Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

obese pax denied boarding

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

obese pax denied boarding

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2012, 1:56 pm
  #76  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
I wonder whether the couple lacked medical insurance which would cover care given while outside the US? That may be an (unstated) reason why they were so insistent on flying back to America to receive care, instead of being emergently treated in Europe.
artemis is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2012, 2:15 pm
  #77  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: All over
Programs: Most
Posts: 10,839
I really cannot see how an airline can be sued for not transporting a pax like this and blamed for death?



The image is linked from the newspaper article above.
holtju2 is online now  
Old Nov 27, 2012, 2:34 pm
  #78  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 205
The articles describe how "the fire brigade and technical experts" tried for thirty minutes, unsuccessfully, to get her seated. And that was at a gate, with the lights on, the aircraft right-side-up, and no smoke or panic. Now imagine an emergency evacuation, with a hundred people trying to exit the aircraft in thirty SECONDS, perhaps with smoke and fire or with the aircraft lying on its side with structural damage.

This woman would have been a safety risk to everyone on that plane in an emergency.
airships is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2012, 5:05 pm
  #79  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,335
Originally Posted by holtju2
I really cannot see how an airline can be sued for not transporting a pax like this and blamed for death?



The image is linked from the newspaper article above.
Wow! She's big!! It's disgusting!! She ate too much foods. That's why she got sick. She doesn't do exercise very well. She never was.

Right, the airline is not their fault for her death. They didn't blame them. She had it rights to be on transporting. Unfortunately, there's was no way to put her in the aircraft. She is not physically. She didn't have a disability rights.
N830MH is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2012, 5:26 pm
  #80  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: south of WAS DC
Posts: 10,131
Originally Posted by Jaimito Cartero
I know people in this weight range who fly on a weekly basis. Not missing a leg, obviously. She flew out there in two seats, even if she gained some weight, she should be able to make it back. I'd guess it was more than the weight.

Physique-wise, it also depends on body type. Muscle compared to fat, and such. I've known a number of FTers in the 300-350 range who fly in single coach seats.
i fly every now and then. even to texas. i have never seen an obese person like her on a plane, even in two seats. you know 425's that fly regularly? where i find them? in single seats in coach? gimmie a break. i've seen big people in coach, i have never suffered the misery of sitting next to a 425 lb er, never.
slawecki is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2012, 6:11 pm
  #81  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: California
Posts: 2,731
Originally Posted by artemis
I wonder whether the couple lacked medical insurance which would cover care given while outside the US? That may be an (unstated) reason why they were so insistent on flying back to America to receive care, instead of being emergently treated in Europe.
I'd wondered the same thing. However, the article says the husband is a security guard for the Staten Island Ferry, which is part of the NYC Dept. of Transportation. Although there have been attempts to trend away from this in many places, generally one gets pretty good benefits from a government job as a trade-off for the lower salary. Note also that he can take off work for several weeks of vacation all at once...

I suspect that if my horrible, high-deductible, individual market plan reimburses for treatment abroad (and it does), this guy's policy offered by the NYC government would. But one never knows.

Last edited by fwoomp; Nov 27, 2012 at 6:12 pm Reason: Left out a word
fwoomp is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2012, 8:33 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
Originally Posted by N830MH
Wow! She's big!! It's disgusting!! She ate too much foods. That's why she got sick. She doesn't do exercise very well. She never was.

Right, the airline is not their fault for her death. They didn't blame them. She had it rights to be on transporting. Unfortunately, there's was no way to put her in the aircraft. She is not physically. She didn't have a disability rights.
Yowser! I cannot imagine why anyone would think it is a good idea to make a transatlantic trip to spend some time in a European vacation home when you see the shape this woman was in. What on earth were she and her husband thinking ?

I also note that they are confident enough to go to Hungary, stay there, eat there (obviously), but not confident enough in their medical system to seek treatment there (and let's face it, whatever their medical care was in the US prior to this did not exactly solve this woman's medical condition)

Sorry, but her husband is obviously looking for a scapegoat, but he and his wife should shoulder most, if not all the blame for what happened.
mapleg is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2012, 8:36 pm
  #83  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
Originally Posted by Stripe
As usual in these cases, the lesson here is to travel with medical evacuation insurance. Especially if you are in ill health.

