Local lockdowns in the UK
#1486
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Exec Club, SIA KrisFlyer, Qantas FF, Emirates Skywards
Posts: 1,850
This is what im hoping for. I have travel booked for the end of April and as long as it is not "illegal" we have every intention of getting on that flight, paying for our four tests, the extra insurance for travelling against advice, and quaranting on return. We will jump through hoops. The only game changer would be if we each had to pay the £1750 for a hotel quarantine on return, but other than that we are willing to travel despite restrictions.
#1487
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: London
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 86
Our flights are on a saturday and so far the flights have been running on saturdays this whole lockdown to my destination, so it's unlikely they will be cancelled, is a rebooking from April last year for our wedding, just want it done now!
#1488
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Exec Club, SIA KrisFlyer, Qantas FF, Emirates Skywards
Posts: 1,850
So moving back from the hotly charged debate - any sense as to know when we will get a sense as to what the legal/SI basis behind travel restrictions will be from March 29? As that will really go to the question as to whether there will be a step back from an enforceable ban on overseas travel given that I understand that they have to re-write it regardless once the stay-at-home order is lifted?
#1489
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: London
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 86
The main difference is its will now be legal to sit down on a park bench/sunbathe. Least my neighbour can stop calling the police for me sunbathing in my communal garden on my own now...
#1490
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,804
There are separate set of SIs which cover incoming passengers to the UK, mandating self isolation, managed isolation, pre travel testing, post travel testing, test to release. I guess there is no need to change these, and anyone booking travel should - for the time being - factor in the risk of £1750 cost of managed isolation, along with the £205 testing cost - since we still don't know enough about what the future looks like.
#1491
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,964
I agree, the PM won't be setting out laws today which take effect in over a months time. However, if I were a legal draftsman and wanted to copy and paste it should be noted as well as the stay at home rule Scotland already has specific legal restrictions on leaving and entering Scotland without a reasonable excuse - so it is easily done. Also the reported restriction not to stay away from home overnight will be in play - we had this last year in the law in June.
#1492
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 963
The overseas travel restrictions were largely hinged on the stay at home statutory instruments. You needed a reasonable excuse to be out of your home, and going to the Madlives is not reasonable. So this aspect of the legislation will change, and I'm sure that the SI will be amended yet again. As a digression, some of the SIs in this space are borderline impossible to understand since the amendments have piled up on each other so much, and I doubt anyone can possibly operate them due to all the changes from the baseline SI. I hope there is a tidying up process at some point. But for 29 March I suspect there will be either an amended SI redefining the stay at home requirements or a new SI. That will probably emerge only shortly before the relevant dates, following recent precedent, and there will be a parliamentary debate on them too.
There are separate set of SIs which cover incoming passengers to the UK, mandating self isolation, managed isolation, pre travel testing, post travel testing, test to release. I guess there is no need to change these, and anyone booking travel should - for the time being - factor in the risk of £1750 cost of managed isolation, along with the £205 testing cost - since we still don't know enough about what the future looks like.
There are separate set of SIs which cover incoming passengers to the UK, mandating self isolation, managed isolation, pre travel testing, post travel testing, test to release. I guess there is no need to change these, and anyone booking travel should - for the time being - factor in the risk of £1750 cost of managed isolation, along with the £205 testing cost - since we still don't know enough about what the future looks like.
#1493
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,964
This is very unlikely based on what is reported. As noted, it is expected the stay at home will be lifted, but you will not be allowed to be away from home overnight. This is exactly what happened last year as lockdown was gradually lifted.
#1494
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: London
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 86
This is what im hoping for. I find the newspaper headlines of "no holidays till august" seem to be more focused on the family package holidays with Tui to Spain with the kids, without quarantine and multiple tests. Where as savvy flexible travelers who are happy to jump through the hoops, afford all the tests and are able to quarantine at home seems to not be the focus of the narative when it comes to "holidays" in the press.
#1495
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 963
I don't disagree about the rule about no nights away from home. But practically, if someone left the country last June no one would have said boo on departure or at BF on return as I recall. Happy to be corrected.
#1496
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: London
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 86
However when we were in the tier system in the autumn/winter, wasn't it the rule that you couldn't stay away from home overnight in the UK, but could still go abroad and stay overnight?
#1497
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 963
Under Tier 3, yes. Tier 4 then banned international travel but it was unenforced.
#1498
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,345
The overseas travel restrictions were largely hinged on the stay at home statutory instruments. You needed a reasonable excuse to be out of your home, and going to the Madlives is not reasonable. So this aspect of the legislation will change, and I'm sure that the SI will be amended yet again. As a digression, some of the SIs in this space are borderline impossible to understand since the amendments have piled up on each other so much, and I doubt anyone can possibly operate them due to all the changes from the baseline SI. I hope there is a tidying up process at some point. But for 29 March I suspect there will be either an amended SI redefining the stay at home requirements or a new SI. That will probably emerge only shortly before the relevant dates, following recent precedent, and there will be a parliamentary debate on them too.
There are separate set of SIs which cover incoming passengers to the UK, mandating self isolation, managed isolation, pre travel testing, post travel testing, test to release. I guess there is no need to change these, and anyone booking travel should - for the time being - factor in the risk of £1750 cost of managed isolation, along with the £205 testing cost - since we still don't know enough about what the future looks like.
There are separate set of SIs which cover incoming passengers to the UK, mandating self isolation, managed isolation, pre travel testing, post travel testing, test to release. I guess there is no need to change these, and anyone booking travel should - for the time being - factor in the risk of £1750 cost of managed isolation, along with the £205 testing cost - since we still don't know enough about what the future looks like.
#1499
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,964
Hotels in tier 4 [EDIT: and tier 3] areas were only allowed to accommodate guests for a restricted number of reasons like work travel.
See above.
Last edited by KARFA; Feb 22, 2021 at 5:17 am Reason: sorry, added tier 3
#1500
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 963
No it wasn't. Tiers 1-3 had no restrictions on movement or staying away from home. Tier 4 had a stay at home restriction as we now have. If you were living in a tier 4 area you were not allowed to leave home for leisure travel, whether within the UK or abroad.
Hotels in tier 4 areas were only allowed to accommodate guests for a restricted number of reasons like work travel.
See above.
Hotels in tier 4 areas were only allowed to accommodate guests for a restricted number of reasons like work travel.
See above.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ions-explained
https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information...ockdown-tiers/
This would seem to be consistent with recollection that Tier 3 prohibited overnight stays for non-essential reasons while not imposing a travel ban. Indeed, when we tried to book NYE in Cornwall ~December 12 we were told they were refusing London bookings until they knew whether London would move into Tier 3 that week (which it did, before moving into tier 4 the following weekend) as they wouldn't be allowed to accept Tier 3 resident guests.