Separating user files from the OS drive
#16



Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DAL
Posts: 2,231
Keeping all data copies on premise hasn’t prevented very large company data breaches. SolarWinds was breached resulting in their clients being breached. The routine software update notification was infected.
#17
Original Poster

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,739
).
#19

Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 156
My setup
- Tiny 120GB SSD is inexpensive.
- Much faster boot up than a HDD.
- I clone the SSD to another SSD.
- If OS crashes, I just swap in the cloned SSD. The data files are saved.
- I can installed the cloned SSD on a different computer.
#20

Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 156
Problem with My Documents
This PC > Documents > folder name
#21
Original Poster

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,739
Usually the documents folder is mapped to c:\users\documents. Technically you could remap that (eg, most corporations usually redirect it to "h" drive which usually points to a share of some sort) but most don't.
#22


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: RDU
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 334
Had an interesting conversation this morning with someone. We were talking about new computers/workstations. I had mentioned that I prefer to have a separate "drive" for my user data, whether it would be a physical or logical. The other person said it was too much of a hassle and no real point as long as you kept the data in a separate folder (ala My Documents). I'm curious what others think about this. Do you use a separate "drive" (can be NAS or anything) or do you just put your user data (documents or media or whatever) in another folder?
There is no right or wrong, Just curious if I'm one of the outliers on how I organize my files (given the choice) or were they? (As long as it works for you, that's cool)
There is no right or wrong, Just curious if I'm one of the outliers on how I organize my files (given the choice) or were they? (As long as it works for you, that's cool)
#23
Original Poster

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,739
Late to the party, but not separate partitions, there's no need for that if you're using just one drive, really, but definitely on a separate hard disk (when possible, i.e. not on a laptop). My desktop has a small 240GB SSD for the OS, and a 2TB NVMe for the user directories, plus a 2TB SATA drive that is purely used to back up the NVMe.
#24
In Memoriam




Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,111
I can see using a different drive would be easy on a fresh windows install, but is thee any easy and problem-free way for someone all of whose files (OS and data) are on C: to now do this?
#25
Original Poster

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,739
Depends on your situation. If you're using a desktop, you usually have spare bays that you could insert another HDD in. If you're using a laptop, it will depend on the make and model of your laptop (and where you use it). If you could provide some more details, perhaps we can give you some ideas.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 28,766
Windows Disk Management can do this, or there are plenty of free partitioning tools that you can download.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/...5-c9728f7d7d2e
#27




Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somewhere in Florida
Posts: 2,891
I used to do the separate drive thing for ages, but haven't in recent times. SSDs are too small for data storage, NAS systems offer better storage options than desktops.
I just use a regular directory called "data". That data directory is monitored by SyncThing on my desktop and laptop. I also have SyncThing on my phone, which shoots all of my photos (one-way) to a subdirectory in the Data directory. Additionally SyncThing syncs the Data directory, one-way, with file versioning, to a TrueNAS server sitting at one of my other homes, with snapshots enabled.
That directory also gets backed up locally, nightly, to an encrypted archive, to an external drive, which gets pushed out to Backblaze's B2.
All of my video stuff is on external drives due to size, encrypted locally, pushed out to Backblaze's regular desktop backup service. I love B2, but don't want to pay THAT much for my little 4K GoPro / phone videos.
Is this foolproof? Nothing is foolproof. I once went through 6 layers (3 physical systems, each had a primary and backup mode) of systems redundancy in one failure, with each of the 6 layers fail due to a different reason. BUT, this setup gives me a fighting chance. In the case where I blew through the 6 layers, the remains of each layer helped me bring everything back online within an hour.
I just use a regular directory called "data". That data directory is monitored by SyncThing on my desktop and laptop. I also have SyncThing on my phone, which shoots all of my photos (one-way) to a subdirectory in the Data directory. Additionally SyncThing syncs the Data directory, one-way, with file versioning, to a TrueNAS server sitting at one of my other homes, with snapshots enabled.
That directory also gets backed up locally, nightly, to an encrypted archive, to an external drive, which gets pushed out to Backblaze's B2.
All of my video stuff is on external drives due to size, encrypted locally, pushed out to Backblaze's regular desktop backup service. I love B2, but don't want to pay THAT much for my little 4K GoPro / phone videos.
Is this foolproof? Nothing is foolproof. I once went through 6 layers (3 physical systems, each had a primary and backup mode) of systems redundancy in one failure, with each of the 6 layers fail due to a different reason. BUT, this setup gives me a fighting chance. In the case where I blew through the 6 layers, the remains of each layer helped me bring everything back online within an hour.



