Last edit by: J.Edward
Related New Articles for United/Orbitz vs. Skiplagged.com
(Mod Note: While some FTers have chosen to contribute to skiplagged's legal defense we request a direct link to do so not be placed in the wiki.)
(Mod Note: While some FTers have chosen to contribute to skiplagged's legal defense we request a direct link to do so not be placed in the wiki.)
UA sues "hidden city" search site Skiplagged.com
#166
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok or San Francisco
Programs: United 1k, Marriott Lifetime PE, Former DL Gold, Former SQ Solitaire, HH Gold
Posts: 11,886
remember that just because the airline says it's illegal to not fly hub-bbb it doesn't automatically means it is.....
I don't use hidden city but I did in the past and already booked in the future some RT with the intention of only flying one way, and I couldn't care less what the airline thinks of it
I don't use hidden city but I did in the past and already booked in the future some RT with the intention of only flying one way, and I couldn't care less what the airline thinks of it
If I don't care what the 7-11 down the street thinks can I walk in and grab a 6-pack and walk out?
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Dec 30, 2014 at 8:07 pm Reason: quote updated to reflect mod edit
#167
Join Date: Jan 2012
Programs: UA Gold MM, HHonors Gold, Hertz Five Star Gold, Marriott Gold, Avis First
Posts: 462
#168
Join Date: Dec 2009
Programs: United 1K Hilton Gold
Posts: 139
And if some kid makes a website exposing that which 7-11s are selling Cokes for 99 cents a can or $2.99 a six-pack, they won't get sued for encouraging someone who wants four Cokes to buy a six-pack.
I gave the kid $10. I don't think he'll win, but with enough money it might just get enough media attention to expose this corrupt, greedy and irrational practice the airlines have been doing for decades to the general public.
#169
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: 1K, MM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 427
Do you really believe that a credit card company will allow a payment to UAL to go thru when I can prove I already paid for the leg they want to charge me for? Highly doubtful. Only UAL...please bar me from flying...that could be an interesting lawsuit which in this day are hundreds of ways to show discrimination...nasty slope for UAL.
#170
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: PSP LAX OMA ORD
Programs: All of 'em
Posts: 282
I wouldn't be surprised - but will be amused and disgusted at the same time - if Zaman himself is another 20-something "global traveler" who isn't a member of any FF prog or heard of them and how they work. I imagine his typical user demo are people who book, fly and land. And that's it - no sense of investment, nothing.
Again, just my theory. Generally speaking, I'm with those that think United is shooting him in error as the messenger.
#171
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: KAUS
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 1,118
Never used the site but would be happy to make a modest contribution to its legal defense fund.
The mere fact that such ticketing practices are pervasive enough to create a market for such a service reeks of an under-regulated market to me.
Make the airlines price point-to-point (each flight) consistently, and kill EAS (and other public ticket price subsidies) in all but the most extreme cases. Then hope that robust regional markets and, eventually, larger competition ultimately result.... through elimination of subsidies but also new and more pricing regulation.
What is this thing that those lumbersexuals talk about? Disruptive technologies?
The mere fact that such ticketing practices are pervasive enough to create a market for such a service reeks of an under-regulated market to me.
Make the airlines price point-to-point (each flight) consistently, and kill EAS (and other public ticket price subsidies) in all but the most extreme cases. Then hope that robust regional markets and, eventually, larger competition ultimately result.... through elimination of subsidies but also new and more pricing regulation.
What is this thing that those lumbersexuals talk about? Disruptive technologies?
#172
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K2MM, HH Diamond (LT), Mar Plat, Avis First
Posts: 122
Safety or Security Concerns?
I read all the post poop pooping safety concerns like it all make up as false pretense but consider these operational concerns.
If a passenger is missing from the flight that he is checked in (count is off), the airlines usually has to determine who the person is, did he check luggage? if yes, the luggage may need to be pulled, depending on the circumstances (miss-connection, skipped last leg). If miss-connection or other unpublished reasons, the luggage will continue, if for unknown reasons, the luggage is pulled. That a lot of background work going on to determine action to take when a checked in passenger is missing from the flight.
Do posters that questions the fares really believes that it the fares to these small airports can be as low as they are, cheaper than flying to the hub. That if the fare to the small airport is the correct fare, then they are being ripped off for the flight to the hub, because the flt to the hub is costing them more. Do anyone consider that the smaller airport would not have any flights if the true cost were charged. Many of the smaller airport have such small number of flights as it is. True cost would drive the number down to zero. Do posters considered that the smaller airport can be receiving indirect subsidies?
I read all the post poop pooping safety concerns like it all make up as false pretense but consider these operational concerns.
