Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Outdated planes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 8:50 pm
  #91  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,324
Originally Posted by sbm12
You're not crazy.

Some love it. Some don't mind it. Some hate it.
As for the actual topic, I can definitely see how a pax could find the 67I outdated in the back. Yes, the bins are ancient. Yes, the PTVs are ancient. And yes, in a perfect world this cabin should have had a complete makeover during IPTE. With that said, given the short flight distances to Europe, and given the comfortable seat and 2-3-2 arrangement, I still am OK with flying these planes.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jul 19, 2015 at 9:43 pm Reason: Updated Quote to reflect Mod edit;Discuss the issues, not the posters
tuolumne is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 10:02 pm
  #92  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Suburban Philadelphia
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,393
Originally Posted by idayvuelta
To be clear, one may (as I did for many years) choose to fly United for its frequent flyer program, its routes or its prices. But in terms of in flight experience, I think United comes up short against a great many in coach and business (in which frankly I think you have include United Global First). Of what I've flown lately:

-Virgin America, Jet Blue, Delta (int'l domestic) I think are all better experiences by a measurable amount than United. American needs to finish its merger and still has some old old old J flying around, but I think will end in a better place.

-Lufthansa - old J is a joke but otherwise it's a quality airline. Y is a little tight.

-British Airways - Perhaps not what it used to be but much more professional flight attendants, much much better J catering and seats, better lounges, Y and Y+ a little better. Austrian and Swiss are miles better.

-Turkish has wonderful food and good seats plus a great lounge in Istanbul.

-Pretty much all of the major asian carriers. SQ, JAL, ANA, Garuda, Cathay. Even aspects of Air China compared favorably (though it uses the Continental seat). In some cases (SQ and jokes aside, Malaysia) the service is wildly better in Y, J and F. I will never forget being in Y on a lightly-booked flight on Malaysia and being addressed by my last name the entire flight by the flight attendant. EVA distributes pijamas and serves Krug in business.

-For what they purport to be, I also have had good experiences in Y on the LCCs (AirAsia, Tiger, Jetstar). Professional crews, reasonable fares, reasonable costs for add-ons like extra seating.

-The Mideast carriers are controversial but by all means do a better job in flight in all classes (on the ground/customer service is another story).

-South African Airways has a very reasonable J product with good wines and decent seats.
You lost me when you brought LH into the conversation. They have a few scattered premium products that are nice, but it's not consistently available (crap shoot based on aircraft/route). Their Y is garbage.
Cargojon is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 10:40 pm
  #93  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 723
Originally Posted by tyroner
Call me crazy but I really like the 757-200 when I fly to Dublin. It is cozy and the AVOD is good. The seats are fine and the bins are a decent size. In comparison to the 767 I occasionally get to LHR with looped video on a tiny screen and the overhead bins that are the stuff of stand up comedians, I say the 757-200 is perfectly adequate for TATL. Besides, it allows UA to offer more frequent service to DUB.

I remember a few years back, maybe 2011/2 I was flying DL to Dublin a lot and they had an ancient relic on the route. I think it was a 767 (please correct me if people remember). They bought it from some outfit in Florida perhaps and it was domestically configured and was missing mid cabin toilets. Again my memory isn't good, all I recall is that going back to the UA 757-200 was a dream in comparison.
I think you get a more personal service.
Owenc is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 7:41 am
  #94  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,169
Originally Posted by tuolumne
As for the actual topic, I can definitely see how a pax could find the 67I outdated in the back. Yes, the bins are ancient. Yes, the PTVs are ancient. And yes, in a perfect world this cabin should have had a complete makeover during IPTE. With that said, given the short flight distances to Europe, and given the comfortable seat and 2-3-2 arrangement, I still am OK with flying these planes.
Since I don't bring an obscene amount aboard as carry on, if I have to sit in back on a long-haul flight, the old 767 is my first choice. Every time.
halls120 is online now  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 3:23 pm
  #95  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: DFW
Posts: 537
Any reason 747s are not used very much anymore?

