Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

What makes us think we are UA's "best" customers?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What makes us think we are UA's "best" customers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:09 pm
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,909
My theory is they are catering so much to the "kettles" is because a huge portion of their profit is coming from all the ancillary fees the "kettles" pay that elites are exempt from. If you are not a profitable customer you are not one of their "best" customers no matter what your elite level. Being elite costs the airline profit. You don't pay the ancillary fees which are a huge parts of their profits.
Baze is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:10 pm
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA Plat 2MM. DL Plat, AS MVP
Posts: 12,752
Op here,

Very interesting responses. My personal feeling....

While I am annoyed at UA's recent decisions, I don't feel tha UA owes me anything. And I don't think that UA has a responsibility to FT. We are not a governing board. We don't pay membership dues. And I think that UA must look at FT as that group of people who are always complaining and wanting something for nothing.

The most profitable customers are probably the ones who don't have enough time for FT.

The most loyal customers are probably the ones who don't try to take advantage of a mistake.

Where do we fit?
zrs70 is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:15 pm
  #33  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: US CP ; LH FTL ; *G
Posts: 1,630
Originally Posted by zrs70
. . .
The most loyal customers are probably the ones who don't try to take advantage of a mistake.

Where do we fit?
Not to put salt on the wound, but do you know what happens to you if you make a mistake? Does UA treat you like you think we should treat UA and says - hey, you've made a mistake, we understand, let's refund you that non-refundable fare, or change your itin without a change fee. Last time I checked, the response is always - sorry, tough luck, gotta live with the choices you've made, mistake or not.
burlax is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:19 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wherever
Programs: UA 1MM for a while now, AS for a minute, BAEC newly minted Gold
Posts: 1,172
Where do we fit?

deleted

Last edited by cyborg; Jun 2, 2018 at 5:23 am Reason: Moving on from Flyertalk
cyborg is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:24 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern California
Programs: I want to be free! Free!
Posts: 3,455
United thinks Kettles are its best customers.

10 kettles on K fares with fees are much more valuable than one elite buying 10 k fares without them, and who earns more miles (and knows how to use them), is less likely to pay for an upgrade, and knows how to maximize benefits out of the system more generally.

Kettles domestically, full fare internationally. That's the name of the game. And if you happen to be a domestic elite and you buy full Y, then you actually get treated quite well on the upgrade front.

Otherwise, you're at the IAH UA Club whining about it
aCavalierInCoach is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:24 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA Plat 2MM. DL Plat, AS MVP
Posts: 12,752
Originally Posted by burlax
Not to put salt on the wound, but do you know what happens to you if you make a mistake? Does UA treat you like you think we should treat UA and says - hey, you've made a mistake, we understand, let's refund you that non-refundable fare, or change your itin without a change fee. Last time I checked, the response is always - sorry, tough luck, gotta live with the choices you've made, mistake or not.
UA has been very understanding when I make a rather obvious mistake. And there have been times when they told me their hands were tied.

I guess if I had a best loyal customer who acted like many are here, I would rethink the entire program to weed out the spoilers.
zrs70 is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:29 pm
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LT Gold, DL SM, HY Disc, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 12,507
One has to consider the basics of travel behavior to even come close to understanding "best." The first filter for best passenger has to be a passenger whose trips are generated without any regard for the characteristics of the airline. If I'm thinking about taking a trip but only if there is excess capacity requiring a discounted price threshold, that's not best. For me, for example, I always have a list of North American cities I want to visit for a long weekend IF the price is below a threshold of $/MQM and the equipment is not a 50-seater or smaller. That's not "best." The filter for best is "I have to go to Nashville 4 times a year regardless of price, and it's too far to drive."

The second filter for best has very little to do with you, and everything to do with those around you. Your trip needs have to match up with enough other people for the airline to care about it. This is why most airlines feature hubs, even airlines like Southwest which still do a lot of point-to-point service. If you are the only person who wants to fly from Milwaukee to Greenville, you're not the best customer. This is why AA flew RDU-LGW for years and years... because six days a week there were people who needed to fly that route and for whom the 777 was just a big shuttle bus.

If you're thinking about money, plane type, the 500-mile MQM minimum, you're not their best customer. If you're usually changing planes, you're not their best customer. That doesn't mean that you're not useful. I'm very useful to Delta because they'd rather not keep their plane at ORD all day waiting for the people from DTW doing business to be done, so I'm happy to leave at 9:30am and sit on the plane while it goes back to Detroit... as long as it's not a CR2/ER4. But I'm certainly not best.

To me, an airline's best customers are a professional sports team, or a NCAA D1 football team. As player salaries went up, it's not like 30 years ago where I saw the LA Lakers pickup up their luggage from carousel 12 at ORD T1. To need an entire plane, to know when you're going to need it usually 6 months in advance, that's "best." Look at Delta's charter-specific 319s for an example.
ElmhurstNick is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:31 pm
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,307
People need to stop assuming that just because YOU took away your business from UA, someone else hasn't filled in that void. If UA can replace the tickets you are no longer purchasing with a customer, or customers who are, then you are not as valuable as you think you are. In fact, you do not have much value to them at all in reality. Once people begin to accept this, then the "entitled elite" mentality will start to fade. Hopefully.
Fanjet is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:40 pm
  #39  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: US CP ; LH FTL ; *G
Posts: 1,630
Originally Posted by ElmhurstNick
One has to consider the basics of travel behavior to even come close to understanding "best." The first filter for best passenger has to be a passenger whose trips are generated without any regard for the characteristics of the airline. If I'm thinking about taking a trip but only if there is excess capacity requiring a discounted price threshold, that's not best. For me, for example, I always have a list of North American cities I want to visit for a long weekend IF the price is below a threshold of $/MQM and the equipment is not a 50-seater or smaller. That's not "best." The filter for best is "I have to go to Nashville 4 times a year regardless of price, and it's too far to drive."

