Oh no; 11 across to replace 10!
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist

Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: BA Gold, QF WP
Posts: 12,551
#17
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IAD
Posts: 2,060
I was wondering something along those lines as well, and thought maybe it was a safety issue to not have more than 3 seats in a row. In an emergency you'd have to possibly climb over two people. In a 5-seat middle section, that middle guy would have to climb over two people in either direction. I wonder if that's considered the safe maximum number of "bodies" to climb over?
#18


Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,760
I was wondering something along those lines as well, and thought maybe it was a safety issue to not have more than 3 seats in a row. In an emergency you'd have to possibly climb over two people. In a 5-seat middle section, that middle guy would have to climb over two people in either direction. I wonder if that's considered the safe maximum number of "bodies" to climb over?
The a380 was approved with two aisles I don't think it would be feasible to consider a single aisle design.
#19

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: ECP
Programs: DL Diamond
Posts: 1,660
If the seat width can be accommodated to acceptable/normal levels can somebody explain how this is worse than 2-5-2 for the center section or 3-3-3 for the side sections?
(Assuming of course, that they can put enough FAs, lavs, etc to handle the load of pax)
(Assuming of course, that they can put enough FAs, lavs, etc to handle the load of pax)
#20
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
#21
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
I was wondering something along those lines as well, and thought maybe it was a safety issue to not have more than 3 seats in a row. In an emergency you'd have to possibly climb over two people. In a 5-seat middle section, that middle guy would have to climb over two people in either direction. I wonder if that's considered the safe maximum number of "bodies" to climb over?
#22
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
Could they omit the armrests at windows?
Or could the armrest just take width at elbow level and underneath just be a thin piece of metal underneath if the arm rest doesn't go up, so that at hip level the armrest takes no inches at all. Implicitly, I'm talking about measuring seat width at the hip rather than elbow level so that the arm rests don't count against the total available space.
Or could the armrest just take width at elbow level and underneath just be a thin piece of metal underneath if the arm rest doesn't go up, so that at hip level the armrest takes no inches at all. Implicitly, I'm talking about measuring seat width at the hip rather than elbow level so that the arm rests don't count against the total available space.
#24




Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Let me check my Logbook
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards; AAdvantage; Alaska Mileage Plan; Wyndham Rewards; Choice Hotels
Posts: 2,406
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 46,452

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Weste...eafbd075da2243
I must say that looks pretty nice.
#26
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,452
Do some examination of DC-10:
http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/com...s/dc10sec2.pdf
Cross-sections pages 17-20, seatmaps pages 13-16.
The typical tourist accommodation, page 18, is indeed 8 abreast. 20 inch aisles, 44 inch seat pairs (NOT broken down to seat/armrest widths), some object in the middle 8 inch wide.
9 abreast economy seating, page 19, does provide seatback widths - 18,0 inch each and 2,0 inch armrests leave the space for 19,0 inch aisles. Note that 2-5-2 economy is not typical and neither is 3-3-3 - the typical configuration is 2-4-3.
First class, page 17, is 6 abreast - but seat pairs are mere 54 inch wide - 20 inch seatbacks - while leaving typical 31 inch wide aisles. Erm... you could easily have 22 inch aisles and 60 inch seat pairs. Or 19 inch aisles and 62 inch seat pairs.
Typical seatmap, page 13. Note how economy class pitch is 34 inch throughout, and 8 abreast. And the 6 abreast first class pitch is just 38 inch - 4 inches bigger.
How has your experience been in these 20x38 inch first class seats of DC-10?
http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/com...s/dc10sec2.pdf
Cross-sections pages 17-20, seatmaps pages 13-16.
The typical tourist accommodation, page 18, is indeed 8 abreast. 20 inch aisles, 44 inch seat pairs (NOT broken down to seat/armrest widths), some object in the middle 8 inch wide.
9 abreast economy seating, page 19, does provide seatback widths - 18,0 inch each and 2,0 inch armrests leave the space for 19,0 inch aisles. Note that 2-5-2 economy is not typical and neither is 3-3-3 - the typical configuration is 2-4-3.
First class, page 17, is 6 abreast - but seat pairs are mere 54 inch wide - 20 inch seatbacks - while leaving typical 31 inch wide aisles. Erm... you could easily have 22 inch aisles and 60 inch seat pairs. Or 19 inch aisles and 62 inch seat pairs.
Typical seatmap, page 13. Note how economy class pitch is 34 inch throughout, and 8 abreast. And the 6 abreast first class pitch is just 38 inch - 4 inches bigger.
How has your experience been in these 20x38 inch first class seats of DC-10?
#27
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 46,452
My first experience on a DC-10 was CO 001 between IAH and LAX, circa 1985. My mom and I were upgraded to F (3 cabin), and I was simply blown away by how plush it was (I might have been young, and therefore smaller, at the time, but the pitch was a hell of a lot more generous than 38"); business class looked pretty nice, as well.
Last edited by moondog; Nov 12, 2013 at 4:59 am
#28
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,452
My first experience on a DC-10 was CO 001 between IAH and LAX, circa 1985. My mom and I were upgraded to F (3 cabin), and was simply blown away by how plush it was (I might have been young, and therefore smaller, at the time, but the pitch was a hell of a lot more generous than 38"); business class looked pretty nice, as well.
The airplane cross-section is identical. So is the 10 abreast seating.
But none of the others.
The typical 9 abreast cross-section of MD-11 has exact same 18,0 inch seatbacks, 2,0 inch armrests and 19,0 inch aisles as DC-10 - but 9 abreast MD-11 is 2-5-2, not 2-4-3 like DC-10.
MD-11 has no 8 abreast cross-section. DC-10 has no 7 abreast cross-section.
First class is 6 abreast on both DC-10 and MD-11. But spot the difference. DC-10 has 31 inch aisles and 20 inch seatbacks. MD-11 has aisles 4,5 inches narrower, still at 26,5 inches, and seats 1,5 inches wider, at 21,5 inch.
And look at the 7 abreast business class. Yes, there is not the 8 inch wide middle armrest of first class - all armrests are 3,0 inch, like the aisle armrests of first class. But even with 25,25 inch aisles, the MD-11 business class seats are, at 20,5 inch seatback, wider than the 20,0 inch first class seats of DC-10.
Pitch? Well, MD-11 does not specify the pitch on seatmaps, unlike DC-10. But note that MD-11 mixed class, page 7, has 34 first class seats ahead of first doors, while DC-10 has 48 seats ahead of these doors.
Would you rather sit in DC-10 first class, 20,0 inch wide, or in MD-11 business class 20,5 inch wide?
#29
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,379

Well kb1992, good for you and congratulations on your prestige level.
However, there are some pensioners on here who may only fly a few times in their golden years and who will never see the inside of an MLL, or indeed an Executive class seat or travel on anything but a Tango fare, except on their long walk back to Air Canada's new steerage class seating in 77HDs!
Back in the UK in the 50s the phrase "I'm allright Jack" was quite common.
Thanks for reminding me of it with your amusing but sad posting.
#30
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 454
I see what he wants - to lift the seats a few inches so that elbow level corresponds to the widest part of the fuselage - see here. However I have no idea how he envisages "raising the floor under the seats. It is certainly not going to be a structural redesign of the aircraft!
And that's before I say anything about his comment about the "proper seat count"...

And that's before I say anything about his comment about the "proper seat count"...
On a more serious note, I do think this 11 seat thingy will work and it probably won't be as dreadful as most people thing. As long as they develop some new seats, adjust the height and remove some giant arm rests it will not be that bad.

