Google Ads Now Appearing Inside A Post?
Jul 16, 2005 | 7:22 am
#61
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: RST
Programs: Delta Diamond; Hilton Diamond; Accor Gold
Posts: 4,844
Originally Posted by iwillflytheworld
This works only on Windows (AFAIK). Go to the folder
...
...
This makes FT a much more pleasant experience. Since I never click on the ads, FT will not loose ad revenue on my behalf. I would support an enhanced FT version free of ads. I really think that the "ad gurus" at FT have pushed this a bit to far.
I understand the need for revenue generation from ads but it seems to me that the ads were running FT not the other way around.
Jul 16, 2005 | 1:41 pm
#62
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 18,244
Originally Posted by civicmon
i can't wait to pay for an ad-free version to rid myself of this trash.
it's so annoying... it'll backfire too, since enough people are upset about it.
it's so annoying... it'll backfire too, since enough people are upset about it.
Jul 16, 2005 | 1:46 pm
#63
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
Clearly the reaction the administrators are hoping for. Or am I just being cynical?
Really, I don't smell any kind of conspiracy here, there is no way Randy is pulling this so he can "force" us to move to the paid version...
Jul 16, 2005 | 1:47 pm
#64
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
Clearly the reaction the administrators are hoping for. Or am I just being cynical?
Not a bad strategy, except it alienates your users and makes us lose respect for the entire enterprise who thought FT was above this nonsense.
Jul 16, 2005 | 2:38 pm
#65
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,351
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
Absolutely not. I believe the goal is to irritate everyone enough so that they'll fork over dough for the ad-free version of FT. The revenue from that will easily surpass whatever they're getting from the ads now.
Not a bad strategy, except it alienates your users and makes us lose respect for the entire enterprise who thought FT was above this nonsense.
Well, I have via the helpful posts of some tech savvy FT'ers done the 'hosts' edit which took even doofus me a few minutes, and I see no ads. And very clearly lots of others are doing that too.
Seeing there is NO option (yet) to get a paid version (which I have been advocating for a year as the ads increased in number and style and annoyance levels) I just wonder if there might be a lot of FT'ers who now will see no need to subscribe to that service when it inevitably comes on stream. As they have been literally forced to take action already to block them.
Bad timing for these new ads to come along and REALLY irritate everyone on FT it seems before the opt-out paid version rolled out. Reading the posts as I just have in 5 forums about these, seems everyone that sees them hates them. 'Straw that broke the Camel's back reaction' it looks very much like to me.
Jul 16, 2005 | 4:31 pm
#66
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Northeast MA, USA.
Programs: HHonors Diamond, DL Silver, TSA Harassee
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by ozstamps
Interesting thought.
Well, I have via the helpful posts of some tech savvy FT'ers done the 'hosts' edit which took even doofus me a few minutes, and I see no ads. And very clearly lots of others are doing that too.
Seeing there is NO option (yet) to get a paid version (which I have been advocating for a year as the ads increased in number and style and annoyance levels) I just wonder if there might be a lot of FT'ers who now will see no need to subscribe to that service when it inevitably comes on stream. As they have been literally forced to take action already to block them.
Bad timing for these new ads to come along and REALLY irritate everyone on FT it seems before the opt-out paid version rolled out. Reading the posts as I just have in 5 forums about these, seems everyone that sees them hates them. 'Straw that broke the Camel's back reaction' it looks very much like to me.
Well, I have via the helpful posts of some tech savvy FT'ers done the 'hosts' edit which took even doofus me a few minutes, and I see no ads. And very clearly lots of others are doing that too.
Seeing there is NO option (yet) to get a paid version (which I have been advocating for a year as the ads increased in number and style and annoyance levels) I just wonder if there might be a lot of FT'ers who now will see no need to subscribe to that service when it inevitably comes on stream. As they have been literally forced to take action already to block them.
Bad timing for these new ads to come along and REALLY irritate everyone on FT it seems before the opt-out paid version rolled out. Reading the posts as I just have in 5 forums about these, seems everyone that sees them hates them. 'Straw that broke the Camel's back reaction' it looks very much like to me.
Jul 16, 2005 | 6:24 pm
#67
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,598
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
Absolutely not. I believe the goal is to irritate everyone enough so that they'll fork over dough for the ad-free version of FT. The revenue from that will easily surprass whatever they're getting from the ads now.
Not a bad strategy, except it alienates your users and makes us lose respect for the entire enterprise who thought FT was above this nonsense.
Not a bad strategy, except it alienates your users and makes us lose respect for the entire enterprise who thought FT was above this nonsense.
I see the complaining about possibly paying for something has already started.
Jul 16, 2005 | 6:44 pm
#68
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DCA
Programs: AMC MovieWatcher, Giant BonusCard, Petco PALS Card, Silver Diner Blue Plate Club
Posts: 22,314
I don't think Randy is too worried about how he'll get folks to pay, he's already said that ad-free FT will come with any of the other services he offers, which means (at current pricing) it'll be as cheap as $12/yr for an online InsideFlyer subscription.
That's alot less than just about everyone has said they'd be willing to pay.
Plus you get something on top of it (magazine content, award redemption help, whichever you opt for).
Besides, I fully take Randy at his word that the current ads aren't a conscious direction he's wanted to go, he faults the ad agency for bringing the site to this point. As many have observed here, the ad campaigns that have been running are more often than not poorly targeted to the audience so the click-through rates are low. And he's said he's going to look into the whole thing, that he hadn't even really noticed since he surfs in ad-free mode.
