2 777's clip wings at IAD
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SFO/JFK/MGA
Programs: UA 1P MM, AA-PP, AS, DL, HH G, SPG Gold, TA nada
Posts: 2,043
2 777's clip wings at IAD
Just what UA doesn't need now that the 'game-changer' are out of commission too. Another possible shortage of WB's ala CO.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ngs-at-dulles/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ngs-at-dulles/
#3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: ABE
Programs: DL DM, IHG Spire, Mariott Platinum (UA SI) Avis First, National Executive
Posts: 764
Those gates at Dulles are horrid. Still cannot believe that they would park two 777s side by side.
I don't know... I think that UA should just fly out of there domestically only. Other than the locals who might get inconvenienced, EWR is a much more modern airport and allows for shorter connection times as well (and will get even better when UA abandons terminal A)
I don't know... I think that UA should just fly out of there domestically only. Other than the locals who might get inconvenienced, EWR is a much more modern airport and allows for shorter connection times as well (and will get even better when UA abandons terminal A)
#5
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Washington, D.C.
Programs: AAdvantage, Mileage Plus
Posts: 45
My friend's flight UA 924 to LHR has been cancelled. UA didn't provide any explanation. Interestingly, the aircraft supposedly flying 924 is currently on its way to BRU as 950. I guess they "turned around" the plane and fulfilled that route?
#6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Virginia (IAD)
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 228
Those gates at Dulles are horrid. Still cannot believe that they would park two 777s side by side.
I don't know... I think that UA should just fly out of there domestically only. Other than the locals who might get inconvenienced, EWR is a much more modern airport and allows for shorter connection times as well (and will get even better when UA abandons terminal A)
I don't know... I think that UA should just fly out of there domestically only. Other than the locals who might get inconvenienced, EWR is a much more modern airport and allows for shorter connection times as well (and will get even better when UA abandons terminal A)
When they are short a bird, the TATL segment with the lowest load factor of the night is likely to get whacked. Plus, there are fewer onward connections from LHR and plenty of birds back to the US the next day to make up for the lost seats on the return. So, either 918 or 924 gets cut in this instance.
#7
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: IAD
Programs: UA GS, 1MM; Marriott Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 561
With DC being a very international city - federal gov't, embassies, and etc- UAs international traffic seems warranted. If UA wasnt flying to CDG or MUC, I would never fly to EWR to transfer.
#8
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SLC
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 493
https://mobile.twitter.com/cmartinez...755072/photo/1
#9
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: ABE
Programs: DL DM, IHG Spire, Mariott Platinum (UA SI) Avis First, National Executive
Posts: 764
again... the locals might suffer through a connection. Like the locals in CLE are suffering, for example. That airport if you are not a local is horrid. Period.
(And I'd rather connect through CLE overseas that IAD any day.)
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
I have to assume that someone was at the wrong gate or someone painted some new lines in the wrong place. Incidents like this don't just "happen," they result from costly negligence by someone.
#12
Join Date: May 2001
Location: IAD
Posts: 6,148
Those gates at Dulles are horrid. Still cannot believe that they would park two 777s side by side.
I don't know... I think that UA should just fly out of there domestically only. Other than the locals who might get inconvenienced, EWR is a much more modern airport and allows for shorter connection times as well (and will get even better when UA abandons terminal A)
I don't know... I think that UA should just fly out of there domestically only. Other than the locals who might get inconvenienced, EWR is a much more modern airport and allows for shorter connection times as well (and will get even better when UA abandons terminal A)
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,645
anyone know the tail numbers? i am flying 772 on Saturday and i will come uncorked if my BF upgrade gets dropped on non-lie-flat metal.
#14
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: People's Republic of HotTubistan
Posts: 1,408
N773UA was the frame coming from BRU; it's o/s (hence 924's cancellation). Nothing I can see on the aircraft that was struck -- everything else operating as planned...............
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174