Is Premium Economy an awkward middle ground?
#47
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
I agree with the OP (and on the metaphor too, I can't imagine why anyone would buy an Audi A3 for example). I think PY also sets people up for disappointment because the airline markets it like it's PREMIUM economy when it's still premium ECONOMY.
#48
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,807
The same question was probably asked decades ago when airlines introduced Business Class
Comfort wise, today's PE is what Business Class used to be like 25 years ago. And today's Business Class is what First Class used to be like 25 years ago.
The comfort in premium classes is constantly improving, while the comfort in Y is constantly deteriorating. PE simply fills this ever-growing gap.
Comfort wise, today's PE is what Business Class used to be like 25 years ago. And today's Business Class is what First Class used to be like 25 years ago.
The comfort in premium classes is constantly improving, while the comfort in Y is constantly deteriorating. PE simply fills this ever-growing gap.
#49
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
Probably not - that would feel a little awkward and probably impact our full enjoyment of J. They're good kids and they've been to Europe a few times, but leaving them on their own for their first TPAC at 2x the length of a TATL isn't something we'd do. And I wouldn't want to be one of those people who is constantly scurrying between cabins or having the kids bug FAs to come into J. Nobody likes that.
If we run into some weird availability issues, I'd maybe do 1 J and 3 PE, wife in J, and everybody stays in their own cabins during the flight.
If we run into some weird availability issues, I'd maybe do 1 J and 3 PE, wife in J, and everybody stays in their own cabins during the flight.
#50
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hilton, Hyatt House, Del Taco
Posts: 5,378
Probably not - that would feel a little awkward and probably impact our full enjoyment of J. They're good kids and they've been to Europe a few times, but leaving them on their own for their first TPAC at 2x the length of a TATL isn't something we'd do. And I wouldn't want to be one of those people who is constantly scurrying between cabins or having the kids bug FAs to come into J. Nobody likes that.
For instance, we're going to a place on the opposite end of the earth this fall. My wife really wanted to go.
It's a super-long flight, and I have to work the next day. Plus my back gets sore quick. So I just can't deal with economy seating for that long of a flight.
But PE is 2x the cost of Y. I can't afford this trip if the entire family flies PE. Kids are too young to sit by themselves in Y, so we can't do me and my wife in PE and kids in the back, either. So as bad as this may look, we're going with me in PE (wife and I will look to split some time as long as FA allows) and the rest in Y.
#51
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 26,288
It makes fiscal sense to me. I've flown my last "basic economy" fare, aside from Southwest. Just not worth spending 2-3 + hours in such discomfort.
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 26,288
I'm not paying for capitalization; I'm paying for added seat pitch.
#53
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,573
Yeah it's definitely not ideal. Nonetheless I have to do it occasionally.
For instance, we're going to a place on the opposite end of the earth this fall. My wife really wanted to go.
It's a super-long flight, and I have to work the next day. Plus my back gets sore quick. So I just can't deal with economy seating for that long of a flight.
But PE is 2x the cost of Y. I can't afford this trip if the entire family flies PE. Kids are too young to sit by themselves in Y, so we can't do me and my wife in PE and kids in the back, either. So as bad as this may look, we're going with me in PE (wife and I will look to split some time as long as FA allows) and the rest in Y.
For instance, we're going to a place on the opposite end of the earth this fall. My wife really wanted to go.
It's a super-long flight, and I have to work the next day. Plus my back gets sore quick. So I just can't deal with economy seating for that long of a flight.
But PE is 2x the cost of Y. I can't afford this trip if the entire family flies PE. Kids are too young to sit by themselves in Y, so we can't do me and my wife in PE and kids in the back, either. So as bad as this may look, we're going with me in PE (wife and I will look to split some time as long as FA allows) and the rest in Y.
#54
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
Indeed. Since the product hasn't standardized completely across the industry, you have to look closely at each airline and aircraft type to figure out what you're getting. The CX product I'm looking at for next year is 40x20, which seems like it's on the better end of PE offerings. Can't tell degrees of recline yet, but I would think there's some (?) correlation between pitch and recline. More room for recline in a 40" config than a 36" one. At least I would hope...
