Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

high-end hotels usually disappointing?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

high-end hotels usually disappointing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2016, 4:28 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
high-end hotels usually disappointing?

Anybody else find that with high-end places one usually is disappointed? Because one has paid so much and has such high expectations (or the reviews posted here are so great) and they just don't meet that.

Whereas my $11 hotel room in Siem Reap is great. Included airport shuttle, breakfast (admittedly just toast and eggs), front desk people were very hospitable when I arrived, showed me a map with the places to eat around town, room was bearable and had no bugs!
s0ssos is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 4:49 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: LH SEN; BA Gold
Posts: 8,406
No. I'm rarely disappointed by high-end places.
WorldLux is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 5:10 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,314
Never underestimate the value of what paying more does to one's ego.

Even if it's a turd in a golden shell.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 5:36 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 5,980
I think it depends on what you think are "high-end" hotels. Lot of people think a Hilton, Marriott or Radisson Blu is a "high-end" hotel and spending $250 a night is a huge thing. Often enough they will be disappointed by ending up in a lean business hotel which just runs a business and not a place where you got treated like a king.

If you talk about real high-end luxury hotels, I rarely have been disappointed while at the regular 4 to 5 Star business hotels the experiences are very mixed.
fassy is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 7:42 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
as fassy said, you are not visiting the right "hotels"

"hotel" does not even begin to describe the best properties
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 7:49 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,227
Perhaps I've not visited the right hotels but I am usually underwhelmed by high end places. The rooms may be bigger and the carpets thicker but I dislike lobbies chock full of jewellers and peddlars of luxury knick-knacks and I have a healthy disdain for the criminal end of the spectrum of fellow guests.

But they are certainly much nicer than branded chain hotels which are way overpriced and often not nice at all.
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 7:59 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,010
I think it depends on the value you ascribe to what drives a "high end" hotel. Your $11 hotel probably didn't have "1000-knot-per-inch, hand woven from baby silkworms raised on a vegan diet" rugs, and the like. Some people find the "luxury" of these items - the visuals - etc., worth the money.

It's a bit like some people value the mechanical complexity and elegance of a multi-thousand dollar Swiss mechanical chronograph and other see that a $10 quartz watch will keep better time.

I'm typically fine with a nice, clean Fairfield, Holiday Inn Express, etc. for personal travel, and a middle of the road Marriott, Westin, etc., for family. We've had stays at high end properties, and don't derive much value out of the fancy stuff.
CPRich is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 8:19 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok or San Francisco
Programs: United 1k, Marriott Lifetime PE, Former DL Gold, Former SQ Solitaire, HH Gold
Posts: 11,886
Originally Posted by s0ssos
Anybody else find that with high-end places one usually is disappointed? Because one has paid so much and has such high expectations (or the reviews posted here are so great) and they just don't meet that.

Whereas my $11 hotel room in Siem Reap is great. Included airport shuttle, breakfast (admittedly just toast and eggs), front desk people were very hospitable when I arrived, showed me a map with the places to eat around town, room was bearable and had no bugs!
I stay at Marriott properties if they are available. If it's short term I stay at a JW. Long term I look for an MEA.

Is it worth it? Well, to start with when I describe the food or the bed or the room or any other amenity say "admittedly just ......". There is a difference between a King size bed with box springs, deep mattress, comforter, duvet, etc. and a small bed with a 2 inch mattress on a wooden box. Yes, you can sleep. Yes, there is a difference.

I won't stay at a hotel that is lower quality than my own home. Why should I? Why would anyone?
Tchiowa is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 8:24 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SYD
Programs: QF
Posts: 490
The sleep quality is roughly the same but i have never been disappointed by the high end treatment.
CitizenWorld is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 8:31 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,573
I have expectations that are tailored to the property whether it is a cheap and cheerful place or a high end hotel - for example, I was very disappointed in a Mandarin Oriental a few years ago, consistently the phone was not being answered, not only when I called internally, but also when people were calling the hotel trying to be put through to my room. I expect a 5 star property to answer the phone within a couple of rings each and every time. I don't expect a small family run motel / B&B to do that tho.
emma69 is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 8:55 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Originally Posted by emma69
I have expectations that are tailored to the property whether it is a cheap and cheerful place or a high end hotel...
This is the right answer. One can be equally pleased and satisfied with a clean, basic, friendly two-star motel or some lush, opulent five-star compound. What is more, a genuinely sophisticated person knows how to make him/herself comfortable in either setting.

Announcing that less ambitious hotels are "below my personal standards," etc. is no sign of sophistication, no matter how long you've subscribed to Conde Nast Traveler and all that glossy, schlocky travel porn.

Carping about lack of gold-plated sink taps in a basic place, OR finding endless nitpicky fault with the sheet thread counts, etc. in a luxury place where people are turning handstands to make guests happy, is a big red flag in a human being.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 9:12 am
  #12  
formerly known as Tad's Broiled Steaks
Shangri-La Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,412
On paper, the nicest place I've stayed was The Peninsula HK. At the other end of the spectrum, I've spent a night in a stall at HKG.

Once I'm asleep, nothing else - amenities, service, noise levels - matters. Until I'm asleep, I'm probably relaxing in bed.

That's probably why my favorite part about any hotel is the possibility of a vast breakfast spread...
BuildingMyBento is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 9:22 am
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
I guess it is funny how things that should be individual preferences (like bed firmness) can be universalized, how Westin calls their bed "heavenly", and many other properties make similar claims about their beds.

Don't people have different tastes? Yet how can one hotel be "great"? Maybe some people like gold-finish, and some hate it.

But when I stay at a nice place, I expect it to be nicer than a normal place. But, as emma69 pointed out, it doesn't mean "better staffed" and sometimes things fall short. And sometimes at cheaper places people are more informal and say things that make you feel welcomed, like "welcome back VIP" (for a person who stays frequently) in a joking, smiling manner, that wouldn't befit a "5 star" hotel.
s0ssos is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 9:31 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 436
Originally Posted by CPRich
I think it depends on the value you ascribe to what drives a "high end" hotel. Your $11 hotel probably didn't have "1000-knot-per-inch, hand woven from baby silkworms raised on a vegan diet" rugs
I don't want to meet any non-vegan silkworms. Sounds like the plot of a bad science fiction movie.
udontknowme is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2016, 9:53 am
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
Originally Posted by s0ssos
Anybody else find that with high-end places one usually is disappointed? Because one has paid so much and has such high expectations (or the reviews posted here are so great) and they just don't meet that.
No, not usually disappointed at a well-run luxury property.

I've certainly been disappointed at some mainline Marriott/Hilton/Starwoods that were charging a high-end price because I happened to be there at a peak time. (Frankly, there are a lot of these in NYC that don't live up to expectations.) But if I'm at a Ritz or Four Seasons, it almost always delivers.

I don't go out of my way to book these kinds of places for personal trips...if I want something luxurious with my own dollar, it's usually a small boutique or B&B. These places, at the luxury end of the scale, are often incredible.

And in a weird un-flyertalk kind of way, refreshing to know that no guests are on uneven footing due to varying elite statuses. You book a specific room and that's what you almost always end up occupying.

Whereas my $11 hotel room in Siem Reap is great. Included airport shuttle, breakfast (admittedly just toast and eggs), front desk people were very hospitable when I arrived, showed me a map with the places to eat around town, room was bearable and had no bugs!
I don't do as many of those anymore, but yes...I get the sentiment. Did a lot more of them backpacking at a 10-15 year younger age.
pinniped is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.