A340 lower deck
Apr 27, 2001 | 7:36 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 673
A340 lower deck
I read from somewhere that some space on the lower deck of the A340 can be used by passengers. Airbus is encouraging airlines to install lavatories on the lower deck to save space. Why don't they just put more seats on the lower deck then? Can other aircrafts(eg 747, 777, 767, etc) do such things? Thanks.
Apr 27, 2001 | 8:09 pm
#4
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Third planet from the Sun
Posts: 7,024
The 1011 tirstar has a galley on the lower deck--with an elevator to shuttle the carts and FA's up and down. They also offered a high capacity model that could seat over 500 passengers--complete with fold out stair from the lower deck. No Airline ordered any.
Boeing and Lockhead also offered a lower lounge in the forward cargo hold on the 747/1011's, complete with observation window pointing straight down. Air cargo make too much profit for the airlines to give this serious consideration.
The flights between Chile and the US can run empty and still make a profit from the cargo in the hold.
Boeing and Lockhead also offered a lower lounge in the forward cargo hold on the 747/1011's, complete with observation window pointing straight down. Air cargo make too much profit for the airlines to give this serious consideration.
The flights between Chile and the US can run empty and still make a profit from the cargo in the hold.
Apr 27, 2001 | 11:47 pm
#5
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Knysna, South Africa AA Plat BR Silver
Posts: 57
The late PSA Airline, primarily an intra California carrier, ordered (I believe) 2 L-1011-50s that were configured with the downstairs lounge. By the time they took delivery, PSA realized that frequency was more important than equipment on the SFO-LAX trunk route.
As for cargo, airlines like LH and BR seem to love the operational advantages of the the 747-400 combi, where cargo is stacked below and behind the main passenger cabin.
But I agree, more lavs - bigger lavs - would be a plus anywhere on the airplane!
As for cargo, airlines like LH and BR seem to love the operational advantages of the the 747-400 combi, where cargo is stacked below and behind the main passenger cabin.
But I agree, more lavs - bigger lavs - would be a plus anywhere on the airplane!
Apr 28, 2001 | 4:12 pm
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 673
I saw a UA DC-10 (ORD-HNL) has a lift to move things to and from the lower deck. From the Airbus website, (click A330/340 and innovation), they say a lot about the use of the lower deck in their aircrafts. That made me wonder why other aircrafts of about the same size didn't mention this thing at all.
Apr 28, 2001 | 4:16 pm
#9
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K MM, Accor Plat, Htz PC, Natl ExEm, other random status
Posts: 2,879
I believe that, in order for the a/c to be certified to carry pax in seats on a lower deck that can be occupied for t/o and landing, the framing of the aircraft would have to be reinforced so that it could withstand a belly landing without crushing the pax sitting on the lower deck.
The question for the airline winds up being whether the additional cost and weight of the reinforcements (plus the loss of potentially lucrative cargo space) are made up for by the increased pax that are carried.
I think LH has converted all of its 747 combis back to all pax configurations.
Greg
[This message has been edited by greg99 (edited 04-28-2001).]
The question for the airline winds up being whether the additional cost and weight of the reinforcements (plus the loss of potentially lucrative cargo space) are made up for by the increased pax that are carried.
As for cargo, airlines like LH and BR seem to love the operational advantages of the the 747-400 combi, where cargo is stacked below and behind the main passenger cabin.
Greg
[This message has been edited by greg99 (edited 04-28-2001).]
Lower Deck
Apr 4, 2010 | 3:02 pm
#12
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MUC
Posts: 162
Yes Lufthansa's A346 has some lavatories down there. I like these, because they are more spacious than the "normal" ones.
Additionally, there are the Crew Rests down there and there is also an elevator to bring up the catering.
Additionally, there are the Crew Rests down there and there is also an elevator to bring up the catering.
Apr 4, 2010 | 6:18 pm
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
Every window compromises with the integrity of the structure. Puting in more windows would require strengthening the fuselage.
Apr 5, 2010 | 3:21 pm
#14
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Programs: United MileagePlus Silver, Nexus, Global Entry
Posts: 8,810
Apr 5, 2010 | 3:22 pm
#15
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yyz
Programs: Non-Rev Lifetime
Posts: 1,925
AC used lower deck crew modules on the A340. Loaded through cargo door.
My memory is a bit fuzzy but there is a hatch (to the main deck) that disables the drive system, in the cargo bay, if it's left unlocked.
My memory is a bit fuzzy but there is a hatch (to the main deck) that disables the drive system, in the cargo bay, if it's left unlocked.