Microsoft Surface Pro trashed by CNN
#1
Original Poster




Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Programs: VS Silver
Posts: 2,478
Microsoft Surface Pro trashed by CNN
Just saw the review for the Surface Pro on CNN, and they basically hated it. It runs full Windows 8 but said its more difficult to use than a laptop and too big and clunky to be a good tablet. The keyboard was said to be OK, but the trackpad is hard to use. The kickstand/keyboard arrangement means that it can't be used on your lap.
Has anyone on here actually used one yet?
Has anyone on here actually used one yet?
#2
In Memoriam
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
Since it's not been released officially yet, the number of people using it is going to be pretty slim.
See this thread for discussion on the surface tablets
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...t-surface.html
See this thread for discussion on the surface tablets
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...t-surface.html
#5
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 172
Here's a link to the CNN review. http://money.cnn.com/2013/02/05/tech...iew/index.html
The OP's characterization is rather misleading. Under their illustration, CNN's tagline was "Good not great." I read the review as very positive about some aspects and negative on the question of how it integrates Windows 8 and using legacy Windows programs.
But judge for yourself whether they 'basically hated it.'
The OP's characterization is rather misleading. Under their illustration, CNN's tagline was "Good not great." I read the review as very positive about some aspects and negative on the question of how it integrates Windows 8 and using legacy Windows programs.
But judge for yourself whether they 'basically hated it.'
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LON, ACK, BOS..... (Not necessarily in that order)
Programs: **Mucci Diamond Hairbrush** - compared to that nothing else matters (+BA Bronze)
Posts: 15,938
Just saw the review for the Surface Pro on CNN, and they basically hated it. It runs full Windows 8 but said its more difficult to use than a laptop and too big and clunky to be a good tablet. The keyboard was said to be OK, but the trackpad is hard to use. The kickstand/keyboard arrangement means that it can't be used on your lap.
Has anyone on here actually used one yet?
Has anyone on here actually used one yet?
#7




Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EWR, PHL
Programs: UA1k 3MM, AA Plt, peasant on everybody else, elite something or other at a bunch of hotels.
Posts: 4,648
But The Wall Street Journal, not so much:
Surface Pro: Hefty Tablet Is a Laptop Lightweight.
(Access may require a subscription.)
A few snips:
"But unlike the first (i.e. the "regular" Surface), this new tablet is capable of running full-featured Windows 8, though at a pricein dollars, bulk and battery life."
"It's too hefty and costly and power-hungry to best the leading tablet, Apple's full-size iPad."
"It lasted just under four hours between chargesless than half the stamina of the iPad on the same test and three hours less than the Surface RT."
"...it's compromised as a laptop. You get fewer ports and less storage than on many laptops and a keyboard that can't compare with those on many laptops."
But on the plus side:
"It ran all the software I threw at itboth the new type and the old desktop typespeedily and well."
The reviewer, Walt Mossberg, has a tendency to dislike things that compete with Apple devices. (IMHO)
Surface Pro: Hefty Tablet Is a Laptop Lightweight.
(Access may require a subscription.)
A few snips:
"But unlike the first (i.e. the "regular" Surface), this new tablet is capable of running full-featured Windows 8, though at a pricein dollars, bulk and battery life."
"It's too hefty and costly and power-hungry to best the leading tablet, Apple's full-size iPad."
"It lasted just under four hours between chargesless than half the stamina of the iPad on the same test and three hours less than the Surface RT."
"...it's compromised as a laptop. You get fewer ports and less storage than on many laptops and a keyboard that can't compare with those on many laptops."
But on the plus side:
"It ran all the software I threw at itboth the new type and the old desktop typespeedily and well."
The reviewer, Walt Mossberg, has a tendency to dislike things that compete with Apple devices. (IMHO)
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
I've read all the reviews, and I'll still be in line on Saturday to buy one. Even after being burned on the RT, I have faith in the Pro. Engadget called it the best Windows 8 tablet there is, and after using most of them, the bar hasn't been set too high
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Aug 2001
Programs: DL GM, AA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Bonvoy Plat
Posts: 12,171
That is putting it lightly. He's one of the biggest Apple fans out there.
I've read all the reviews, and I'll still be in line on Saturday to buy one. Even after being burned on the RT, I have faith in the Pro. Engadget called it the best Windows 8 tablet there is, and after using most of them, the bar hasn't been set too high
I've read all the reviews, and I'll still be in line on Saturday to buy one. Even after being burned on the RT, I have faith in the Pro. Engadget called it the best Windows 8 tablet there is, and after using most of them, the bar hasn't been set too high

#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LON, ACK, BOS..... (Not necessarily in that order)
Programs: **Mucci Diamond Hairbrush** - compared to that nothing else matters (+BA Bronze)
Posts: 15,938
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,670
Yes, I saw that one last night.
I did read the CNN review and while I agree that "trashed" and "basically hated it" do characterize the review, it did net out to an unfavorable.
Without a hands-on experience, I'd guess the WSJ was probably the closest - a good in-between machine with a few flaws. And one of the flaws being that an in-between machine isn't really great at either.
I think I'd rather have two very good machine (my ultra-portable PC and my iPad) than one device that saves space/weight but isn't really good at either.
(then again, I use a full DLSR, not a P&S, have separate transport/processor/pre-amp/amplifier vs. CD Player/Receiver, etc.)
I did read the CNN review and while I agree that "trashed" and "basically hated it" do characterize the review, it did net out to an unfavorable.
Without a hands-on experience, I'd guess the WSJ was probably the closest - a good in-between machine with a few flaws. And one of the flaws being that an in-between machine isn't really great at either.
I think I'd rather have two very good machine (my ultra-portable PC and my iPad) than one device that saves space/weight but isn't really good at either.
(then again, I use a full DLSR, not a P&S, have separate transport/processor/pre-amp/amplifier vs. CD Player/Receiver, etc.)
#14
Original Poster




Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Programs: VS Silver
Posts: 2,478
I've got an iPhone, an iPad and a PC laptop. I use them all for different things and I see virtually no applications for them in the gaps between. About all I can think of is playing Angry Birds on your laptop. The things I can't do on my iPad that I would like to do involve the use of a mouse (writing DTP and PowerPoint), and apparently that's one of the worst things about the Surface Pro.
#15


Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: No single airline or hotel chain is of much use to me anymore.
Posts: 3,790
This is sort of a "Good Man, Bad Wizard" situation.
If you evaluate the Surface products as a PC tablet, it is among the better ones.
If you evaluate the Surface products as a PC laptop, well... it just isn't one.
The keyboard/kickstand is little more than a novelty,
We have a bunch of the Asus VivoTab and its keyboard is a much more elegant solution. Although only Atom based. And from what I can see the keyboards are rarely not attached.
If you evaluate the Surface products as a PC tablet, it is among the better ones.
If you evaluate the Surface products as a PC laptop, well... it just isn't one.
The keyboard/kickstand is little more than a novelty,
We have a bunch of the Asus VivoTab and its keyboard is a much more elegant solution. Although only Atom based. And from what I can see the keyboards are rarely not attached.

