No more "through checking" / interlining of bags when connecting from BE
#46
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,676
Actually, there are multiple reports of agents refusing to interline from a BE ticket to another ticket.
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,925
I have no direct experience, and will unlikely ever book domestic BE as a stand-alone, and definitely never would if I had an international connection to connect to, but Id assume the restriction is still there, unless the OP wants to test the case. IME, for me, the risk is too great.
After the week UA is having, bags aside, Id be doubly hesitant to do this - even here in SFO weve had lots of knockon effects of the issues via crew availability, so, for example, the SFO-BNA flight I was booked on last night (and I canceled earlier for reasons a couple of days ago) was canceled (in fact, both of yesterdays flights on this route were canceled due to crew), despite there being no WX issues here or in BNA. Even on a non-BE, separate ticket that could be an issue, but Id also suspect being BE puts one farther down the totem pole for rebooking priority - would definitely be a shame to miss a connecting international flight due to de-priority of being on BE and having to be rebooked on a later flight vs. earlier. Obviously, YMMV.
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,403
when the ticket came WITH a bag allowance? Like in the OPs case? Yes, if BE w/o bag allowance then clearly that's a problem. If you buy a bag w/ BE or have another way of getting a free bag ... there shouldn't be any technical reason for UA to be able to check the bag through to LX
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,676
when the ticket came WITH a bag allowance? Like in the OPs case? Yes, if BE w/o bag allowance then clearly that's a problem. If you buy a bag w/ BE or have another way of getting a free bag ... there shouldn't be any technical reason for UA to be able to check the bag through to LX
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,925
when the ticket came WITH a bag allowance? Like in the OPs case? Yes, if BE w/o bag allowance then clearly that's a problem. If you buy a bag w/ BE or have another way of getting a free bag ... there shouldn't be any technical reason for UA to be able to check the bag through to LX
in the OPs situation, others have reported being told by agents that they wont do it (as a policy) on a domestic BE ticket to an international itinerary. UA likely has a policy against it because they dont want people to do what the OP is doing, and so that is their way of discouraging it. They want you instead to buy the [presumably more expensive, as in OPs case] O-D itinerary.
As a matter of practice, UA also has a policy of not checking bags through to non-*A partners on separate tickets. Again, assuming the other carrier has an interline agreement with UA, which is probable in many of the cases when they will now deny doing it, it can be done, they have just decided they wont do it.
#51
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 1,673
I had UA agents attempt to not interline on a non-BE ticket. They just don't like doing that. The "rule" they quote is most likely their own invention.
Consider, that if you paid for a checked bag on a BE fare or have a free bag on a BE fare due to status, there really isn't anything different about it than any other economy fare.
Just the usual UA BS (but, admittedly, lately a number of airlines try to do that, and in doing so reduce the value of "alliance")
Consider, that if you paid for a checked bag on a BE fare or have a free bag on a BE fare due to status, there really isn't anything different about it than any other economy fare.
Just the usual UA BS (but, admittedly, lately a number of airlines try to do that, and in doing so reduce the value of "alliance")
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,925
I had UA agents attempt to not interline on a non-BE ticket. They just don't like doing that. The "rule" they quote is most likely their own invention.
Consider, that if you paid for a checked bag on a BE fare or have a free bag on a BE fare due to status, there really isn't anything different about it than any other economy fare.
Just the usual UA BS (but, admittedly, lately a number of airlines try to do that, and in doing so reduce the value of "alliance")
Consider, that if you paid for a checked bag on a BE fare or have a free bag on a BE fare due to status, there really isn't anything different about it than any other economy fare.
Just the usual UA BS (but, admittedly, lately a number of airlines try to do that, and in doing so reduce the value of "alliance")
yes, it is by policy, not by it cant be done (unless the other carrier is not an interline partner). The point of the policy is to discourage people from behavior like buying separate tickets to avoid the fares they are charging O-D. They interline to non-alliance partners on a single ticket, and generally,
will interline on separate tickets within the alliance (though I dont deny there are likely instances where agents dont want to make the effort, and potentially others where the agents may actually be ok doing it but dont know how/were never trained).
#53
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IND
Posts: 301
I have no direct experience, and will unlikely ever book domestic BE as a stand-alone, and definitely never would if I had an international connection to connect to, but Id assume the restriction is still there, unless the OP wants to test the case. IME, for me, the risk is too great.
After the week UA is having, bags aside, Id be doubly hesitant to do this - even here in SFO weve had lots of knockon effects of the issues via crew availability, so, for example, the SFO-BNA flight I was booked on last night (and I canceled earlier for reasons a couple of days ago) was canceled (in fact, both of yesterdays flights on this route were canceled due to crew), despite there being no WX issues here or in BNA. Even on a non-BE, separate ticket that could be an issue, but Id also suspect being BE puts one farther down the totem pole for rebooking priority - would definitely be a shame to miss a connecting international flight due to de-priority of being on BE and having to be rebooked on a later flight vs. earlier. Obviously, YMMV.
After the week UA is having, bags aside, Id be doubly hesitant to do this - even here in SFO weve had lots of knockon effects of the issues via crew availability, so, for example, the SFO-BNA flight I was booked on last night (and I canceled earlier for reasons a couple of days ago) was canceled (in fact, both of yesterdays flights on this route were canceled due to crew), despite there being no WX issues here or in BNA. Even on a non-BE, separate ticket that could be an issue, but Id also suspect being BE puts one farther down the totem pole for rebooking priority - would definitely be a shame to miss a connecting international flight due to de-priority of being on BE and having to be rebooked on a later flight vs. earlier. Obviously, YMMV.
I normally wouldn't buy a separate ticket for a same day connection, but for ORD, in the worst case, I can just drive there in 3 hours.
#54
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IND
Posts: 301
Edit to add, I have no status with UA, just the Explorer credit card.
Last edited by IndyHoosier; Aug 12, 2023 at 2:39 pm