Better ua business lax-txl: stop ewr or lhr?
#61
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Yes, you are right, the LAX-LHR flight arrives around 12 noon - doing this later this month and if the Arrivals lounge does not let me in (but it often does if I ask nicely) then I go next door to the Priority Pass lounge (as I have a membership through AMEX Platinum) to have the shower.
I keep forgetting I am *G so have access to all the *A lounges at LHR. As the OP is going to TXL, the LH lounge is closest to the departure gate. If there is only access to UA then it is a nice walk across to the UA Club and back again, but note on the way back it is all walking as no moving walkway and you need to use the elevators to get back up to the departure gate - all doable but a bit confusing the first time. However, if too late for the Arrivals lounge and going onto TXL, then UA Club is a great option for the shower.
I keep forgetting I am *G so have access to all the *A lounges at LHR. As the OP is going to TXL, the LH lounge is closest to the departure gate. If there is only access to UA then it is a nice walk across to the UA Club and back again, but note on the way back it is all walking as no moving walkway and you need to use the elevators to get back up to the departure gate - all doable but a bit confusing the first time. However, if too late for the Arrivals lounge and going onto TXL, then UA Club is a great option for the shower.
Safe Travels,
James
#62
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 23
They do release award seats out of FRA, I booked as recently as summer '18. 2 weeks out is harder than 3-4 days out. Whether any particular day opens up obviously depends on revenue loads. Summer is actually easiest as there are more flights (2x to FRA and 1x to MUC) right when business travel is slowest.
#63
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: Chase, United
Posts: 403
They do release award seats out of FRA, I booked as recently as summer '18. 2 weeks out is harder than 3-4 days out. Whether any particular day opens up obviously depends on revenue loads. Summer is actually easiest as there are more flights (2x to FRA and 1x to MUC) right when business travel is slowest.
#64
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,394
There is no choice. If it's available, do it. Well unless you have a choice between munich, frankfurt, and zurich. In that case, definitely do not choose frankfurt. One, the munich and zurich flights leave way later so you'll actually be ready to fall asleep once you're done with dinner. Also, the transfer in MUC is about the best immigration transfer ever. It involves walking into the first class lounge on the non-schengen level of MUC, handing your passport to the immigration officer at the entrance to the lounge, enjoying the lounge, returning to the immigration counter to collect your stamped passport when it's time to leave for your connection, and walking downstairs into europe. I've always wanted to try LX F to compare but it's never been an option for me.
And yes, they will often release seats any day 14 to 1 day out. Don't bother until then and then check religiously.
And yes, they will often release seats any day 14 to 1 day out. Don't bother until then and then check religiously.
#65
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Programs: UA: 1K 1.5MM, DL: LTDM 3.5MM, JB: Mosaic4, LH: exSEN 1MM, Bonvoy LT Titanium Elite, Hertz PresC
Posts: 266
Wow. There is some good information here but much is terrible advice. About the only thing I agree with is to fly the long haul segment on either LH or LX and connect accordingly.
- EW in ‘J’ class is just fine. Plenty of legroom and a snack is really standard in Europe business
- But I wouldn’t fly through LHR (even though you will stay in one terminal) because it is a faff
- I would not take a train from FRA to Berlin. It is a long journey and, contrary to popular belief, German ICE trains can also run late or be cancelled. I’m not sure why there is any less chance of a misconnect with a train than a plane, but LH has flights to Berlin every hour. It’s a 45 minute flight. Also, there are no private personal booths on German trains.
- Whatever its shortcomings, TXL is a fantastic arrivals airport. I take the EWR-TXL flight about seven/eight times a year. Last week we arrived just after 0800, and I was out of the aircraft at 0810, at the taxi rank at 0817, and home at 0835. There advice that the Hauptbahnhof is closer to the centre is only relevant if OP is staying in Mitte or further east. To Ku’damm TXL will be as convenient.
- EW in ‘J’ class is just fine. Plenty of legroom and a snack is really standard in Europe business
- But I wouldn’t fly through LHR (even though you will stay in one terminal) because it is a faff
- I would not take a train from FRA to Berlin. It is a long journey and, contrary to popular belief, German ICE trains can also run late or be cancelled. I’m not sure why there is any less chance of a misconnect with a train than a plane, but LH has flights to Berlin every hour. It’s a 45 minute flight. Also, there are no private personal booths on German trains.
- Whatever its shortcomings, TXL is a fantastic arrivals airport. I take the EWR-TXL flight about seven/eight times a year. Last week we arrived just after 0800, and I was out of the aircraft at 0810, at the taxi rank at 0817, and home at 0835. There advice that the Hauptbahnhof is closer to the centre is only relevant if OP is staying in Mitte or further east. To Ku’damm TXL will be as convenient.
