Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

Gmail Changes - Default to Show External Content

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Gmail Changes - Default to Show External Content

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2013 | 7:05 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
I wish gmail would stop changing my settings.
Himeno is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2013 | 9:08 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
Originally Posted by gfunkdave
Many such images have custom URL components unique for each user - if that particular URL is fetched then the marketer knows that that user's copy of the image has been requested.
But that request will be made when the mail arrives at Google, not when the user reads it. Thus it doesn't actually tell them anything useful other than it's a valid address (and Google might be fetching the images for invalid addresses just to defeat even this.)
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013 | 8:03 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SIN, PIE
Programs: AA-EXP, SQ-PPS, Marriott PP
Posts: 210
Thanks OP for bubbling this up. These types of scenarios are why i run Little Snitch on the Mac. Haven't tried their competitors, but if you dislike this marketing/tracking activity it's worth a test drive. Otherwise stick to a plain text only email client like Pine ;-)
iadp is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013 | 8:32 am
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 14,059
(Bolding mine)
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
But that request will be made when the mail arrives at Google, not when the user reads it. Thus it doesn't actually tell them anything useful other than it's a valid address (and Google might be fetching the images for invalid addresses just to defeat even this.)
According to the article, the request is made when the email is opened.
nerd is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013 | 9:23 am
  #20  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,771
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
But that request will be made when the mail arrives at Google, not when the user reads it. Thus it doesn't actually tell them anything useful other than it's a valid address (and Google might be fetching the images for invalid addresses just to defeat even this.)
That's actually a good point. So the user will still be identified, but perhaps that's all. And it seems like that might happen anyway, regardless of the image load setting I posted above, if Google is precaching images from incoming mail.
gfunkdave is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013 | 10:04 am
  #21  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Programs: AS Plat, UA MM, AA MM, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,167
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
But that request will be made when the mail arrives at Google, not when the user reads it.
Originally Posted by nerd
According to the article, the request is made when the email is opened.
I don't know who is right here; the article linked above doesn't explicitly say when the request to load the external content is made. At first glance, it doesn't make sense for Google to preload all external content, so the latter approach (loading it when the email is opened -- which might never happen) makes the most sense. On the other hand, Google could use this to speed up their email interface, in which case they could choose to preload some content (such as static images) when the email arrives.

There are 1,000 ways that Google could implement this, and it seems that marketers are scrambling to figure out exactly what their hits really mean.
mikew99 is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013 | 10:16 am
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 14,059
Originally Posted by mikew99
I don't know who is right here; the article linked above doesn't explicitly say when the request to load the external content is made. At first glance, it doesn't make sense for Google to preload all external content, so the latter approach (loading it when the email is opened -- which might never happen) makes the most sense. On the other hand, Google could use this to speed up their email interface, in which case they could choose to preload some content (such as static images) when the email arrives.
The article mentions "The Google server that temporarily stores the image contacts the Web address where the image is hosted only after a user opens the message," and that this was confirmed by third-party testing, where "Google servers didn't download the images until after he opened the Gmail message and viewed the remote content."

Doesn't that indicate third-party content is not pre-fetched when the email arrives at Google?
nerd is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013 | 10:25 am
  #23  
2M
60 Nights
50 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Marriott Titanium, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,527
Originally Posted by nerd
Doesn't that indicate third-party content is not pre-fetched when the email arrives at Google?
It does, and as I said a dozen or more posts ago, that is exactly what is happening.

The caching part of this change happened over a week ago, so the implications have been extensively tested and are well understood at this time.
docbert is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013 | 10:35 am
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 14,059
Originally Posted by docbert
It's still causing pain for marketing/tracking images, because although they can tell you opened the email, they are not seeing many of the details that are normally visible (user agent/device time, IP address, etc).
The IP is useful in determining geographic location, I'm guessing?

So if Google caches the image, Google can now track who is opening emails, and they, not the advertiser, now have the location info? Smart.
nerd is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013 | 11:27 am
  #25  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Programs: AS Plat, UA MM, AA MM, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,167
Originally Posted by nerd
The article mentions "The Google server that temporarily stores the image contacts the Web address where the image is hosted only after a user opens the message," and that this was confirmed by third-party testing, where "Google servers didn't download the images until after he opened the Gmail message and viewed the remote content."

Doesn't that indicate third-party content is not pre-fetched when the email arrives at Google?
Whoops, I was referring to the blog article mentioned by docbert in post 14, not the article linked in the OP, which I hadn't even read. Mea culpa! At least that point is clear now.
mikew99 is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2013 | 11:03 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Programs: AC*E, Accor Platinum, Hilton Silver
Posts: 184
Originally Posted by nerd
The IP is useful in determining geographic location, I'm guessing?

So if Google caches the image, Google can now track who is opening emails, and they, not the advertiser, now have the location info? Smart.
Well, Google knew it always anyways. If you login/open emails via GMail, they already have your IP. This just means sender of an email won't get that info, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.
dawk is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.