Enough with the conspiracy theories. I think opinions have been heard in this (and other) thread(s).
^
That's alot less than just about everyone has said they'd be willing to pay.
Plus you get something on top of it (magazine content, award redemption help, whichever you opt for).
Besides, I fully take Randy at his word that the current ads aren't a conscious direction he's wanted to go, he faults the ad agency for bringing the site to this point. As many have observed here, the ad campaigns that have been running are more often than not poorly targeted to the audience so the click-through rates are low. And he's said he's going to look into the whole thing, that he hadn't even really noticed since he surfs in ad-free mode.
Enough with the conspiracy theories. I think opinions have been heard in this (and other) thread(s).
^
Jul 16, 2005 | 9:58 pm
#69
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,857
That ....... works really nicely 
I'd be willing to pay for FT, when the option is available.
For now, I shall be ad-blocking for all web sites now that I have it, its pretty spiffy.
I'd be willing to pay for FT, when the option is available.
For now, I shall be ad-blocking for all web sites now that I have it, its pretty spiffy.
Jul 16, 2005 | 10:23 pm
#70
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
Originally Posted by gleff
Besides, I fully take Randy at his word that the current ads aren't a conscious direction he's wanted to go, he faults the ad agency for bringing the site to this point. As many have observed here, the ad campaigns that have been running are more often than not poorly targeted to the audience so the click-through rates are low. And he's said he's going to look into the whole thing, that he hadn't even really noticed since he surfs in ad-free mode.
Enough with the conspiracy theories. I think opinions have been heard in this (and other) thread(s).
Enough with the conspiracy theories. I think opinions have been heard in this (and other) thread(s).
Jul 17, 2005 | 2:06 pm
#71
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LAX
Programs: UA MM, DL DM
Posts: 419
I'm sure Randy will do a simple cost/benefit analysis on the new ads and make his decision accordingly. At the end of the day, Flyertalk is a business so I'm not sure why folks take this stuff so personally.
I actually hadn't even noticed the ads - I've been playing on the internet so long that my little brain just filters them out on its own. I can't remember ever clicking on ad.
That said, I do appreciate the pointer towards ....... with which I now happily zap ads - particularly on my laptop which I occasionally have to use (gasp) dial-up while traveling.
I actually hadn't even noticed the ads - I've been playing on the internet so long that my little brain just filters them out on its own. I can't remember ever clicking on ad.
That said, I do appreciate the pointer towards ....... with which I now happily zap ads - particularly on my laptop which I occasionally have to use (gasp) dial-up while traveling.
Jul 18, 2005 | 10:45 pm
#72
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silver Spring, and Eastern Shore Md. USA
Programs: AA EXP, UA MM/Premier Gold, Hyatt Globalist,Hilton Honors Gold, IHG platinum, Club Carlson Gold
Posts: 1,060
thanks, your guidance worked like a charm!!!
Originally Posted by iwillflytheworld
This works only on Windows (AFAIK). Go to the folder
C:\windows\system32\drivers\etc
(This is the default folder on Win XP. Could be different in your system. You can also just search for a file called "hosts").
There should be a file called "hosts" (no extension); if there isn't one, create it. Edit the file with notepad. Add those two lines. Restart your computer. Voila, all ads gone .
I also want to voice my opposition, and this makes me LESS likely to pay for an ad-free version.
The admins and Randy should keep in mind that FTers are an educated bunch who can learn to block the ads if needed. On the other hand, most of us would he happy to support FT. I think that directly asking to contribute by donating some money and/or clicking some discrete ads would be far more productive than this obnoxious advertisements.
C:\windows\system32\drivers\etc
(This is the default folder on Win XP. Could be different in your system. You can also just search for a file called "hosts").
There should be a file called "hosts" (no extension); if there isn't one, create it. Edit the file with notepad. Add those two lines. Restart your computer. Voila, all ads gone
.I also want to voice my opposition, and this makes me LESS likely to pay for an ad-free version.
The admins and Randy should keep in mind that FTers are an educated bunch who can learn to block the ads if needed. On the other hand, most of us would he happy to support FT. I think that directly asking to contribute by donating some money and/or clicking some discrete ads would be far more productive than this obnoxious advertisements.
I followed your instructions on locating the "hosts"file, cut and paste the two lines of code in the notepad there and
VOILA--good bye google!!!!!
THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jul 18, 2005 | 10:50 pm
#73
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Daly City, CA
Programs: 1P lusting for 1K
Posts: 263
I did the same thing. There was no hosts file so I created one.
No luck, didn't work for me.
Better go back and read the instructions again.
No luck, didn't work for me.
Better go back and read the instructions again.
Last edited by jacksf; Jul 18, 2005 at 10:52 pm Reason: No special reason.
Jul 19, 2005 | 6:40 pm
#74
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Niceville, FL, USA
Posts: 2,792
Quite frankly, I'd be more than happy to pay for a subscription to FT.
Ads or no ads, this is the one site that I would pay for. I do not pay for any other sites, but this one I would. As has been said, Randy has laid out a lot of money for this place for us, and it is a valuable resource.
So say the word, Randy, and I'll be sending over my charge card #----of course, you DO realize that it will be a mile- or points-earning card, right??
Ads or no ads, this is the one site that I would pay for. I do not pay for any other sites, but this one I would. As has been said, Randy has laid out a lot of money for this place for us, and it is a valuable resource.
So say the word, Randy, and I'll be sending over my charge card #----of course, you DO realize that it will be a mile- or points-earning card, right??