#55
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DTW, but drive to/from YYZ/ORD
Programs: Chase Ultimate Rewards 2MM, Diner Club points
Posts: 31,920
THis is the true comparision OP wants to get at with "entry level luxury being gauche." A company that wants their employees to fly long haul for work but refuses to shell out the money for them to fly J. Sorry but I won't work for companies that force such travel.
#56
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 48
It seems that there is an increase of pax outraged by the deterioration of Economy..they remember the days of better, wider seats, free bags and a meal every flight. What they forget is that the deterioration in service and comfort is matched by a deterioration in price.
Sure, it's cramped and there are fees for what used to be included..but the fact is, you can fly across the country for a few hundred dollars. You can fly in a region for under 200 dollars. Flying is now affordable to the lower classes in a way it never was before. People who used to take Greyhound can now fly. And the reason this is so is because airlines have figured out how to capture marketshare by dropping the frills and lowering the price. The consumer benefits by getting cheap fares.
So if you complain about the loss of amenities, remember how much tix were when those were included. Flying today is easy compared with 20+ years ago when a higher % of your income was required to do it.
You can have it good and expensive, or bad and cheap. You can't have it good and cheap.
Sure, it's cramped and there are fees for what used to be included..but the fact is, you can fly across the country for a few hundred dollars. You can fly in a region for under 200 dollars. Flying is now affordable to the lower classes in a way it never was before. People who used to take Greyhound can now fly. And the reason this is so is because airlines have figured out how to capture marketshare by dropping the frills and lowering the price. The consumer benefits by getting cheap fares.
So if you complain about the loss of amenities, remember how much tix were when those were included. Flying today is easy compared with 20+ years ago when a higher % of your income was required to do it.
You can have it good and expensive, or bad and cheap. You can't have it good and cheap.
#57
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
It seems that there is an increase of pax outraged by the deterioration of Economy..they remember the days of better, wider seats, free bags and a meal every flight. What they forget is that the deterioration in service and comfort is matched by a deterioration in price.
To be fair, this is asymmetrical. In some markets, the airline cartel in conjunction with complicit governments have eliminated competition and raised fares in addition to deteriorating service and more junk fees. In other markets, competition has driven prices down to historic lows. On net, for my mix of routes, I've benefited. (TATL routes and west coast U.S. routes make up a lot of my travel.) But there are other routes where I can understand why people are mad. They see airlines posting record profits, delivering a bad product, and don't get the benefit of the low fares.
You can have it good and expensive, or bad and cheap. You can't have it good and cheap.
#58
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DTW, but drive to/from YYZ/ORD
Programs: Chase Ultimate Rewards 2MM, Diner Club points
Posts: 31,920
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,573
Indeed. Since the product hasn't standardized completely across the industry, you have to look closely at each airline and aircraft type to figure out what you're getting. The CX product I'm looking at for next year is 40x20, which seems like it's on the better end of PE offerings. Can't tell degrees of recline yet, but I would think there's some (?) correlation between pitch and recline. More room for recline in a 40" config than a 36" one. At least I would hope...
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,573
It seems that there is an increase of pax outraged by the deterioration of Economy..they remember the days of better, wider seats, free bags and a meal every flight. What they forget is that the deterioration in service and comfort is matched by a deterioration in price.
Sure, it's cramped and there are fees for what used to be included..but the fact is, you can fly across the country for a few hundred dollars. You can fly in a region for under 200 dollars. Flying is now affordable to the lower classes in a way it never was before. People who used to take Greyhound can now fly. And the reason this is so is because airlines have figured out how to capture marketshare by dropping the frills and lowering the price. The consumer benefits by getting cheap fares.
So if you complain about the loss of amenities, remember how much tix were when those were included. Flying today is easy compared with 20+ years ago when a higher % of your income was required to do it.
You can have it good and expensive, or bad and cheap. You can't have it good and cheap.
Sure, it's cramped and there are fees for what used to be included..but the fact is, you can fly across the country for a few hundred dollars. You can fly in a region for under 200 dollars. Flying is now affordable to the lower classes in a way it never was before. People who used to take Greyhound can now fly. And the reason this is so is because airlines have figured out how to capture marketshare by dropping the frills and lowering the price. The consumer benefits by getting cheap fares.
So if you complain about the loss of amenities, remember how much tix were when those were included. Flying today is easy compared with 20+ years ago when a higher % of your income was required to do it.
You can have it good and expensive, or bad and cheap. You can't have it good and cheap.