Gmail Changes - Default to Show External Content
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
But that request will be made when the mail arrives at Google, not when the user reads it. Thus it doesn't actually tell them anything useful other than it's a valid address (and Google might be fetching the images for invalid addresses just to defeat even this.)
#18
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SIN, PIE
Programs: AA-EXP, SQ-PPS, Marriott PP
Posts: 210
Thanks OP for bubbling this up. These types of scenarios are why i run Little Snitch on the Mac. Haven't tried their competitors, but if you dislike this marketing/tracking activity it's worth a test drive. Otherwise stick to a plain text only email client like Pine ;-)
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 14,059
(Bolding mine)
According to the article, the request is made when the email is opened.
According to the article, the request is made when the email is opened.
#20
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,771
That's actually a good point. So the user will still be identified, but perhaps that's all. And it seems like that might happen anyway, regardless of the image load setting I posted above, if Google is precaching images from incoming mail.
#21


Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Programs: AS Plat, UA MM, AA MM, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,167
There are 1,000 ways that Google could implement this, and it seems that marketers are scrambling to figure out exactly what their hits really mean.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 14,059
I don't know who is right here; the article linked above doesn't explicitly say when the request to load the external content is made. At first glance, it doesn't make sense for Google to preload all external content, so the latter approach (loading it when the email is opened -- which might never happen) makes the most sense. On the other hand, Google could use this to speed up their email interface, in which case they could choose to preload some content (such as static images) when the email arrives.
Doesn't that indicate third-party content is not pre-fetched when the email arrives at Google?
#23




Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Marriott Titanium, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,527
The caching part of this change happened over a week ago, so the implications have been extensively tested and are well understood at this time.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 14,059
So if Google caches the image, Google can now track who is opening emails, and they, not the advertiser, now have the location info? Smart.
#25


Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Programs: AS Plat, UA MM, AA MM, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,167
The article mentions "The Google server that temporarily stores the image contacts the Web address where the image is hosted only after a user opens the message," and that this was confirmed by third-party testing, where "Google servers didn't download the images until after he opened the Gmail message and viewed the remote content."
Doesn't that indicate third-party content is not pre-fetched when the email arrives at Google?
Doesn't that indicate third-party content is not pre-fetched when the email arrives at Google?
#26
Join Date: Jan 2011
Programs: AC*E, Accor Platinum, Hilton Silver
Posts: 184
Well, Google knew it always anyways. If you login/open emails via GMail, they already have your IP. This just means sender of an email won't get that info, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.

