Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Changes to UA's IAD-HNL Service (Schedule, Equipment, etc.)?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Changes to UA's IAD-HNL Service (Schedule, Equipment, etc.)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2013, 3:05 pm
  #16  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Originally Posted by hobo13
So essentially, CO took over and thought they knew more about what routes would work from UA hubs than UA knew themselves.....

And now they retreat.

Yes we've been told on these forums, repeatedly, about how much better CO is analyzing the profitability of a route, rightsizing equipment, and all that jazz.

Wonder how that 737 on SIN-HKG is working out....
Well that 738 is back to a 747 , and when I was on it it was Empty. So as much as we like the 747 over the 738, unless they are selling tkts on that route CO was probably correct in using the 738, since if most folks are simply as I did using it as a way to get a HKG & SIN stops onto 1 tkt for the price of a HKG tkt , it doesnt make any sense to me

Any carrier has to do what will increase its bottom line and not what will be a better flight for its Elites
craz is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 3:15 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: Star Alliance Gold/UA Mileage Plus Premier 1K
Posts: 257
Originally Posted by bk3day
Just came off HNL-IAD & it was fully booked as was the IAD-HNL last Thursday.

Don't think any F were available for CPU
I was on this roundtrip in February. Totally full in both directions, available every day. must be seasonal; i'm looking at jan and Feb 2014 and the flight is there

Originally Posted by JetAway
I've been on this flight twice and it's been packed and I have another one coming up in April that also looks very full. Late August until the week before Christmas is a very slow travel season for Hawaii in general so it makes sense to cut back the flights during this period. However, the non-stops re-appear in late December so it seems they are not discontinued, only "seasonally-adjusted."

BTW-as someone from the DC area, the Caribbean is NOT a first choice "warm" destination for most residents.
+1. And why would DC-area folks go to Hawaii? Well, it's lovely, and it's far. This is flyertalk - it's approx 10K miles for that itin!

Last edited by iluv2fly; Mar 19, 2013 at 3:36 pm Reason: merge
geofflaredo is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 3:22 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ORD-LAS
Programs: UA MM 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,419
Originally Posted by craz
Well that 738 is back to a 747 , and when I was on it it was Empty. So as much as we like the 747 over the 738, unless they are selling tkts on that route CO was probably correct in using the 738, since if most folks are simply as I did using it as a way to get a HKG & SIN stops onto 1 tkt for the price of a HKG tkt , it doesnt make any sense to me

Any carrier has to do what will increase its bottom line and not what will be a better flight for its Elites
They drove all the business away! I was on that route frequently in the past, and it was full in all cabins.
LASUA1K is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 4:22 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold-MM, AA Gold-MM, F9-Silver, Hyatt Something, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,393
Originally Posted by craz

Any carrier has to do what will increase its bottom line and not what will be a better flight for its Elites
Interesting how you so emphatically assume that these are mutually exclusive.
hobo13 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 4:29 pm
  #20  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Originally Posted by LASUA1K
They drove all the business away! I was on that route frequently in the past, and it was full in all cabins.
Full of HKG-SIN-HKG passengers who purchased that tkt, or add ons like I was. By adding SIN onto my HKG tkt it was all of $40 more! So if CO checked and saw basically all they were doing is ferrying those who were flying US-HKG onto SIN then they were correct for using the 738

The problem is we dont have a way to know how many HKG-SIN-HKG tkts they were selling

OT but CO for yrs Refused to put E+ onto their planes saying it was throwing $$ out the window.Once they were able to look at UAs books they learnt very fast how Wrong they were.

Point is I dont blame whoever made the decission to use the 738.They knew the #s and felt it ws the correct decission , OK in the end it seems it wasnt, but none of us were against the 738 since it was better profit wise we just didnt want a narrow-body for that length of a flight. Do you know anyone that prefers an RJ over a mainliner I dont. Yet many routes have been downgraded to an RJ.

Really OT but both LH and BA Downgraded their widebodys to Only A-320 series to TLV. Everyone yelled they wont fly BA or LH any longer yet it seems they are still filling their planes on that route. My pt is ALL carriers are trying to utilize their fleet to the max that they can. Could be BA/LH felt they would maintain their full fare passengers and all theyd lose would be the lesiure traveler who really didnt trickle much to the bottom line anyway. Wouldnt surprise me if CO was thinking along those same lines, Except it seems it didnt pan out as they had hoped it would.

