http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...4238321365.jpg
:eek: Good PR UA! And the flight crew stayed at a hotel and would not answer questions. No food provided for many hours. 2 blankets given to each PX. |
Hundreds of men, women and children have been abandoned at remote barracks in Canada for 20 hours so far after their United Airlines flight from Chicago to London made an emergency landing.
:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by cfischer
(Post 24966286)
they have UA2135 (4hr late due to incompetence) and UA2065 (3 hrs late due to operations :rolleyes: = maintenance) running YYR --> EWR tonight. UA will surely double the usual 5k 'we are sorry' miles this time :rolleyes:
|
Did the FC / C PX get to stay in the hotel? Why no food or communications from UA?
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...4235088073.jpg I love it! |
Honestly, could they not get another aircraft from EWR in the air as soon as they find out about the diversion. Is it really that hard. Aircraft from EWR could've been there in a few hours. This is very very sad UA. Pathetic.
|
If the mechanics are doing this on purpose (seems possible), they're only shooting themselves in the foot. This isn't how you will get better contracts.
Originally Posted by LASUA1K
(Post 24966314)
Honestly, could they not get another aircraft from EWR in the air as soon as they find out about the diversion. Is it really that hard. Aircraft from EWR could've been there in a few hours. This is very very sad UA. Pathetic.
|
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
(Post 24966301)
Well, those folks had food and warm beds. Kinda makes a difference. ..
And I am surprised nobody got frostbite in fairly mild weather, indoors with only 2 blankets. The place is of course heated, but likely the locals turned it off because the weather was so warm. Also noted that one source in the Daily Mail rant was very complimentary of the local workers. I guess they did not realize that these are the hands on the ground the UA (or any airline diverting there) has. |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 24966167)
You've got to love the photo of the ten foot deep snow drifts, despite it now being June.
Still, sounds like a pretty miserable experience. |
Originally Posted by trilinearmipmap
(Post 24966281)
If it is good enough for Canadian armed forces personnel who risk their lives to defend us, it is good enough for these overcoddled whiners.
It's a silly comparison |
Originally Posted by minnyfly
(Post 24966332)
If the mechanics are doing this on purpose (seems possible), they're only shooting themselves in the foot. This isn't how you will get better contracts.
You need a spare plane and crew available. Not something you just have at the ready or round up in a couple minutes. At least the people onboard didn't divert into the Atlantic. The situation was handled poorly. |
Originally Posted by wanderingkev
(Post 24966553)
Because they signed up for it and did not pay for 000's of dollars for the privilege of missing weddings meetings and connections,
It's a silly comparison But United has set low (sub-80%) OT goals as anything more is "diminishing returns" and they are reaping the whirlwind at this point for their choices. |
Originally Posted by trilinearmipmap
(Post 24966281)
If it is good enough for Canadian armed forces personnel who risk their lives to defend us, it is good enough for these overcoddled whiners.
It is the way UA handled the problem. They put the crew in a hotel and the PAX in a military dorm. They did not feed or communicate to the PAX for many hours. This is a complete FAIL on UA. The worse part is UA shuttling folks back to EWR from Goose Bay, not onto LHR. That is a major FAIL! UA is hitting the skids on all fronts! :td: This management team needs to learn how to treat people (your customers who pay your salary). Don't treat us like cattle. Shame! |
I would be upset if it ate into a trip, but if I were just coming home I probably would take it in stride as a travel adventure. |
Originally Posted by JVPhoto
(Post 24966179)
Were the "barracks" on the airport property so they didn't have to clear immigration? Assuming somehow the FAs/crew did to get to the hotel...were pax not allowed to leave and make their own accom if they wanted?
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 24966195)
That would be my guess.
Canada immigration is really strict. Has United responded at all about this? Or gone into hiding? |
Nothing about this (poor maintenance, lack of a backup plan, lack of caring for customers, lack of taking action when needed) surprises me anymore.
Just when I start to feel good about the better treatment I have been getting from FAs, UA management shows its true colors. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:00 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.