I've never even been on a 747. I think it would be cool to fly on one.
poisson is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 3:38 pm
  #96  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
500k
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, ALL Accor Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Marriott Bonvoy Gold, Avis PC, Hertz PC
Posts: 10,695
Originally Posted by poisson
Any reason 747s are not used very much anymore?

I've never even been on a 747. I think it would be cool to fly on one.
The 744 is an old plane, and the 748 has been ordered by very few airlines because of poor economics of flying the plane. If you fly UA, the only way you'll catch one a ride will be on a TPAC flight. I think once UA gets the 77W, they will retire the remaining 744s.
PsiFighter37 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 5:31 pm
  #97  
Moderator: United Airlines
2M
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 73,084
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
Originally Posted by poisson
Any reason 747s are not used very much anymore?

I've never even been on a 747. I think it would be cool to fly on one.
The 744 is an old plane, and the 748 has been ordered by very few airlines because of poor economics of flying the plane. If you fly UA, the only way you'll catch one a ride will be on a TPAC flight. ....
744s are still used by UA on both TPAC & TATL

SFO-FRA/LHR/NRT/HKG/PVG/ICN
ORD-FRA/NRT/PVG/PEK

NRT<>HNL was using 744 until a few months ago.

probably missed one ...
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 5:58 pm
  #98  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AA EXP; UA 1MM & PP; Marriott AMB; Hyatt Globalist; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 62,263
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
I think once UA gets the 77W, they will retire the remaining 744s.
The A350s are slated as 744 replacements. Although UA is scheduled to begin retiring 744s (slowly) next year. The 77Ws are replacements for 787s UA had previously ordered, with the orders converted to the 77W. They are not technically 744 replacements, though it may indirectly work out that way to a certain extent.

As WineCountryUA already pointed out, you could fly a UA 744 to Europe tomorrow (SFO-LHR and SFO-FRA).
Kacee is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 6:03 pm
  #99  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
500k
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, ALL Accor Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Marriott Bonvoy Gold, Avis PC, Hertz PC
Posts: 10,695
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
744s are still used by UA on both TPAC & TATL

SFO-FRA/LHR/NRT/HKG/PVG/ICN
ORD-FRA/NRT/PVG/PEK

NRT<>HNL was using 744 until a few months ago.

probably missed one ...
I've flown it PEK-SFO and NRT-HNL on UA. I missed the TATL ones because I'm based in NYC...don't get to enjoy them from this part of the country.
PsiFighter37 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 6:11 pm
  #100  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: DFW
Posts: 537
Those that have flown on a 747, are they more comfortable than the smaller 757 and 767?
poisson is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 6:25 pm
  #101  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
500k
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, ALL Accor Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Marriott Bonvoy Gold, Avis PC, Hertz PC
Posts: 10,695
Originally Posted by poisson
Those that have flown on a 747, are they more comfortable than the smaller 757 and 767?
I can't speak to Y - I've only flown J on it - but it's hard to beat the upper deck of a 744. I'd take that over any other J on United.

That said, I have heard those say that in Y, the 763s have the most comfortable seats in the back.
PsiFighter37 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 6:28 pm
  #102  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,169
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
I can't speak to Y - I've only flown J on it - but it's hard to beat the upper deck of a 744. I'd take that over any other J on United.

That said, I have heard those say that in Y, the 763s have the most comfortable seats in the back.
J on the upper deck of a 747 is the best business ride in the UA fleet, bar none. And Y on the 763s is the best Y in the fleet, seat comfort wise.
halls120 is online now  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 6:54 pm
  #103  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Springfield,MO,USA
Programs: UA 1K MM, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,637
747 UD is nice but I like the direct aisle access of the center seat(s) on either sUA or sCO 767
u600213 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 6:57 pm
  #104  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,235
I flew on Pan Am 747 to LHR a few time back in the day. Was flying non-rev so was in coach. I always wanted to be able to sit 'upstairs.'
Kensterfly is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 7:14 pm
  #105  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AA EXP; UA 1MM & PP; Marriott AMB; Hyatt Globalist; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 62,263
Originally Posted by halls120
J on the upper deck of a 747 is the best business ride in the UA fleet, bar none.
My favorite, too. I love the side storage bins at the window seats.
Kacee is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.