If a passenger is missing from the flight that he is checked in (count is off), the airlines usually has to determine who the person is, did he check luggage? if yes, the luggage may need to be pulled, depending on the circumstances (miss-connection, skipped last leg). If miss-connection or other unpublished reasons, the luggage will continue, if for unknown reasons, the luggage is pulled. That a lot of background work going on to determine action to take when a checked in passenger is missing from the flight.
Do posters that questions the fares really believes that it the fares to these small airports can be as low as they are, cheaper than flying to the hub. That if the fare to the small airport is the correct fare, then they are being ripped off for the flight to the hub, because the flt to the hub is costing them more. Do anyone consider that the smaller airport would not have any flights if the true cost were charged. Many of the smaller airport have such small number of flights as it is. True cost would drive the number down to zero. Do posters considered that the smaller airport can be receiving indirect subsidies?
#173
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 107
At the end of the day, he exposes a loop hole in the airline pricing structure. United is clearly the bully here.
Last edited by Flyer1M; Dec 30, 2014 at 10:07 pm
#174
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok or San Francisco
Programs: United 1k, Marriott Lifetime PE, Former DL Gold, Former SQ Solitaire, HH Gold
Posts: 11,886
No matter how you try to slice it, the airline is making you 2 offers. Itinerary A for $X or itinerary B for more than $X. You pay for itinerary A and fly itinerary B you are dishonest. Simple as that.
Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Dec 31, 2014 at 3:11 am Reason: multi-quote should be used
#175
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
#176
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,857
TOPIC REMINDER
As a UA MP Forum thread this thread is on UA (& Orbitz) suing "hidden city" search site Skiplagged.com -- as the title forumulated. Lots of peripheral / related issues -- but let's keep the discussion related to the original subject and how it might relate to us as UA flyers and not wandering off into OMNI discussions (such as six-packs or popsicles at 7-11 or broader subject of HCT).
WineCountryUA
UA coModerators
#177
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
United isn't asking a flyer to pay a bill for an increased fare before doing business with them.
United is asking for a legal remedy against a 3rd party for interfering with their contract. One of Skiplagged's defenses will be that the contract terms United is alleging Skiplagged is interfering with aren't enforceable to begin with, at which point United will have to argue that they are, and the court will have to rule whether they are.
If the case isn't settled, it will be.
They can't possibly be doing that, since no contract exists to violate.
It's not one sided. You agree to certain things. The airline agrees to certain things.
Come on, guys. This is not rocket science.
There are rules.
United doesn't get to write any rule they want. Well, I guess they can write it, but that doesn't mean anybody else will necessarily enforce it.
In the extreme case, if I contract with you to sacrifice my son in exchange for $100, and my brother comes along and convinces me not to sacrifice my son, you won't have any success in taking my brother to court for interfering in the contract because the contract was never an enforceable contract.
If I don't care what the 7-11 down the street thinks can I walk in and grab a 6-pack and walk out?
If you own a store and post a policy that any customer has to pay for their beer before removing it from the cooler, and they must do 10 jumping jacks before they can take the beer they just paid for from the cooler, and after they pay I tell them we're in a hurry and just take the beer and we leave, do you think any court in the land is going to determine your contract was violated?
Of course not, they're going to tell you your terms were silly.
But if you open up a box of popsicles or something like that and take four and the others are marked "not for individual consumption" they couldn't sell them to another customer. Instead they have additional work to clean up the mess you made. And their computerized inventory tracking system now has bad information which could cause them losses in the future.
You staked out a position. It's obvious it's not correct, cut your losses.
No matter how you try to slice it, the airline is making you 2 offers. Itinerary A for $X or itinerary B for more than $X. You pay for itinerary A and fly itinerary B you are dishonest. Simple as that.
Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Dec 31, 2014 at 3:12 am Reason: 3x merge
#178
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: My opinions are my own and not that of my employer(s)
Posts: 1,411
Google here's your chance to step in for the little guy buy him out for a couple thousand and position yourself to overtake all other OTAs....
No Airline has the available resources to challenge Google's bucks.
No Airline has the available resources to challenge Google's bucks.
#179
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Programs: United 1K,Marriott Platinum Premier,IHC Platinum Ambassador,Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,898
UA is going to win this one..When you purchase a ticket you enter into a contract to fly from point A to B..If you try to scam and get away with violating the contract it will catch up with you..UA has every right to sue and close MP accounts of those it identifies as scammers..Jmho :-::-:
#180
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 97
UA is going to win this one..When you purchase a ticket you enter into a contract to fly from point A to B..If you try to scam and get away with violating the contract it will catch up with you..UA has every right to sue and close MP accounts of those it identifies as scammers..Jmho :-::-:
what if you find out at the hub that your meeting at destination is cxxld? what if you have to turn around and go home due to an emergency? what if you have diarrhea of biblical proportions at the hub and can't fly onwards?
trying to prove in every instance that this is done that the passenger is a scammer is practically impossible