My choice in order would be LAX-FRA connecting onto LH FRA-TXL or if you want to stay on UA, LAX-EWR-TXL. Immigration in TXL is a non event if you get out of the plane first and once you land you are there. LHR-TXL only has a few flights/day so if you arrive late into LHR you might end up waiting for quite a long time for your next connection (same issue if flying via ZRH). FRA on the other hand has hourly flights to TXL. I prefer connecting stateside over a European connection whenever possible so that I can avoid misconnects.
#66
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,394
This makes no sense to me. Isn't the likelihood of misconnects even greater stateside? If the LAX-EWR flight is late and you miss the only EWR-TXL flight then you have to wait 24 hours or have to take two more planes to get to TXL. How is that better than having to wait a few hours but still get out same day in LHR, ZRH, FRA, MUC?
#67
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
As a native Berliner now living in Florida who is taking trips to Berlin about 6 times/year, I want to agree 100% with these statements.
My choice in order would be LAX-FRA connecting onto LH FRA-TXL or if you want to stay on UA, LAX-EWR-TXL. Immigration in TXL is a non event if you get out of the plane first and once you land you are there. LHR-TXL only has a few flights/day so if you arrive late into LHR you might end up waiting for quite a long time for your next connection (same issue if flying via ZRH). FRA on the other hand has hourly flights to TXL. I prefer connecting stateside over a European connection whenever possible so that I can avoid misconnects.
My choice in order would be LAX-FRA connecting onto LH FRA-TXL or if you want to stay on UA, LAX-EWR-TXL. Immigration in TXL is a non event if you get out of the plane first and once you land you are there. LHR-TXL only has a few flights/day so if you arrive late into LHR you might end up waiting for quite a long time for your next connection (same issue if flying via ZRH). FRA on the other hand has hourly flights to TXL. I prefer connecting stateside over a European connection whenever possible so that I can avoid misconnects.
#68
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,461
This makes no sense to me. Isn't the likelihood of misconnects even greater stateside? If the LAX-EWR flight is late and you miss the only EWR-TXL flight then you have to wait 24 hours or have to take two more planes to get to TXL. How is that better than having to wait a few hours but still get out same day in LHR, ZRH, FRA, MUC?
#69
Join Date: Nov 2012
Programs: BA Bronze, United 1K, HH Gold, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 3,477
Question: Do you also take a connection through FRA on the return to the US? How much time do you think is a long enough connection at FRA in that direction?
#70
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,461
I've done 60 minutes inbound from the US several times and it's always worked, though a couple of them were pretty stressful.
#71
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,419
There are quite a few around here who transit FRA more frequently than I, but on a single ticket, I'd rather not go under 90 minutes, and two hours would be preferred. I like the LH lounges so I'm fine erring on the side of a longer connection.
I've done 60 minutes inbound from the US several times and it's always worked, though a couple of them were pretty stressful.
I've done 60 minutes inbound from the US several times and it's always worked, though a couple of them were pretty stressful.
#72
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: Chase, United
Posts: 403
I agree except that I'd go with the 1h30 across the board -- I found inbound TATL is often late enough that 0h50 would not be enough at FRA. Granted, LH will put you on the next flight, so not too bad, to be sure.
#73
Join Date: Nov 2012
Programs: BA Bronze, United 1K, HH Gold, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 3,477
There are quite a few around here who transit FRA more frequently than I, but on a single ticket, I'd rather not go under 90 minutes, and two hours would be preferred. I like the LH lounges so I'm fine erring on the side of a longer connection.
I've done 60 minutes inbound from the US several times and it's always worked, though a couple of them were pretty stressful.
I've done 60 minutes inbound from the US several times and it's always worked, though a couple of them were pretty stressful.
#74
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Programs: UA: 1K 1.5MM, DL: LTDM 3.5MM, JB: Mosaic4, LH: exSEN 1MM, Bonvoy LT Titanium Elite, Hertz PresC
Posts: 266
This makes no sense to me. Isn't the likelihood of misconnects even greater stateside? If the LAX-EWR flight is late and you miss the only EWR-TXL flight then you have to wait 24 hours or have to take two more planes to get to TXL. How is that better than having to wait a few hours but still get out same day in LHR, ZRH, FRA, MUC?
#75
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: Marriott Platinum Elite, National Executive, United Gold
Posts: 1,181
I'm not sure this makes sense. Sure if you misconnect at EWR on the way to TXL, you can be rerouted via ZRH (late LX flight), LHR or FRA (if you're lucky since UA960 only departs 1 hour after UA962), but that adds an additional connection and opportunity to misconnect on the shorthaul to TXL.
Also, you'll end up in the same position as if you had taken a direct TATL flight from LAX... with the additional consequence of having to wake up early to catch the transcon to EWR. Missing the connection after the LAX TATL flight simply means waiting for the next shorthaul which I think is far easier to manage vs. the scenario above.
Also, you'll end up in the same position as if you had taken a direct TATL flight from LAX... with the additional consequence of having to wake up early to catch the transcon to EWR. Missing the connection after the LAX TATL flight simply means waiting for the next shorthaul which I think is far easier to manage vs. the scenario above.