FlyerTalk Wireless Problems/Feedback Thread
Jan 27, 2006 | 7:58 am
#16
Join Date: Jun 2002
Programs: LH SEN, HH Dia
Posts: 536
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; SHARP/WS003SH; PPC; 480x640) Opera 8.50 [en])
Works fine here, too, when I use Opera.
Does not work with Pocket IE though. The The useragent is already registered at wiforums.net.
Works fine here, too, when I use Opera.
Does not work with Pocket IE though. The The useragent is already registered at wiforums.net.
Jan 27, 2006 | 9:11 am
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by demiurg
[SIZE=1]Does not work with Pocket IE though. The The useragent is already registered at wiforums.net.
Jan 27, 2006 | 10:53 am
#18
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA; Kerry Ireland
Programs: AA EXP 1mm; DL Plt; Marriott Gold; Hyatt something or other; Hilton Gold
Posts: 761
works fine on a Treo - but seems a bit tough to navigate a lenghty thread (too many pages to load, one after another), though that is to be expected...thanks FT!
Jan 27, 2006 | 3:45 pm
#19
Join Date: Jun 2002
Programs: LH SEN, HH Dia
Posts: 536
Originally Posted by Tim at WebFlyer
Can anyone confirm? I would be surprised if it did not work at all, I thought I had read that it worked some, but had some display problems in Pocket IE because of some non standards compliance within P. IE.
However, I just checked the useragent string and it seems pretty generic and does not seem to reflect anything specific about the device: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320)
Jan 27, 2006 | 4:01 pm
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by demiurg
BTW, the device is a MDA PRO (aka UTC Universal, Qtek 9000, PDA IV, XDA Exec, Imate Jasjar). I was redirected to the wireless help page. Perhaps this is due to the fact that this device is the first with Windows Mobile 5.0 and has a VGA resolution?
However, I just checked the useragent string and it seems pretty generic and does not seem to reflect anything specific about the device: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320)
However, I just checked the useragent string and it seems pretty generic and does not seem to reflect anything specific about the device: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320)
http://wiforums.net/mime.php
Jan 27, 2006 | 6:54 pm
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by demiurg
BTW, the device is a MDA PRO (aka UTC Universal, Qtek 9000, PDA IV, XDA Exec, Imate Jasjar). I was redirected to the wireless help page. Perhaps this is due to the fact that this device is the first with Windows Mobile 5.0 and has a VGA resolution?
However, I just checked the useragent string and it seems pretty generic and does not seem to reflect anything specific about the device: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320)
However, I just checked the useragent string and it seems pretty generic and does not seem to reflect anything specific about the device: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320)
FWIW; opera on a JasJar and K-Jam works fine.
Jan 28, 2006 | 5:10 am
#24
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by Tim at WebFlyer
Can anyone confirm? I would be surprised if it did not work at all, I thought I had read that it worked some, but had some display problems in Pocket IE because of some non standards compliance within P. IE.
On the wiforums.net/mime.php it says "The browser information for your particular WiDevice has already been submitted to the WiForums Device Compatibility Support Team"
Jan 28, 2006 | 5:41 am
#26
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Zurich and Sausalito
Programs: UA 1P, SPG Plat
Posts: 827
Does not work with Dell Axim X50v, which uses Windows Mobile 2003.
fduvall
fduvall
Originally Posted by Tim at WebFlyer
Can anyone confirm? I would be surprised if it did not work at all, I thought I had read that it worked some, but had some display problems in Pocket IE because of some non standards compliance within P. IE.
Jan 28, 2006 | 7:55 am
#27
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: lapsed UA 1K (now a lowly 2P), HGP Platinum
Posts: 9,607
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry7280/4.0.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
Well, it does work like a charm if you mean like a tiny ornament.
. It looks great, but I think reading posts one per page would end up being more annoying than slow page loads. What would really be cool is a way to set long pages for thread pages and fast, wap pages to navigate around with.
Either way, thanks for keeping up with the cool stuff!
Well, it does work like a charm if you mean like a tiny ornament.
. It looks great, but I think reading posts one per page would end up being more annoying than slow page loads. What would really be cool is a way to set long pages for thread pages and fast, wap pages to navigate around with. Either way, thanks for keeping up with the cool stuff!
Jan 29, 2006 | 2:47 am
#29
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Earth
Programs: UA MM Platinum; HH Diamond
Posts: 1,536
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; Nokia 6600/4.09.1; 6329) Opera 8.00 [en-US])
This is MUCH better. 1000% improvement in readability and speed.
I agree it would be nice to have 5-10 posts display per page, instead of just one.
This is MUCH better.
1000% improvement in readability and speed.I agree it would be nice to have 5-10 posts display per page, instead of just one.