.
You really think any insurance company on the planet would have covered that risk?
mapleg is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2012, 8:53 pm
  #84  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: 0°48′24″N 176°36′59″W
Programs: Taiwan is a country.
Posts: 1,206
Woman has no business trying to get accommodated on public transport.
Airline seats are small enough as it is for "regular" people. She needed a medevac (though unsure she'd fit thru the door of that). She made her life choice, and life made its choice.

[Inappropriate text edited by Moderator.]

Last edited by Ocn Vw 1K; Nov 29, 2012 at 10:42 am Reason: Per FT Rules.
deadinabsentia is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2012, 9:31 pm
  #85  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SAN
Posts: 56
This is a tragedy on so many levels that obviously started years ago.

I feel sorry for this woman's family, but this couple obviously made several bad decisions in a row that led to this unhappy end.

I typed and typed and typed and I've deleted it all... too many obvious things to state regarding this sad case.
KenS is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2012, 12:06 am
  #86  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CHI
Programs: UA 1K, MR Titanium, IHG Gold, National Exec
Posts: 3,842
In the end, this has nothing to do with obesity or health or disability or even safety. It is simply a case of physical size. Imagine if every human on that flight were a self-propelled (or perhaps motorised wheelchair-propelled) piece of cargo. Would there be such a furore if a piece of cargo had to be transported alternately because it could not fit on the plane? That just the reality of this woman's situation.

Her death wasn't caused by the airlines, it was caused (or at least certainly not prevented) by the fact her and her husband were stupid enough to refuse healthcare in an EU and OECD (i.e. developed) country when she needed it. It's not the fat American tourists giving America a bad name, it's the stupid ones.
Santander is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2012, 1:15 am
  #87  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cypress Hills Research Center
Posts: 5,295
So I now wonder if some ADA affiliated group will push for a requirement on the part of US airlines to have one row in the larger non-regional planes set aside for extremely obese passengers. Maybe the last row of Y on one side of the aircraft would be configured as an extra large single seat with the row ahead removed to create a large enough space to allow COS to be seated. I doubt that removing four or six seats to accommodate one COS (and maybe one other pax) would be considered a "reasonable accommodation" under the ADA, but you never know.

A side question. How does a pax as heavy and seemingly immobile as the lady in the article use the lav? Perhaps that's a subject best left unexplored.
uszkanni is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2012, 1:28 am
  #88  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 206
The article suggested that she gained weight during her time in Hungary. Looking at the photo posted this makes sense as her shirt seems to fit very poorly. My first thought was that since the airline got her there, they needed to get her home, but if she really gained a significant amount of volume while away it seems reasonable that she wasn't able to make it home. Sad but not the airline's fault.
ryanthekiwi is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2012, 1:49 am
  #89  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Marino
Posts: 69
Originally Posted by pinniped
That was my first thought...with the second being that Hungary isn't exactly a remote village in sub-Saharan Africa. While it's not the first place I'd choose for an elective surgery, I wouldn't refuse emergency medical treatment there either.

I fail to see how the airline is to blame.
I think that Hungary is a country in which you can find fair healthcare establishments, and Wien is only 250km far from Budapest.

Last edited by 998R; Nov 28, 2012 at 2:06 am
998R is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2012, 2:12 am
  #90  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Programs: Miles & More, Amex
Posts: 678
Originally Posted by airships
The articles describe how "the fire brigade and technical experts" tried for thirty minutes, unsuccessfully, to get her seated. And that was at a gate, with the lights on, the aircraft right-side-up, and no smoke or panic. Now imagine an emergency evacuation, with a hundred people trying to exit the aircraft in thirty SECONDS, perhaps with smoke and fire or with the aircraft lying on its side with structural damage.

This woman would have been a safety risk to everyone on that plane in an emergency.
Well said. ^ And this is the point where the mobility issue comes into play. No wonder why the airlines refused to transport her. Just imagine an emergency situation in which she manages to get into the isle by herself and then fails to move on. Frankly said, I really don't want to be in the same isle during such an incident.
Scrooge McDuck is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.