777-300ER Reliability
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: UA 1K; *G, AA Plat
Posts: 1,700
777-300ER Reliability
How is the 777-300ER reliability for TPAC flights? Specifically SFO-TPE? I've seen slight delays (up to an hour) in the past two weeks, but the arrival has been within its scheduled time / within 15 minutes.
The reason I'm asking is I have two choices:
1. Buying SFO-NRT-HKG on UA.com which has a 3 hour layover in NRT.
2. Buying SFO - TPE on UA.com; then buying TPE-HKG; HKG-TPE on Evaair.com. There's a 2 hour layover at TPE.
I know baggage can be thru checked and I lose the ability for 'pushing IRROP' and am basically at the airline's mercy should SFO-TPE cancel or be delayed severely. Am I being too picky regarding a 4 hour flight in economy on Air Japan vs a 1.5 hour flight in economy on Eva Air? Option 2 is also cheaper.
EDIT: I am purchasing this on the Chase Reserve. Travel insurance should kick in if I need to stay the night in TPE and/or buy new tickets for TPE-HKG, right? So TPE should be ok?
The reason I'm asking is I have two choices:
1. Buying SFO-NRT-HKG on UA.com which has a 3 hour layover in NRT.
2. Buying SFO - TPE on UA.com; then buying TPE-HKG; HKG-TPE on Evaair.com. There's a 2 hour layover at TPE.
I know baggage can be thru checked and I lose the ability for 'pushing IRROP' and am basically at the airline's mercy should SFO-TPE cancel or be delayed severely. Am I being too picky regarding a 4 hour flight in economy on Air Japan vs a 1.5 hour flight in economy on Eva Air? Option 2 is also cheaper.
EDIT: I am purchasing this on the Chase Reserve. Travel insurance should kick in if I need to stay the night in TPE and/or buy new tickets for TPE-HKG, right? So TPE should be ok?
Last edited by laxmillenial; Nov 22, 2017 at 11:03 am
#2
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,461
Not in my opinion. I'd do the TPE transfer. (And I'd probably fly CX J on Avios, but that's a carry-on only itinerary.)
#3
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anywhere but home
Programs: UA 1K/MM, DL GM/MM, HH Dia, PC Plat, MR Gold, ALL Sil,
Posts: 4,552
Many times, longhaul delays at SFO aren't related to operation of aircraft, but getting aircraft moved, cleaned, and catered on time. Most of my int'l delays have been due to "late arrival" of aircraft, yet they arrived the night before and just weren't cleaned or catered on time and/or weren't brought to the gate from remote parking on time.
I've been burned a few times by having separate tickets, so now I'm more cautious and have longer layovers. Missing the first flight of a second ticket can be expensive.
I've been burned a few times by having separate tickets, so now I'm more cautious and have longer layovers. Missing the first flight of a second ticket can be expensive.
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Buying separate travel insurance may offer better benefits but read the fine print.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,337
I have done more than a dozen UA 77W flights this year and have not experienced any delays.
OP's question should not be focused on the reliability of 77W, but which transit point will minimize the risk of mis-connect to HK.
Why not just take SFO-HKG direct?
Both NRT and TPE transit are fairly straight forward.
OP's question should not be focused on the reliability of 77W, but which transit point will minimize the risk of mis-connect to HK.
Why not just take SFO-HKG direct?
Both NRT and TPE transit are fairly straight forward.
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: UA 1K; *G, AA Plat
Posts: 1,700
I have done more than a dozen UA 77W flights this year and have not experienced any delays.
OP's question should not be focused on the reliability of 77W, but which transit point will minimize the risk of mis-connect to HK.
Why not just take SFO-HKG direct?
Both NRT and TPE transit are fairly straight forward.
OP's question should not be focused on the reliability of 77W, but which transit point will minimize the risk of mis-connect to HK.
Why not just take SFO-HKG direct?
Both NRT and TPE transit are fairly straight forward.
There's no R space on SFO-HKG direct
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,413
You can see the same pattern on most of the SFO-SIN flights recently, and those are on the 789, not the 77W.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Floating around
Programs: UA 1K (1MM), DL Gold (1MM), Marriott LTT
Posts: 10,345
As for the reliability of the aircraft...the 777-300ER is *far and above* the utter disgrace the 787s were. That plane was grounded, cancelled, mechanical delays, you name it more than 80% of the time when it rolled out. Yes, 80% is subjective but based on my high use of the aircraft and/or of waiting for inbound connecting passengers at IAH to South America (they were flying the 787 from SFO to IAH which was often delayed 3+ hours due to mechanical issues).
-RM
-RM
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
It's pretty bad. Looking at longhaul (block > 8h) flights from June 1 (when longhaul 77W got going with some volume) through last Sunday, it's the worst active widebody in the fleet for A14. By A60, which I sometimes argue is more relevant for longhaul than A14, it's worse than the 772 and all 787s.
Code:
aircrafttype | a14 | a60 --------------+--------+-------- B744 | 63.7% | 88.0% B763 | 83.5% | 92.4% B764 | 84.2% | 92.9% B772 | 81.5% | 94.7% B77W | 76.8% | 93.8% B788 | 81.6% | 94.2% B789 | 79.7% | 94.4%
Last edited by mduell; Nov 23, 2017 at 1:39 am Reason: figured out how to upgrade back to a functional editor with [code] blocks
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA Plat 2MM. DL Plat, AS MVP
Posts: 12,752
How is the 777-300ER reliability for TPAC flights? Specifically SFO-TPE? I've seen slight delays (up to an hour) in the past two weeks, but the arrival has been within its scheduled time / within 15 minutes.
The reason I'm asking is I have two choices:
1. Buying SFO-NRT-HKG on UA.com which has a 3 hour layover in NRT.
2. Buying SFO - TPE on UA.com; then buying TPE-HKG; HKG-TPE on Evaair.com. There's a 2 hour layover at TPE.
I know baggage can be thru checked and I lose the ability for 'pushing IRROP' and am basically at the airline's mercy should SFO-TPE cancel or be delayed severely. Am I being too picky regarding a 4 hour flight in economy on Air Japan vs a 1.5 hour flight in economy on Eva Air? Option 2 is also cheaper.
EDIT: I am purchasing this on the Chase Reserve. Travel insurance should kick in if I need to stay the night in TPE and/or buy new tickets for TPE-HKG, right? So TPE should be ok?
The reason I'm asking is I have two choices:
1. Buying SFO-NRT-HKG on UA.com which has a 3 hour layover in NRT.
2. Buying SFO - TPE on UA.com; then buying TPE-HKG; HKG-TPE on Evaair.com. There's a 2 hour layover at TPE.
I know baggage can be thru checked and I lose the ability for 'pushing IRROP' and am basically at the airline's mercy should SFO-TPE cancel or be delayed severely. Am I being too picky regarding a 4 hour flight in economy on Air Japan vs a 1.5 hour flight in economy on Eva Air? Option 2 is also cheaper.
EDIT: I am purchasing this on the Chase Reserve. Travel insurance should kick in if I need to stay the night in TPE and/or buy new tickets for TPE-HKG, right? So TPE should be ok?
#11
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: UA 1K; *G, AA Plat
Posts: 1,700
#13
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,461