Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Changes coming to NRT - SIN flights.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 5:04 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
United playing musical chairs for NRT configurations!

First they remove one of the 747 configurations (March 30, 2013), now my flight to Singapore from NRT is a 777-200 with no first class! Called to request refund and she was surprised to see a non-first class flight on that route as well.

Any one else see this new configuration? This is UA7 NRT to SIN (April 7th).
zcycl1052 is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 5:08 pm
  #62  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
30 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 27,016
Please follow this thread in the UA Forum.
Obscure2k
TravelBuzz Moderator
obscure2k is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 5:25 pm
  #63  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Plat, 1MM
Posts: 2,181
More discussion of this here:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...n-flights.html
FortFun is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 6:19 pm
  #64  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 62,533
Changes coming to NRT - SIN flights.

Even the flight numbers are whack. Why bother merging if cannot commingle anything but the bad stuff (like the coffee, or 737s)
uastarflyer is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 6:21 pm
  #65  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,488
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
Even the flight numbers are whack. Why bother merging if cannot commingle anything but the bad stuff (like the coffee, or 737s)
Flight 7 originates in IAH.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 7:35 pm
  #66  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 62,533
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
Even the flight numbers are whack. Why bother merging if cannot commingle anything but the bad stuff (like the coffee, or 737s)
Flight 7 originates in IAH.
Make it 8xx is what I am saying. Or align sUA 8xx to a new scheme. There used to be some consistency of 9xx Europe and 8xx Asia/Pacufic. Now it is all over the place.
uastarflyer is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 7:49 pm
  #67  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,488
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
Make it 8xx is what I am saying. Or align sUA 8xx to a new scheme. There used to be some consistency of 9xx Europe and 8xx Asia/Pacufic. Now it is all over the place.
But since it will be sCO 777 operating the NRT - SIN flight, The flight # would have to fall under the sCO half of the flight number system.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 8:31 pm
  #68  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WAS, LAX, or on AS 5/6
Programs: AS Titanium
Posts: 1,346
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28:19461112

But since it will be sCO 777 operating the NRT - SIN flight, The flight # would have to fall under the sCO half of the flight number system.
Although, as you noted in the other routing changes thread, this too shall be changing with the introduction of a sUA 763 operating IAD - MUC as UA 1.

Last edited by flyingmusicianlax; Oct 8, 2012 at 8:41 pm
flyingmusicianlax is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 8:33 pm
  #69  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 16,221
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
Make it 8xx is what I am saying. Or align sUA 8xx to a new scheme. There used to be some consistency of 9xx Europe and 8xx Asia/Pacufic. Now it is all over the place.
Does it really make that much of a difference? Having consistent flight numbers like you suggest would be nice, but they've just made it consistent in a different way (sCO vs. sUA). Besides, while accelerated since the merger, many of the flight numbering schemes for domestic/Canada flights have been made inconsistent going back well before the merger.

Besides, on my list of things I care about when flying or choosing an airline, flight numbering scheme ranks pretty close to, if not right at, the bottom, and I'm sure for many, ranks below the bottom.
emcampbe is online now  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 8:55 pm
  #70  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 62,533
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
Make it 8xx is what I am saying. Or align sUA 8xx to a new scheme. There used to be some consistency of 9xx Europe and 8xx Asia/Pacufic. Now it is all over the place.
But since it will be sCO 777 operating the NRT - SIN flight, The flight # would have to fall under the sCO half of the flight number system.
That is my point - who cares the sCOUA - it is UA. They merged Mileage Plus to one scheme. Why not this?

Also, NH operates flight 6 out of NRT-USA, more confusion that can be easily avoided.
uastarflyer is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 5:52 am
  #71  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,378
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
That is my point - who cares the sCOUA - it is UA. They merged Mileage Plus to one scheme. Why not this?
Because UA is still two airlines flying under one brand.
halls120 is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 7:34 am
  #72  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,488
Originally Posted by flyingmusicianlax
Although, as you noted in the other routing changes thread, this too shall be changing with the introduction of a sUA 763 operating IAD - MUC as UA 1.
Wrong. UA 1 will be an SCO 764. Any flight # falling in the 1-199 & 1000-1799 range will operated by sCO. 763 is only on the sUA side and will be under the 200-999 flight # range.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 10:26 am
  #73  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 62,533
Originally Posted by halls120
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
That is my point - who cares the sCOUA - it is UA. They merged Mileage Plus to one scheme. Why not this?
Because UA is still two airlines flying under one brand.
If only sUA operated as PMUA.
uastarflyer is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2013 | 10:20 am
  #74  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Programs: UA 1K, 2.3 MM
Posts: 439
Equipment / Route question: NRT - SIN

I was reviewing this routing for an upcoming trip. It has been since Sept. since I flew IAH - NRT - SIN, but it seems the flight number is now UA7 straight through. Are they using the pmCO 777-200 in BF configuration from NRT - SIN now? Itinerary says plane change, but it shows the BF configuration instead of the UA Business configuration to SIN. Is that the case now?
ErgoTraveler is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2013 | 10:22 am
  #75  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,815
Originally Posted by ErgoTraveler
I was reviewing this routing for an upcoming trip. It has been since Sept. since I flew IAH - NRT - SIN, but it seems the flight number is now UA7 straight through. Are they using the pmCO 777-200 in BF configuration from NRT - SIN now? Itinerary says plane change, but it shows the BF configuration instead of the UA Business configuration to SIN. Is that the case now?
I just flew this route and it is the PMCO 772s from IAH-NRT and NRT-SIN.
edcho is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.