Rude Behavior--applying fingernail polish in first class
#32
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: BOS, MHT
Programs: USAirways - CP, American Airlines - Gold, Marriott - Gold, Hilton - Gold
Posts: 125
What's the big deal with applying nail polish? Nail polish remover is another issue entirely, but I don't notice anything particularly noxious about the polish itself. I's rather someone do it in her seat than occupy the lavatory for 10 minutes. My only concern would be the possibility of her spilling it on me.
The good news...we were expedited into Boston 15 minutes ahead of schedule. I had almost fully recovered.
The bad news...everyone had to wait for EMS arrive, assess my condition, and get me off the plane. I got a nice side trip to Mass General and got to pay close to $500 in emergency room fees out of pocket after copays.
Just because something doesn't bother you, doesn't mean it isn't incredibly distressing to someone else.
#34




Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: AC.SE
Posts: 2,584
Already in this thread we've identified nail polish (+/- remover), perfume, cologne, and lotion as substances which irritate people. I know people who don't like the smell of tanned leather, new furniture, glue, and paint. Personally, I don't like smelly feet, body odor, etc., and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in that respect.
Common sense would dictate that you not overdo the perfume or cologne. Yet common sense should also motivate people to take a shower, not to wear footwear which allows odor to escape into the cabin, not to break wind, etc. Why, in circumstances where organic wrongs are committed, is there no glaring, no pointed comments, or the like? Or is there?
I'm being a bit facetious in some of my comments, but I do have difficulty determining how to be everything to every one of my fellow passengers.
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: IAH
Programs: La Ministreuse de Surréalisme, CO Plat, MR Plat, SPG Plat
Posts: 11,358
While this is true, and clearly most of us don't wish to cause anyone distress, I'm almost certain that nearly everyone can find some substance or odor irritating or distressing. And I would argue (though I don't know for certain) that those who are severely (ie, physiologically) distressed by common substances or odors are in the minority.
Already in this thread we've identified nail polish (+/- remover), perfume, cologne, and lotion as substances which irritate people. I know people who don't like the smell of tanned leather, new furniture, glue, and paint. Personally, I don't like smelly feet, body odor, etc., and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in that respect.
Common sense would dictate that you not overdo the perfume or cologne. Yet common sense should also motivate people to take a shower, not to wear footwear which allows odor to escape into the cabin, not to break wind, etc. Why, in circumstances where organic wrongs are committed, is there no glaring, no pointed comments, or the like? Or is there?
I'm being a bit facetious in some of my comments, but I do have difficulty determining how to be everything to every one of my fellow passengers.
Already in this thread we've identified nail polish (+/- remover), perfume, cologne, and lotion as substances which irritate people. I know people who don't like the smell of tanned leather, new furniture, glue, and paint. Personally, I don't like smelly feet, body odor, etc., and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in that respect.
Common sense would dictate that you not overdo the perfume or cologne. Yet common sense should also motivate people to take a shower, not to wear footwear which allows odor to escape into the cabin, not to break wind, etc. Why, in circumstances where organic wrongs are committed, is there no glaring, no pointed comments, or the like? Or is there?
I'm being a bit facetious in some of my comments, but I do have difficulty determining how to be everything to every one of my fellow passengers.
There is a difference between behaviour which is annoying, gross, disgusting or disturbing and that which creates a medical problem or crisis (as indicated above in ALM5150's post). I have severe allergies including a life threatening one. I carry 2 double epi pens and don't live in a bubble. I take my chances and hope that one of these days they'll come up with something that will prevent/cure my allergies. I'm not going to stop flying/stay in hotels/go to restaurants/public, etc. but would appreciate people not doing things like apply perfume in public. I am sure that the people doing this have no idea that they are harming someone else. I don't think anyone does this maliciously. Hopefully, this thread will open some eyes.
#36
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Please remove "chat" from your list of acceptable activities. It is a real problem for me on US domestic flights when pax seem to delight in talking at the top of their voices to one another about the most uninteresting, inane topics. Unfortunately Noise Cancelling headphones don't drown out loud talkers and hte clanging sound emanating from them at higher volumes are unpleasanet for others too. Please people, fart away but for Pete's sake keep your bloody traps shut.
#37
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: BOS, MHT
Programs: USAirways - CP, American Airlines - Gold, Marriott - Gold, Hilton - Gold
Posts: 125

Common sense would dictate that you not overdo the perfume or cologne. Yet common sense should also motivate people to take a shower, not to wear footwear which allows odor to escape into the cabin, not to break wind, etc. Why, in circumstances where organic wrongs are committed, is there no glaring, no pointed comments, or the like? Or is there?
I get your point about trying to be everything to everyone, but common sense seems to be a lost skill for some people. Picking up on fellow passengers non-verbal cues should be very telling, but is also a lost skill...perhaps a deliberate loss at that.
It never ceases to amaze me. You can jam 100 people into a metal tube. 95 of them don't disrupt anything, don't smell like anything, and keep their bathroom behavior in the lav. 5 well placed offenders can ruin the flight for the rest. That tells me that in general, people know what "the rules" are.
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott, IHG, Hyatt something
Posts: 34,519
I had a lady on a LAN flight a couple of months ago putting it on, and I just stared at her, unbelieving that someone could be so rude. She never caught on, and finished up, so I just tried to hold my breath for awhile, until the fumes cleared up.
#41
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: UA, NW
Posts: 160
For an asthmatic, there is no "opinion" about it. Anaphylactic shock is deadly and can be caused by many things. My asthma hasn't progressed that far yet, but my asthma attacks are equally distressing to me, moreso to the people around me, since they cause me to vomit!
Now that I think about it, that might be a good way to inhibit rude behaviors... Hmmm.
Now that I think about it, that might be a good way to inhibit rude behaviors... Hmmm.
#42
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 31,464
#43

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
)
#44
Original Member




Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,127
#45
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA, USA
Programs: skymiles,
Posts: 304
While I don't like anyone else applying nail polish, I must confess that I like the smell of nail polish. And Sharpies, white-out etc! Still - not ok for the plane.
Now perfume is another story. I remember when passengers would receive their duty free mid air and the spraying would start! I also hate inserts into magazines - especially when you seat mate is hell bent on opening every single one!
Now perfume is another story. I remember when passengers would receive their duty free mid air and the spraying would start! I also hate inserts into magazines - especially when you seat mate is hell bent on opening every single one!