The second filter for best has very little to do with you, and everything to do with those around you. Your trip needs have to match up with enough other people for the airline to care about it. This is why most airlines feature hubs, even airlines like Southwest which still do a lot of point-to-point service. If you are the only person who wants to fly from Milwaukee to Greenville, you're not the best customer. This is why AA flew RDU-LGW for years and years... because six days a week there were people who needed to fly that route and for whom the 777 was just a big shuttle bus.

If you're thinking about money, plane type, the 500-mile MQM minimum, you're not their best customer. If you're usually changing planes, you're not their best customer. That doesn't mean that you're not useful. I'm very useful to Delta because they'd rather not keep their plane at ORD all day waiting for the people from DTW doing business to be done, so I'm happy to leave at 9:30am and sit on the plane while it goes back to Detroit... as long as it's not a CR2/ER4. But I'm certainly not best.

To me, an airline's best customers are a professional sports team, or a NCAA D1 football team. As player salaries went up, it's not like 30 years ago where I saw the LA Lakers pickup up their luggage from carousel 12 at ORD T1. To need an entire plane, to know when you're going to need it usually 6 months in advance, that's "best." Look at Delta's charter-specific 319s for an example.
Yeah, using that logic, the best is someone who buys restricted F and no-shows without cancelling. Or better yet, someone who wills his entire estate to SMI/J and commits suicide.
burlax is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:40 pm
  #40  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LT Gold, DL SM, HY Disc, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 12,507
Originally Posted by Baze
My theory is they are catering so much to the "kettles" is because a huge portion of their profit is coming from all the ancillary fees the "kettles" pay that elites are exempt from. If you are not a profitable customer you are not one of their "best" customers no matter what your elite level. Being elite costs the airline profit. You don't pay the ancillary fees which are a huge parts of their profits.
The ancillary fees get the kettles on certain routes "en masse" to become acceptable customers. But they are still not as good as the person flying B fares. They're just better than us when we're flying discretionary travel.

Originally Posted by burlax
Yeah, using that logic, the best is someone who buys restricted F and no-shows without cancelling. Or better yet, someone who wills his entire estate to SMI/J and commits suicide.
No, I think you missed the point. Look at the RDU-LGW example.

The best customer is one who controls lots of passengers' travel behavior and is perfectly willing to treat those passengers like cattle and send them back and forth between particular city pairs to get work done.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Sep 8, 2012 at 6:45 pm Reason: merge
ElmhurstNick is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:47 pm
  #41  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: US CP ; LH FTL ; *G
Posts: 1,630
Originally Posted by ElmhurstNick
No, I think you missed the point. Look at the RDU-LGW example.

The best customer is one who controls lots of passengers' travel behavior and is perfectly willing to treat those passengers like cattle and send them back and forth between particular city pairs to get work done.
No, I think YOU missed the point. It's unreasonable to expect that customers will be buying UA without any regard for competition, be they Joe Schmoe, or a random FT poster, or Koby Bryant. And this is not something around what UA can or should build its business model. Quite honestly, if you have lots of money, why would you even fly UA? You will have your own private jet, or fly charters if you're poor.
burlax is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:48 pm
  #42  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by burlax
UA needs Joe Schmoes buying cheap fares just as it needs GS buying expensive fares,
Yes, but they also don't have to reward those cheap customers the same way. The assumption around here often seems to be that they do.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 4:51 pm
  #43  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: US CP ; LH FTL ; *G
Posts: 1,630
Originally Posted by sbm12
Yes, but they also don't have to reward those cheap customers the same way. The assumption around here often seems to be that they do.
Actually, it should - because the published benefits are not based on spend or fare class, but rather on the mileage flown. If UA concluded that spend is more important, UA should make changes to MP and make it based on spend.
burlax is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 5:01 pm
  #44  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LT Gold, DL SM, HY Disc, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 12,507
Originally Posted by burlax
No, I think YOU missed the point. It's unreasonable to expect that customers will be buying UA without any regard for competition, be they Joe Schmoe, or a random FT poster, or Koby Bryant. And this is not something around what UA can or should build its business model. Quite honestly, if you have lots of money, why would you even fly UA? You will have your own private jet, or fly charters if you're poor.
You actually have expectations for your money.

The poor corporate sheepie whose travel manager tells them that they have to fly UA has the expectation of wanting to keep his/her job, so said sheepie dutifully flies UA even if it means having to spend 8-10 hours a week on a CR2.

How in any particular world can you actually be a better customer?
ElmhurstNick is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2012, 5:15 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
The UA vs Kayaker getting cheap fare argument is specious

Originally Posted by exerda
??

I can spend, say, $300 to book on DL. Instead, I spend $500 to book on UA.

You can bet your sweet bippie that the Kettles aren't making the choice to UA in that situation. They'll book UA when it's $250.

Tell me again how my repeat business is not good for UA?

The level of apologetics for UA is amazing.
At first I thought yes, exactly!

Then I thought it through a bit more.

That $500 United seat has some chance of an upgrade coming with it. What have your upgrade rates been this year? And what honest value would you give a seat in F?

Let's say you are a high-flyin' 1K who gets upgrades 50% of the time. And we'll give a value for domestic F transcon at $1000.

10 transcons on UA at $500 each = $5000
Less value of upgrades 50% of the time ($1000-500)*5 = -$2500
Net value $2500

The math is sloppy and numbers open to question, but you get the idea. There is added value to being an elite, so to pretend that there's no benefit paying a higher fare to fly UA vs a Kettle flying as a nobody on a cheaper fare is specious.
Mike Jacoubowsky is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.