Has CO lost its LAX/SFO - HI biz, after all its now mainly 738,753 seems no they havent at least from the times I flew it or was looking to fly to HI.Which probably will end up giving them more to their bottom line. CO wont be right all the time and they know that, so what should they do listen to us who Only want planes with F & C no Y and all bed-seats at the price of a G fare, or to play with the planes and routes and try to squeeze what they can out of each route

As an Elite passenger I want widebodys with bed-seats for the price of a G fare or a W and being able to confirm an UP then and there. If I was running UA Id want the opposite and not fill up my Premium cabins with ElCheapo tkt passengers and thusly not beable maybe to sell that seat to someone for alot more $$$. I dont know of any shareholder that will say Jeff should go back to PMUAs ways of leaving the barn door open and giving everything away for $0 or close to that
craz is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 4:36 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
Hawaii is in the US and the Caribbean isn't. That gets you a much better tax treatment on "business" trips (cough conferences cough vacations) to Hawaii.
raehl311 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 4:39 pm
  #22  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Originally Posted by hobo13
Interesting how you so emphatically assume that these are mutually exclusive.
In most cases I believe they are
craz is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 4:44 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold-MM, AA Gold-MM, F9-Silver, Hyatt Something, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,393
Originally Posted by craz
In most cases I believe they are
So what is good for elites is not good for profits?

In that case, why even have a frequent flyer program?

Just tell those GS'es to 'get outta here. You're a drain on profits!'
hobo13 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 5:21 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: United
Posts: 256
Originally Posted by halls120
Most people in the DC area who want to escape to warm climates don't go to Hawaii. Why would you want to go 10 hours away when in 3-4 hours you are in the Caribbean?
Interesting how you so emphatically assume that these are mutually exclusive. Sorry, couldn't resist.

In all fairness I think many folks want to visit different warm weather vacation spots in different years, ranging from Hawaii to Mexico to the Caribbean. That's certainly true of my friends in D.C., granted they go to Hawaii much more rarely than to the Caribbean because of distance and budget.

BTW, Hawaii tourism and visitor counts have recovered back to pre-crisis record levels, and apparently people from both coasts do want to go to Hawaii. Here are the visitor counts from West Coast and East Coast and elsewhere:

CATEGORY AND MMA Dec 2012 Dec 2011 % change YTD 2012 YTD 2011 % change
VISITOR ARRIVALS 733,709 690,090 6.3 7,998,815 7,299,048 9.6
Total by air 724,163 670,116 8.1 7,837,194 7,174,397 9.2
U.S. West 289,301 265,853 8.8 3,194,975 2,994,731 6.7
U.S. East 149,403 144,187 3.6 1,699,124 1,642,279 3.5
Japan 120,116 114,001 5.4 1,452,563 1,241,805 17.0
Canada 66,897 65,445 2.2 498,241 477,564 4.3
All Others 98,446 80,630 22.1 992,291 818,018 21.3
Visitor arrivals by cruise ships 9,546 19,974 -52.2 161,621 124,651 29.7
wwu123 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 5:44 pm
  #25  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,857
Using the code, /code tags improves the readability of tables
Code:
CATEGORY AND MMA    Dec 2012   Dec 2011 % change   YTD 2012    YTD 2011 % change
VISITOR ARRIVALS    733,709    690,090     6.3     7,998,815   7,299,048  9.6
Total by air        724,163    670,116     8.1     7,837,194   7,174,397  9.2
U.S. West           289,301    265,853     8.8     3,194,975   2,994,731  6.7
U.S. East           149,403    144,187     3.6     1,699,124   1,642,279  3.5
Japan               120,116    114,001     5.4     1,452,563   1,241,805 17.0
Canada               66,897     65,445     2.2       498,241     477,564  4.3
All Others           98,446     80,630    22.1       992,291     818,018 21.3
Visitor arrivals by cruise ships 
                      9,546     19,974   -52.2       161,621     124,651 29.7
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 6:06 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CLE
Programs: UA,WN,AA,DL, B6
Posts: 4,169
EWR-HNL probably gets much more local passengers from the NYC market and IAD would depend more on those connecting and one issue is many have to fly a backwards or non direct routing to take this flight. ORD and IAH also DEN, LAX, and SFO are better alternatives.
buckeyefanflyer is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 6:07 pm
  #27  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,604
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
would that apply to EWR?
people in DC are smarter.

Originally Posted by JetAway
BTW-as someone from the DC area, the Caribbean is NOT a first choice "warm" destination for most residents.
Yep, that's why there are so many flights every winter from the DC area to the Caribbean.

Originally Posted by wwu123
Interesting how you so emphatically assume that these are mutually exclusive. Sorry, couldn't resist.

In all fairness I think many folks want to visit different warm weather vacation spots in different years, ranging from Hawaii to Mexico to the Caribbean. That's certainly true of my friends in D.C., granted they go to Hawaii much more rarely than to the Caribbean because of distance and budget.

Thank you for stating the obvious.

I've lived in the DC area for 21 years now. We've been to Hawaii twice in those 21 years. We've been to the Caribbean 7 times.

Don't get me wrong, we love Hawaii. But you don't decide to pop out to Hawaii for a four day weekend. You do in the Caribbean.

