Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA Will Never be a World-Class Airline Until They Get Rid of CRJs on Major Routes.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UA Will Never be a World-Class Airline Until They Get Rid of CRJs on Major Routes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2015, 10:50 am
  #211  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by Kmxu
I would argue that UA will never be a leading airlines that customers will choose to fly if customers have to take care themselves when something goes wrong. For example, my PEK-ORD flight was delayed for more than one hour at PEK last Saturday. The connection time at ORD was less than 1 hour (International to Domestic MCT is 90 min). No protection was offered. For my segment (ORD-IAD), the delay were lengthened by an increment of 15 min. My connection time at IAD were down to 20 min when boarding started. Still no protection flight was offered. I chose not to call UA Premier Line because the blocked time for the ORD-IAD was 2 hours (for < 600 miles). If UA offered me a direct flight (ORD-ORF), I would have taken it although I would arrive at home one hour later than my connection flights. Another point one can argue is the dismayed operation. For my latest trip, the on-time percentage is 20% (even I doubled the DOT 15 min requirement). Four of five flights arrived 30 min or longer behind the scheduled arrival time.
Is this a post about RJ's? You kind of lost me...

Where was your latest trip (with 20% OT) in to and out of on what dates? What was the source of the long delays?
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2015, 2:05 pm
  #212  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lake Tahoe
Programs: UA Gold, Marriott Plat, Hyatt Discoverist, Hertz PC, Avis PC, National Exec
Posts: 54
Looks like Reno to SFO is upgrading, at least until end of September. The midweek daily schedule shows:

Current
- 4 x CRJ200
- 2 x CRJ400

July - September
- 2 x mix of CRJ200 or CRJ700
- 2 x mix 737-800 or Airbus 319

I haven't flown anything bigger than an RJ on UA on this route in years.
bocasierra is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2015, 4:52 pm
  #213  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ORD-LAS
Programs: UA MM 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,419
Originally Posted by bocasierra
Looks like Reno to SFO is upgrading, at least until end of September. The midweek daily schedule shows:

Current
- 4 x CRJ200
- 2 x CRJ400

July - September
- 2 x mix of CRJ200 or CRJ700
- 2 x mix 737-800 or Airbus 319

I haven't flown anything bigger than an RJ on UA on this route in years.
I miss the 757 on that route. Take off in the evening was an absolute joy!!
LASUA1K is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2015, 5:36 pm
  #214  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Suburban Philadelphia
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,392
I've noticed my CVG-EWR evening flight gets upgraded to a E170 soon. good stuff.
Cargojon is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2015, 8:42 pm
  #215  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BOS
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, DL PM/1MM, Marriott Amb/LT Titanium, HHonors Diamond, Priority Club Platinum, Hyatt Disc
Posts: 522
Originally Posted by spin88
I am curious what type of plane it was? I have mostly flown DL in F, but the few times in Y (757, 767, 738/9, A320 ex NW) I have found the seats to be good, much better than the slim lines on the UA Airbuses which are IMHE the worst seat I have ever had the displeasure of sitting on a mainline plane). I find the Recaro (UA) seats to be far far worse than anything I have ever sat in, they are just the pits.
Ok. This is really annoying. I have boarding passes, a receipt, reservation/ticket confirmation, and an itinerary printed by a DL kiosk. Nothing lists the type of a/c. When I checked the past weekend, flightaware only went back 4 months and that flight number is no longer for BOS-DTW but when it was, it was either a B738 (Sat 2/7), A319 or A319L. 2/12 was the last day it was BOS-DTW

If someone else is more motivated or wants to call DL directly to see if they can get the info, it was DL 1583 BOS-DTW on Sat Jan 17.
wtigerFF is offline  
Old Jul 1, 2015, 8:57 pm
  #216  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Springfield,MO,USA
Programs: UA 1K MM, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,604
In looking at the flight status for my flight today on a United Express/Skywest CRJ200 I noticed that united.com has been mis-stating the seat width to be 18.5 inches:

Aircraft:

Bombardier CRJ200
Capacity: 50 United Economy®
Cruise Speed: 520 mph
Propulsion: Two General Electric CF34-3B1 turbofan engines, rated at 8,729 pounds of thrust each
Wingspan: 69 feet, 7 inches

Seating:

United Economy®: 2-2 seating layout. Most seats have a 18.5 inch width and 31 inches of pitch.
u600213 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2015, 12:59 pm
  #217  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 6
These types of things almost always come to down to the debate of more frequency with smaller aircraft or less with larger. I personally prefer more frequency. If a CRJ is doing a route, it can't possibly be that long. My time is more valuable than being marginally more comfortable on a 1.5hr flight.

I'd rather be home than staying overnight somewhere or waiting out a 6hr layover.

That being said: I loathe CRJ-100/200s. Canadian Torture Tubes. CRJ 700-900 isn't much better. Sure there's a small amount of F, but I wouldn't pay for it out of pocket and I'm not too high on the upgrade list.

E-Jets seem to be the best. In my opinion they're more comfortable than a 737/A320 at least for Y.

E-145s are marginally better than CRJ-200. At least the A seat is a single.
Mandalorian is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2015, 3:51 pm
  #218  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by Mandalorian
If a CRJ is doing a route, it can't possibly be that long. My time is more valuable than being marginally more comfortable on a 1.5hr flight.
If 1.5 hours was the longest CRJ flight, then I thing most people would agree with you.

However...

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...lights-rj.html
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2015, 6:36 pm
  #219  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 6
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
If 1.5 hours was the longest CRJ flight, then I thing most people would agree with you.

However...

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...lights-rj.html
I was using that number as the average.
Mandalorian is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.