UA 179 (EWR-HKG) 19 Jan 2019 diverted YYR , passengers stuck on board for 13 hours
Jan 20, 2019, 7:26 pm
#61
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: ROC/NYC/MSP/LAX/HKG/SIN
Posts: 3,214
)
Jan 20, 2019, 7:29 pm
#62
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: YYZ/YUL
Programs: UA 1K, AC nadda, DL, WS-Nadda
Posts: 1,476
AC jazz has a couple of flights a day on the weekends to YYT then you would have to connect through YYZ, or YUL to get to back to EWR.
The Jazz flights are on DHC 8's so not a lot of seats available.
The Jazz flights are on DHC 8's so not a lot of seats available.
Jan 20, 2019, 7:32 pm
#63
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AVP & PEK
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM
Posts: 6,358
This might also be pretty horrible for the crew, I guess. Hadn't considered that before.
Jan 20, 2019, 7:43 pm
#64
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: KEWR
Programs: Marriott Platinum
Posts: 794
The crew will get paid the whole value of the pairing EWR/HKG/EWR.
Jan 20, 2019, 8:04 pm
#65
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PMD
Programs: UA*G, NW, AA-G. WR-P, HH-G, IHG-S, ALL. TT-GE.
Posts: 2,911
Except they are subject to be assigned to shorter pairings, starting with the least seniority, within a certain time period. But I think for this crew, they won't be legal to be assigned a short flight within that time period.
Jan 20, 2019, 8:12 pm
#66
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Flight aware is showing two separate UA 777 flights from YYR to EWR. It looks like one was a rescue flight (flown up from EWR and didn't spend much time there), with the original aircraft being shuttled beck to EWR. However, both YYR to EWR flights would have been in the air at the same time with the same flight number, so I suspect that this is wrong.
BTW, the discussion about rubber at low temps reminds my of the O ring failure due to cold weather causing the Challenger disaster, including the demo of dropping an O ring into a glass of ice water.
BTW, the discussion about rubber at low temps reminds my of the O ring failure due to cold weather causing the Challenger disaster, including the demo of dropping an O ring into a glass of ice water.
Jan 20, 2019, 8:27 pm
#67
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,512
Will Southwest have to serve meals to win Hawaii ETOPS approval?
Jan 20, 2019, 8:40 pm
#68
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
This event proves the vital importance of having that extra meal at hand since they were running out of food before Timmies arrived and I can assure you Timmie is not a meal (unless you consider donuts and bagels to be a meal?!)
-James
Jan 20, 2019, 9:30 pm
#69
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: YVR
Posts: 39
I sure hope United's delay in diverting much less going to a smaller airport/city instead of St. John hasn't/won't cause complications to the sick passenger. IIRC where was story/thread last year about United not diverting and the individual having medical complications as a result.
Jan 20, 2019, 10:02 pm
#70
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Programs: UA 1K, AA Lifetime Platinum, DL Platinum, Honors Diamond, Bonvoy Titanium, Hertz Platinum
Posts: 7,970
How much do you want to bet that this soon appears as a click-bait story on the FlyerTalk home page, with a headline that mentions United and the fact that passengers were stuck on the airplane, but with no mention that it was due to immigration/customs issues (much like this thread)?
Jan 20, 2019, 10:14 pm
#71
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta Metro
Programs: DL , AC, BA, Hhonors Diamond, IH Platinum, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 2,358
It's weird how people want to blame this on Canadian customs.
There would have been no need for Canadian customs if the plane was functioning properly. The primary reason for the long wait on the tarmac was the broken door. The customs issue was completely secondary to this. People don't schedule customs staffing based on the possibility of a diverted flight, nor are customs policies based on this potentiality.
This should have been a quick diversion to drop off a sick passenger, something that few passengers would have a problem with. It turned into a nightmare because of a malfunctioning plane.
There would have been no need for Canadian customs if the plane was functioning properly. The primary reason for the long wait on the tarmac was the broken door. The customs issue was completely secondary to this. People don't schedule customs staffing based on the possibility of a diverted flight, nor are customs policies based on this potentiality.
This should have been a quick diversion to drop off a sick passenger, something that few passengers would have a problem with. It turned into a nightmare because of a malfunctioning plane.
Jan 20, 2019, 11:13 pm
#73
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: PDX
Programs: AS DL
Posts: 9,038
I sure hope United's delay in diverting much less going to a smaller airport/city instead of St. John hasn't/won't cause complications to the sick passenger. IIRC where was story/thread last year about United not diverting and the individual having medical complications as a result.
If the person had seizures not long after take off why continue the flight, and be stuck 4 or more hours later. That aside. Since the plane turned around off the coast of Greenland why not St Johns rather than the goose. AC has Mtce there who might have been able to fix the door. There is lots of hotel space, and CBSA is staffed , even on a weekend.
Jan 20, 2019, 11:40 pm
#74
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,467
When the plane turned around, it was closer and north of YYR than YYT. YYR has a nearby hospital according to Google and I don't think the crew takes into consideration what specialists are available. So YYR seemed smarter because they weren't anticipating a problem with the door.
While it's easy to monday morning quarterback from the comfort of the living room sofa, it does seem this might have been handled a bit smarter.