says it may to build new 737-MAX10-XLR aircraft. They can have more range, more capabilities, and more fuel-efficient, as well. It will increased the range. The range is 4,800nm.

Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
The 321XLR won’t have a door 2.
Right! Only 1 door in front of the aircraft, but 2 doors is deleted.
N830MH is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 9:52 pm
  #145  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by N830MH
Actually, I was reading the a.net forums. They says it may to build new 737-MAX10-XLR aircraft. They can have more range, more capabilities, and more fuel-efficient, as well. It will increased the range. The range is 4,800nm.
Zero chance boeing does a new engine and probably wing for a longer range max10. The 737 is an obsolete plane. It is jury rigged by Boeing as some users (swa, Ua, ryan air) want fleet commonality, and Boeing wants to minimize investment.

Boeing will either (1) try to milk the max, become a second tier supplier like its model mcD, (2) jump off a cliff with the 797, hope it works, or (3) invests $15+b in a new carbon fiber narrow body, sized for 160-170/210=220 seats.
spin88 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2019 | 12:33 pm
  #146  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA Silver, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 23,085
Originally Posted by entropy
That's what Airbus did with the A330neo, and its doing just fine. (and without the carbon). They could do it as the 783 like they originally intended, perhaps now a diet 787 would work better with their remaining budget. Or since they now have Embraer, using the E-jets thru the 130 seat market and creating a 797 as a slightly upscaled and upranged (from 738 to 73-11 stretched type)., they seem to do better with stretches.

I am also baffled as to why in the age of CAD that it costs so many billions for a relatively simple aircraft development. They were doing far more impressive work in the 50's and 60's with slide rules.
The A330 family is over 20% longer/wider (and holds almost 50% more pax) than the 757/767.

UA's use case (and I would imagine DL and AA would be in the same boat) is to find a 2-class, 180 pax airframe with ~5000nm range so that it can cover thin-ish TATL and SA (and Hawaii?) routes from their midwest and east coast hubs. A 767-200neo option could've easily met those requirement. The A321XLR also meets those requirements except for range. (oops, not sure why I kept thinking the max XLR range was 4000nm)

Maybe I'm also biased because I find single-aisle TATL flights in Y unbearable.

Last edited by pseudoswede; Dec 9, 2019 at 12:40 pm
pseudoswede is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2019 | 1:01 pm
  #147  
10 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Austin, TX - AUS
Programs: AA Platinum, Hilton, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott
Posts: 1,645
Originally Posted by findark
I honestly hope they stick with the B/E Diamond, as any kind of all aisle access design wastes a truly absurd amount of space in such a small J cabin. Doubt they will though.
UA could use Thompson Vantage Solo lie flat seat. It is optimized to allow all aisle access on a narrowbody.
cerealmarketer and oopl like this.
Austin787 is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2019 | 12:54 pm
  #148  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,846
Originally Posted by hirohito888
It would be interesting to see what seat UA picks for the 28J 737MAX10, and if that new seat will also be installed on the A321XLR.
Interesting to see, how that order will reflect on the TCON p.s. routes, and if a subfleet of those 50 frames might be configured to replace the high-J 757s.
cesco.g is offline  
Old Dec 26, 2019 | 9:18 pm
  #149  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,724
Some speculation that Boeing's response tot he 321XLR might be the 767-X, having new GE engines to make it competitive on range/efficiency.

Would be the quickest way to respond rather than a clean sheet design.

Hmm, haven't we been here before?

But Boeing may have no choice with the financial crunch from the grounding of the MAX.
wco81 is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2021 | 12:33 pm
  #150  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 46,752
Originally Posted by EWR764
MAX10 really isn’t a TATL solution... that’s going to be the 321XLR. My guess is we probably won’t see those airplanes for 2-3 years.
Did United actually order those? I haven't heard much about it for a long time.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Feb 1, 2021 at 1:05 pm Reason: moved to existing thread
bocastephen is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.