Last edited by halls120; Mar 19, 2013 at 6:13 pm
halls120 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 6:09 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by craz
Well that 738 is back to a 747 , and when I was on it it was Empty. So as much as we like the 747 over the 738, unless they are selling tkts on that route CO was probably correct in using the 738, since if most folks are simply as I did using it as a way to get a HKG & SIN stops onto 1 tkt for the price of a HKG tkt , it doesnt make any sense to me

Any carrier has to do what will increase its bottom line and not what will be a better flight for its Elites
I think this is the sort of short sighted view that CO managment takes, looking at each leg and saying "hey, these folks have to fly us, after all we are special..." Well, there is a lot of traffic from the US to Singapore. And nearly all traffic changes planes going to SIN, and most of it changes planes in HKG as the flight times work best. And a lot of that traffic is PAID F/C, either on corporate accounts or just people buying tickets. UA has showers and a IFL at HKG, why???? Its because they get connecting passengers to SIN and BKK.

Those folks who are paying 6-12K for their tickets suddenly found themselves ending up on a CO 738, and amazingly did not ever want to fly UA again.

revenue just dropped off the map, and not just on the HKG-SIN, but more importantly on the USA-HKG routes.

Decision was reversed, but the damage was done. Many of those folks are now flying on SQ or CX.

Originally Posted by LASUA1K
They drove all the business away! I was on that route frequently in the past, and it was full in all cabins.
Yup. The flight made sense because of who was in F/C, and that it is expensive to overnight an aircraft at HKG.

Originally Posted by craz
Full of HKG-SIN-HKG passengers who purchased that tkt, or add ons like I was. By adding SIN onto my HKG tkt it was all of $40 more! So if CO checked and saw basically all they were doing is ferrying those who were flying US-HKG onto SIN then they were correct for using the 738

The problem is we dont have a way to know how many HKG-SIN-HKG tkts they were selling

OT but CO for yrs Refused to put E+ onto their planes saying it was throwing $$ out the window.Once they were able to look at UAs books they learnt very fast how Wrong they were.

Point is I dont blame whoever made the decission to use the 738.They knew the #s and felt it ws the correct decission , OK in the end it seems it wasnt, but none of us were against the 738 since it was better profit wise we just didnt want a narrow-body for that length of a flight. Do you know anyone that prefers an RJ over a mainliner I dont. Yet many routes have been downgraded to an RJ.

Really OT but both LH and BA Downgraded their widebodys to Only A-320 series to TLV. Everyone yelled they wont fly BA or LH any longer yet it seems they are still filling their planes on that route. My pt is ALL carriers are trying to utilize their fleet to the max that they can. Could be BA/LH felt they would maintain their full fare passengers and all theyd lose would be the lesiure traveler who really didnt trickle much to the bottom line anyway. Wouldnt surprise me if CO was thinking along those same lines, Except it seems it didnt pan out as they had hoped it would.

Has CO lost its LAX/SFO - HI biz, after all its now mainly 738,753 seems no they havent at least from the times I flew it or was looking to fly to HI.Which probably will end up giving them more to their bottom line. CO wont be right all the time and they know that, so what should they do listen to us who Only want planes with F & C no Y and all bed-seats at the price of a G fare, or to play with the planes and routes and try to squeeze what they can out of each route

As an Elite passenger I want widebodys with bed-seats for the price of a G fare or a W and being able to confirm an UP then and there. If I was running UA Id want the opposite and not fill up my Premium cabins with ElCheapo tkt passengers and thusly not beable maybe to sell that seat to someone for alot more $$$. I dont know of any shareholder that will say Jeff should go back to PMUAs ways of leaving the barn door open and giving everything away for $0 or close to that
Overall COdbaUA is doing very very poorly in revenue performance. They are down 4-5% month after month to AA/DL in PRASM (and in yeild). This is about $450M in revenue lost per quarter, so evidently lots of folks don't like flying on the barbie-jets or the 737 for all of their flights.

And I'm not sure that the TLV flights are comparable, there are lots of low cost airlines that serve the markets, its mostly low paying passengers, and its only like 2100 miles from TLV to FRA.
spin88 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 6:53 pm
  #29  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: UA PP, AA, DL, BA, CX, SPG, HHonors
Posts: 2,002
Originally Posted by zoegksf
Which is why I think HA will eventually pull out of JFK and the fares will go back up to pre-HA levels. Nobody can be making money on $450.00rt's on that route.
Nooooo .... I depend on those loss leaders to requal 1K with little or nearly no money
787fan is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2013, 6:56 pm
  #30  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Originally Posted by hobo13
So what is good for elites is not good for profits?

In that case, why even have a frequent flyer program?

Just tell those GS'es to 'get outta here. You're a drain on profits!'
The program is there just to sucker us in. The Genie is already out of the bottle and they wont beable to put it back in = dump the program.So they will do the next best thing tighten it up so that those with the Spend will get teh beenies and those w/o wont get what they were to till now (which the Hotel programs with their recent devaluations is basically doing)

In our case a GS will simply book SQ for the HKG-SIN flight and still be in C or F.Its those on the ElCheapos that will suffer (and that includes Me)

Sorry but excluding the GSs and x # of 1Ks most of us are in fact OverEntitled Elites

Last edited by craz; Mar 19, 2013 at 9:43 pm
craz is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.