![]() |
Originally Posted by milepig
(Post 13125890)
So, where does all this leave the poor little orphan G1 - which was marketed as the "Google Phone" not all that long ago?
Personally, I can't wait until the day my contract is up so I can toss my G1 off Navy Pier into Lake Michigan, but I don't have a clear path toward what's next. I salivate over the Iphone and actually bought an I-Pod touch to tide me over - imagine real outlook mail that works out of the box instead of struggling with a 3rd party app! - but I cannot abide the thought of moving to ATT. The NEW Google phone still sounds like an IPhone wannabe. If I were you, and email is important, go Blackberry. The new BB Bold 9700 is great. |
Originally Posted by gfunkdave
(Post 13126291)
If I were you, and email is important, go Blackberry. The new BB Bold 9700 is great.
I'm on the Storm 2 now, and will look at N1 when it comes out on VZW. Also, partially because HTC is the phone maker, and I believe HTC is a company to watch, as they are making some great phones right now. I played with their HD2 in Europe a few months ago and it is VERY impressive. |
I was about to pull the trigger since I have been thinking about a touch screen phone. I was playing with a friends iphone and like the interface, but have never been a fan of Apple. I thought I was out of contract with AT&T, but just called and am stuck until April. Oh well, I guess that will prevent me from "shiny new toy" syndrome for now.
|
Looks great. Now just have to wait to come on Verizon.
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/te...ef=todayspaper
NYT says it's not exactly the 'next coming' of cellular devices. If I have to endure TM's network, I'll pass until it casts a wider net. For now, my combo of Bold 9700 and iPhone work swell for me. Sure, looks are important, but they're meaningless if the phone isn't compatible with a variety of networks. BN |
Originally Posted by BenjaminNicholas
(Post 13127969)
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/te...ef=todayspaper
Sure, looks are important, but they're meaningless if the phone isn't compatible with a variety of networks. BN |
I've been using a Nexus One in New Zealand on Vodafone NZ's network. It's worked quite nicely.
|
OK. So I have had an evening to play with this thing a bit. Frankly I am a little bit disappointed. But it is more due to what appears to be the limitations of Android than this particular phone. I thought I was going to be able to simply go to the browser, pop in the URL, and voila, I would be able to listen to streaming web radio. But it is not so simple. That was one of the main reasons I bought this thing so I am kinda bummed. There are apps that have some stations preset. But I guess the ones I want to hear aren't the right format (requiring flash player or WMA). And you SOL if you want to listen to most of the BBC.
The touch screen is a little finicky. And the "back" button doesn't work consistently. Part of this may be my learning curve. I have an old cellphone that I hardly ever use. So I am coming to this whole world of smartphones cold. But I am not a luddite by any means. I just never felt the need to be constantly available by phone. I don't make a lot of calls. At this point I have just been using it connected to my wifi network. But I guess I will need to decide what sort of T-Mobile plan to get. I may just do a data only plan. |
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 13126472)
Good call. The only reason I don't have a Bold is because it's on AT&T only, and I am happy with Verizon.
|
Originally Posted by BenjaminNicholas
(Post 13127969)
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/te...ef=todayspaper
NYT says it's not exactly the 'next coming' of cellular devices. If I have to endure TM's network, I'll pass until it casts a wider net. For now, my combo of Bold 9700 and iPhone work swell for me. I have had T-Mobile for 9 years now and rarely had a problem with them. |
Uproar on Engadget
Quite a few people have family plans and cant get this phone.
Loyal tmo people are pissed, myself included. We are all out of contract, willing to change plans, sign a new 2 year contract but tmo/google will not offer subsidized pricing or guarantee we can port our numbers to the new phone. Tmo/Google FAIL..... |
Originally Posted by rebadc
(Post 13133997)
Quite a few people have family plans and cant get this phone.
Loyal tmo people are pissed, myself included. We are all out of contract, willing to change plans, sign a new 2 year contract but tmo/google will not offer subsidized pricing or guarantee we can port our numbers to the new phone. Tmo/Google FAIL..... |
Originally Posted by gfunkdave
(Post 13126291)
The Nexus One's specs are almost universally better than those of the iPhone 3GS, except onboard memory.
If I were you, and email is important, go Blackberry. The new BB Bold 9700 is great. |
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 13126472)
Good call. The only reason I don't have a Bold is because it's on AT&T only, and I am happy with Verizon.
Originally Posted by sapman986
(Post 13135147)
At your suggestion, I looked at the Bold 9700. Great phone. I ordered one.
|
total cost of ownership comparison (iphone 3gs, palm pre, moto droid, google nexus one)
http://www.billshrink.com/blog/nexus...-of-ownership/ I believe that the nexus one is unlocked no matter which price you choose to buy it at, so that's something to consider as well, especially to frequent international travelers willing to use a local sim when traveling. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:20 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.