Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

What is the longest flight on a narrow body plane?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What is the longest flight on a narrow body plane?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2012, 10:03 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BGM/ PHL
Programs: US (Silver, *A Silver), AA, Starbucks (Gold)
Posts: 2,242
Originally Posted by hfly
Every single long haul flight transatlantic through 1971 or so was on single aisle jet planes.
"Flew in from Miami Beach B.O.A.C. Didn't get to bed last night"
thomwithanh is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2012, 11:02 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 610
Originally Posted by rkkwan
Sure. About 10.5hr in the summer, 12hr in the winter, for the westbound AMS-IAH KL663.
PrivatAir must be a specialist in this, they fly FRA-PNQ for LH which is a 8-hr+ flight.
678flyer is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2012, 5:59 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: AMS
Posts: 2,064
EC (OpenSkies) flies 752s between Paris and the US, though these are in a 2-2 config so it's actually quite nice.

I like 757s from the outside though, very pretty planes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tr...edelstaedt.jpg http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace...ng-757-200.jpg

Last edited by CyBeR; Jan 29, 2012 at 7:04 am
CyBeR is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2012, 4:44 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,485
Not quite up to the PrivatAir flight lengths, but NH does NRT-BOM in a 737. 11h to BOM, 8h back. I thought these were business class, but there are some coach tickets for sale on these flights.
ralfp is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2012, 11:07 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LAS
Programs: DL PM, UA PS, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 4,904
PrivatAir dba Lufthansa does FRA-PNQ on a 738, which is 8h15m non-stop going and 10h25m on the return + 30 minutes ground time at OTP for re-fuel.

It used to be all J, now has J + Y. My family loves this flight, as we have relatives in PNQ and prefer not to have to drive from BOM. Only AI from DXB and LH from FRA serve the airport internationally.

Edit: whoops, my ctrl+f failed me, already posted.
amolkold is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 12:10 am
  #36  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,797
Originally Posted by amolkold
PrivatAir dba Lufthansa does FRA-PNQ on a 738, which is 8h15m non-stop going and 10h25m on the return + 30 minutes ground time at OTP for re-fuel.

It used to be all J, now has J + Y. My family loves this flight, as we have relatives in PNQ and prefer not to have to drive from BOM. Only AI from DXB and LH from FRA serve the airport internationally.

Edit: whoops, my ctrl+f failed me, already posted.
I still remember the days of a 747 from East to West Coast USA. Nowadays it is all narrow bodied planes with 2 engines.

The 787-8 dreamliner has an extremel long range but the 777 + 787 are wider than what you would consider narrowbody jets.

The 757 is likely the longest range of the narrowbodies. The A318 a narrow body also has flown transatlantic from NY to London.

Generally 757s hit Western Europe, but they have been known to have headwind issues at times forcing them to make a stopover, same with the A318.

The Bombardier CSeries is a new narrow body due out which can do the transatlantic routes without refueling due to headwind issues so they will have more range. But NYC to Western Europe is all you will get out of narrow bodies. Obviously in other locations around the globe you would see the same comparative range between 2 other airports.
adamj023 is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 12:27 am
  #37  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Programs: Ham Medallion
Posts: 104
Originally Posted by adamj023
The Bombardier CSeries is a new narrow body due out which can do the transatlantic routes without refueling due to headwind issues so they will have more range. But NYC to Western Europe is all you will get out of narrow bodies. Obviously in other locations around the globe you would see the same comparative range between 2 other airports.
I sure hope they're better designed than the CRJ's....imagine taking one of those trans-Atlantic
flying_owl is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 1:02 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 634
Originally Posted by TheDingler
I am going on a flight this fall that is about eight hours and it will be on a Boeing 757. This very long flight will be on a cramped NARROW BODY PLANE. I can not believe it that they are flying us all the way to Europe on a small narrow bodied plane.
Have done Newark <-> Belfast lots of times on a 757, both in economy and business. It's about 7.5 hours westbound, and 7 hours eastbound. It's no different from any other medium-haul flight. The amount of space you have is normal, and moving up and down the aisle is normal too. You'll be fine.
acunningham is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 1:09 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,452
Originally Posted by adamj023
The 757 is likely the longest range of the narrowbodies.
Likely not.
Between Boeing 707-320, Douglas DC-8-72, Vickers VC-10 and Ilyushin Il-62, which one do you think has the longest range? I expect that some if not all of them have longer range than 757-200.
Originally Posted by adamj023
The A318 a narrow body also has flown transatlantic from NY to London.
So have A319LR.
Originally Posted by adamj023

Generally 757s hit Western Europe, but they have been known to have headwind issues at times forcing them to make a stopover, same with the A318.

The Bombardier CSeries is a new narrow body due out which can do the transatlantic routes without refueling due to headwind issues so they will have more range. But NYC to Western Europe is all you will get out of narrow bodies. Obviously in other locations around the globe you would see the same comparative range between 2 other airports.
I sure hope they're better designed than the CRJ's....imagine taking one of those trans-Atlantic
CRJ has the same cabin cross section as Bombardier Global Express.

How does the Bombardier CSeries cabin width compare against de Havilland Comet cabin?
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 5:29 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: AMS
Posts: 2,064
Originally Posted by adamj023
The A318 a narrow body also has flown transatlantic from NY to London.
It still does, twice daily, as BA1/2/3/4.

It does require a stopover in SNN eastbound though.
CyBeR is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 5:44 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Programs: Eurobonus, Thon Gold
Posts: 100
Probably not counting, but i did KEF-EWR in 2010. But got diverted to JFK. After landing we were denied deboarding.

So total time in plane was:

3 hours delay after boarding in KEF
6 hours flight time
11 hours wait on ground at JFK
Equals 20 hours on a very cramped 757

Not a great start to the holiday...
jALIg is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 10:35 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LAS
Programs: DL PM, UA PS, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 4,904
Originally Posted by CyBeR
It still does, twice daily, as BA1/2/3/4.

It does require a stopover in SNN eastbound though.
Actually, it requires a stopover westbound, due to winds + short takeoff runway at LCY. While there, pax do US pre-arrival customs & immigration at SNN so that the flight can land at a domestic gate at JFK.
amolkold is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 1:01 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LAX
Programs: UA, Bonvoy, Amex Plat
Posts: 1,582
I've done PHL<--->DUB on a US 757. As others have noted, the experience is no more painful than a standard transcon.

The perception of increased discomfort on a narrowbody is largely an optical illusion, as you likely have the same amount of personal space in coach on a 757 as you would on a widebody. The narrower cabin simply creates the perception of less space.
zcat18 is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 2:30 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: AMS
Posts: 2,064
Originally Posted by amolkold
Actually, it requires a stopover westbound, due to winds + short takeoff runway at LCY. While there, pax do US pre-arrival customs & immigration at SNN so that the flight can land at a domestic gate at JFK.
You are right. I knew that but wrote it down wrong.


Originally Posted by zcat18
I've done PHL<--->DUB on a US 757. As others have noted, the experience is no more painful than a standard transcon.

The perception of increased discomfort on a narrowbody is largely an optical illusion, as you likely have the same amount of personal space in coach on a 757 as you would on a widebody. The narrower cabin simply creates the perception of less space.
There is one thing that's different though. I try to pick planes that have 2-X-2 layouts (where I don't care about X). 757s will come as 3-3 in Y.
CyBeR is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.