obese pax denied boarding
#61
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Formerly at PIT, now planted near MSP.
Programs: No flights since April 2019 (Medical Issues). Lost all my status.
Posts: 1,483
Updated: Yikes. I just looked at the photos. I was assuming the two 400 pounders were mobile.
Last edited by RRDD; Nov 27, 2012 at 8:38 am
#62
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
If the woman was 5'8", then it has to be hard to even move at 425.
#64
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Gold, Hyatt something
Posts: 33,544
Physique-wise, it also depends on body type. Muscle compared to fat, and such. I've known a number of FTers in the 300-350 range who fly in single coach seats.
#65
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BER
Programs: Hilton Gold, BA Gold
Posts: 15,757
#66
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
I know people in this weight range who fly on a weekly basis. Not missing a leg, obviously. She flew out there in two seats, even if she gained some weight, she should be able to make it back. I'd guess it was more than the weight.
Physique-wise, it also depends on body type. Muscle compared to fat, and such. I've known a number of FTers in the 300-350 range who fly in single coach seats.
Physique-wise, it also depends on body type. Muscle compared to fat, and such. I've known a number of FTers in the 300-350 range who fly in single coach seats.
I also know some taller, bigger guys who are probably in the 300-350 range who can fly Y (one seat) if they have to. One of my friends in this range actually bought annual E+ access on UA as soon as it became available and then shifted all his travel to them. (Eventually he became 1K and didn't need to re-buy the access.) Buying extra pitch isn't as good as buying extra width, but it does help some - especially if you're in an aisle seat.
#67
#68
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,332
#69
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,735
You're confusing "won't allow" with "not physically possible" and the seatbelt extenders had nothing to do with the fire crew not being able to get her into the aircraft.
#71
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 107
While I prefer it over being carried like a sack of potatoes, I cannot agree that it isn't as dangerous as it looks. I have been carried up and down the steps in aisle chairs multiple times, and every time it was scary. One time, the person at the bottom nearly slipped on the steps. I've decided that I will only fly to cities where they use jet bridges after that experience. That way I only have to worry about it if there is a diversion, or some other unforeseen reason for it. It's a long way down to the ground on some of those stairs or ladders. If I had actually fallen, i would have fallen like a sack of potatoes.
Eventually, my spouse will not be able to assist me and I want to get in every bit of of traveling that I can while we are both able to manage together.
#72
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PHL
Posts: 877
She apparently died two days after LH denied her boarding. Someone that sick at baseline (diabetes leading to amputation and end-stage renal disease, with a component of morbid obesity) should not have elected to travel somewhere that - their lawyer now implies - does not have adequate medical care for her conditions.
It's entirely possible she took on significant water volume as her kidneys got acutely worse, making it more difficult to accommodate her on the return trip than it was on the outbound. And she certainly should have gone to a doctor as her condition deteriorated rather than traveling to various airports. Why they feel the airlines are at fault for ultimately refusing to unsafely transport a passenger despite multiple efforts is beyond me.
Based on the information available to the public, this is a intuitively nonsensical lawsuit. And a very sad case indeed.
It's entirely possible she took on significant water volume as her kidneys got acutely worse, making it more difficult to accommodate her on the return trip than it was on the outbound. And she certainly should have gone to a doctor as her condition deteriorated rather than traveling to various airports. Why they feel the airlines are at fault for ultimately refusing to unsafely transport a passenger despite multiple efforts is beyond me.
Based on the information available to the public, this is a intuitively nonsensical lawsuit. And a very sad case indeed.
#73
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Zealand/ UK
Programs: NZ, EK, QF, SQ.
Posts: 776
While I prefer it over being carried like a sack of potatoes, I cannot agree that it isn't as dangerous as it looks. I have been carried up and down the steps in aisle chairs multiple times, and every time it was scary. One time, the person at the bottom nearly slipped on the steps. I've decided that I will only fly to cities where they use jet bridges after that experience. That way I only have to worry about it if there is a diversion, or some other unforeseen reason for it. It's a long way down to the ground on some of those stairs or ladders. If I had actually fallen, i would have fallen like a sack of potatoes.
My son was boarded like this after he had a leg amputation.
#74
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NCL
Programs: UA 1MM/*G. DL Gold for one more year.
Posts: 5,305
#75
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: PVD
Programs: Delta PM, HHonors Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 294
What I'm trying to say is that even after they've driven to Prague, the lady could have gotten top class health care and could have been saved. It was solely her choice not to accept this and insist on going back to the US, until she eventually died of kidney failure.
Her stupidity completely. And I'd say that the husband is obviously trying to take advantage of an unfortunate event.