![]() |
I hope I as a US citizen can benefit from the local lockdowns come June 10th.
I'll be armed with: 1. Entry negative test 2. Day 2 negative test 3. Last and but not least I'll be vaccinated (getting my jab Monday). |
Originally Posted by enviroian
(Post 33081551)
I hope I as a US citizen can benefit from the local lockdowns come June 10th.
I'll be armed with: 1. Entry negative test 2. Day 2 negative test 3. Last and but not least I'll be vaccinated (getting my jab Monday). |
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 33081563)
What local lockdown June 10?
|
158 deaths reported today vs the 290 last Saturday. That's a 45% drop, which is massive and it's been at a very high rate for the last week or so, with the last 7 days lower than last week by 34%, which is great to see.
Schools go back next week, so we probably will see a plateau in cases, but hopefully deaths continue to tumble down. I think the important thing with cases from next week would be to pay more attention to the positivity rate, which currently stands at approximately 0.6%. By late April, assuming the UK hits its vaccination target, deaths really should have been almost completely stopped. |
Originally Posted by enviroian
(Post 33081606)
sorry I wasn't clear. I'm referring to June 10th as that's when I'll be visiting. I'm hoping the 10 day quarantine for visitors will be lifted.
|
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33081723)
158 deaths reported today vs the 290 last Saturday. That's a 45% drop, which is massive and it's been at a very high rate for the last week or so, with the last 7 days lower than last week by 34%, which is great to see.
Schools go back next week, so we probably will see a plateau in cases, but hopefully deaths continue to tumble down. I think the important thing with cases from next week would be to pay more attention to the positivity rate, which currently stands at approximately 0.6%. By late April, assuming the UK hits its vaccination target, deaths really should have been almost completely stopped. |
To not lose the progress, I am worried that Scotland will continue to make it illegal to not only go abroad but even the rest of the UK throughout all of summer, with a hotel quarantine for all destinations. :(
|
Originally Posted by Dan1113
(Post 33081986)
To not lose the progress, I am worried that Scotland will continue to make it illegal to not only go abroad but even the rest of the UK throughout all of summer, with a hotel quarantine for all destinations. :(
:) |
Originally Posted by Dan1113
(Post 33081986)
To not lose the progress, I am worried that Scotland will continue to make it illegal to not only go abroad but even the rest of the UK throughout all of summer, with a hotel quarantine for all destinations. :(
|
Originally Posted by Dan1113
(Post 33081986)
To not lose the progress, I am worried that Scotland will continue to make it illegal to not only go abroad but even the rest of the UK throughout all of summer, with a hotel quarantine for all destinations. :(
|
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33081723)
158 deaths reported today vs the 290 last Saturday. That's a 45% drop, which is massive and it's been at a very high rate for the last week or so, with the last 7 days lower than last week by 34%, which is great to see.
|
Originally Posted by Misco60
(Post 33082107)
The Scottish government will do what it believes is best for Scotland. And it seems to work: the covid death rate in Scotland is a third less than that in England, effectively saving 3,000 lives, which I think is a fair trade-off for not being able to go on holiday.
|
Originally Posted by cauchy
(Post 33082429)
There's a minor problem with this analysis. Scotland has 171 deaths per 100k (death certificate, not the 28 day figure). Sweden has 127 per 100k. That's equivalent to an extra 2500 deaths in Scotland. Has Scotland's lockdown done more harm than good?
|
Originally Posted by cauchy
(Post 33082429)
There's a minor problem with this analysis. Scotland has 171 deaths per 100k (death certificate, not the 28 day figure). Sweden has 127 per 100k. That's equivalent to an extra 2500 deaths in Scotland. Has Scotland's lockdown done more harm than good?
None of the UK nations has performed well during the pandemic, and bringing Sweden into it doesn't change the fact that on almost every measure Scotland has done better than England. |
Originally Posted by cauchy
(Post 33082429)
There's a minor problem with this analysis. Scotland has 171 deaths per 100k (death certificate, not the 28 day figure). Sweden has 127 per 100k. That's equivalent to an extra 2500 deaths in Scotland. Has Scotland's lockdown done more harm than good?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:32 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.