Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Lipstick usage by check-in agents?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Lipstick usage by check-in agents?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 4:01 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Africa
Programs: Flying Blue, Skywards, HHonors
Posts: 24
Lipstick usage by check-in agents?

I run a GHA and just had a fairly major airline complain about one of my check-in staff for not using lipstick!

She had gone au naturel regarding her lips and I could not really see the problem.

I know most major airlines have rules regarding lipstick tones etc for cabin crew but I had never thought that airlines might like this applied to contracted ground staff too!

How offended would you be if your check-in agent had chosen to not apply lipstick?

(She was checking in Economy class pax if that makes a difference).
australflyer is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 4:11 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TAS
Programs: A3*G, UA 1K
Posts: 9,252
As a passenger, I couldn't care less.

Some airlines do have standards and dress codes and want those standards/dress codes followed worldwide to project some type of image. That would probably be specified in some contract that you signed with them.
Palal is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 5:20 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,871
as Palal said, some are likely able to fire employees for not following requirements.
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 5:49 pm
  #4  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: LCY
Programs: BAEC Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 1,208
I am really bemused by airlines' obsession with lipstick and the notion that one is not groomed *without* lipstick.

Originally Posted by australflyer

How offended would you be if your check-in agent had chosen to not apply lipstick?
As a passenger I care more about courtesy and efficiency. Will I care about the check agents lipstick if I'm queuing for hours in some outstation? Of course not

That said, if the airline has complained then it would be in your (and your staff's) interest to comply or come to an agreement. Did said airline stipulate any dress code prior to this?
GadgetGal is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 5:55 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,259
Could care less.
coachrowsey is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 5:57 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 20,271
Really? Lipstick?
And not just any lipstick. Not that kind that's lip colored. Apparently it has to be noticeably colored.
Would they object to Goth black?
Hey, it's lipstick.
rickg523 is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 5:58 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Africa
Programs: Flying Blue, Skywards, HHonors
Posts: 24
These are contracted ground staff in an undesirable African location, dealing with expat road warriors and locals and the odd tourist!

In my mind, it is hard to take seriouslythis request as our main aim is to get all pax airside asap with minimum discomfort in the given circumstance.

I can provide my staff with the latest Chloe lipstick (or whatever) but it just adds to the cost of local passenger handling...

We already provide them with footwear, sock/stockings, sunglasses etc so it is hard to believe what more the airlines or the health and safety inspectors could want?

And now the airlines want lipstick!

If you work for a GHA at JFK do you get lipstick,. sunglasses, socks/stockings?

I seriously doubt it!

Do GHAs at JFK provide lipstick to staff?

Rant over!
australflyer is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 5:59 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Africa
Programs: Flying Blue, Skywards, HHonors
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by GadgetGal
Did said airline stipulate any dress code prior to this?
Nothing in the SLA!

But I always like to apease!
australflyer is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 6:05 pm
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
Rather than focusing on the lipstick, does the agent have a polished and well groomed appearance? This, plus competence, politeness, and cordiality are what should matter. A really good agent will go above and beyond when appropriate and be able to solve problems, etc.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 6:11 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 20,271
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
Rather than focusing on the lipstick, does the agent have a polished and well groomed appearance? This, plus competence, politeness, and cordiality are what should matter. A really good agent will go above and beyond when appropriate and be able to solve problems, etc.
+1
rickg523 is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 6:14 pm
  #11  
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SJC/SFO
Programs: WN A+ CP, UA 1MM/*A Gold, Mar LT Tit, IHG Plat, HH Dia
Posts: 6,377
I'll offer two reactions:

As a customer I am not bothered at all if front desk staff choose not to wear lipstick. I certainly always appreciate a professional appearance, including matching uniforms that fit and are kept neat and clean, well groomed hair, and good personal hygiene. Makeup is not really a part of that to me-- except as a negative, when it's applied poorly (often when used excessively). More important to me than any appearance issues, though, are the staff's professional behavior and competence.

As a business savvy person I am bothered that your client thinks it's okay to add arbitrary requirements not documented in your contract. That is not professional. Call them on it!
darthbimmer is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2016 | 1:47 am
  #12  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 602
For the passenger it's beyond irrelevant, I can't imagine anyone seriously complaining about this. It's however in your interest to accommodate your customers' needs, regardless whether you see any justification for it. If a customer sees a problem the last thing they want to hear is you volunteering your opinion that there isn't any. If such a requirement is not part of the original contract though, an opportunity to make a pricing adjustment might have just opened up.

Last edited by ProleOnParole; Jul 28, 2016 at 1:58 am
ProleOnParole is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2016 | 3:24 am
  #13  
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 16,064
Are your staff wearing your uniforms or customer uniforms? If the former, then your uniform standards would prevail, whatever those may be. If the latter, then the customer can specify grooming standards but must provide all items to support the grooming standards specified.
B747-437B is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2016 | 6:04 am
  #14  
100k
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NYS
Programs: Days of Our Lives, General Hospital
Posts: 1,543
Originally Posted by B747-437B
Are your staff wearing your uniforms or customer uniforms? If the former, then your uniform standards would prevail, whatever those may be. If the latter, then the customer can specify grooming standards but must provide all items to support the grooming standards specified.
This could also be relevant at small U.S. airports like my local one, where the same employees provide ground services for all airlines.
kochleffel is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2016 | 6:05 am
  #15  
100k
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NYS
Programs: Days of Our Lives, General Hospital
Posts: 1,543
BTW, are we talking about male or female employees?
kochleffel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.