FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Technical Support and Feedback (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/technical-support-feedback-386/)
-   -   Feedback on FT new style, March 2018 (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/technical-support-feedback/1900802-feedback-ft-new-style-march-2018-a.html)

pvn Apr 11, 2018 2:42 pm


Originally Posted by beltway (Post 29629441)
I forget whether others have pointed it out before, but having huge tracts of bright whitespace also uses more power & thus reduces the usage time for a single battery charge. Right?

this sounds like a wives tale. the screen is backlit, the light uses the same power whether the LCD is white or black.

reducing your screen brightness can help, but that's a different issue.

Globaliser Apr 11, 2018 3:27 pm


Originally Posted by pvn (Post 29629647)
People may on occasion find something useful in one but on net they are spammy and the negatives far outweigh the positives.

Good - at least we're now making some progress from "universally of negative value".

If you don't like them, FT provides you with a handy way of switching them off.

pvn Apr 11, 2018 3:40 pm

But the default is for them to be on, which is wasting electrons and time every time pages load. Admittedly, it's a small amount, but over time it adds up. They're slowly killing the planet.

When was the last time you personally clicked on a link in someone else's signature for an actually productive reason?

pvn Apr 11, 2018 3:41 pm

And yes, "universally of negative value" may have been hyperbolic, but just a tiny bit, and certainly less so than "so many others find value in the information contained in them"

jackal Apr 11, 2018 3:41 pm


Originally Posted by Globaliser (Post 29629814)
Good - at least we're now making some progress from "universally of negative value".

If you don't like them, FT provides you with a handy way of switching them off.

I vote that IB remove the option to turn signatures off. ;)

EsherFlyer Apr 11, 2018 3:52 pm

I think this could be said of the content above the signature as well, so to paraphrase:


Originally Posted by pvn (Post 29629647)
People [post messages] because they have an overly inflated sense of self-importance.

People may on occasion find something useful in one but on net they are spammy and the negatives far outweigh the positives.

I wouldn't agree with your original or the above overall. Accepting that we each place the boundary at different levels means that I can forgive the DYKWIA, etc posts because there are some useful ones to counter balance them. As it happens I've never noticed a sig that I felt was annoying, etc...

IBobi Apr 11, 2018 4:11 pm

Guys, this is a tech support thread for feedback on the new style changes. Please stay on topic. Extraneous posts still need to be read by me and Joel and... we'd frankly rather just fix stuff.

IBobi Apr 11, 2018 4:12 pm


Originally Posted by EsherFlyer (Post 29629417)
[MENTION=359244]IBobi[/MENTION], This is still making the PC version hard to use for me :(.

I've lost track of what exactly the issue was here?

EsherFlyer Apr 11, 2018 4:32 pm


Originally Posted by IBobi (Post 29629963)
I've lost track of what exactly the issue was here?

I trimmed the images from the quote, but if you jump back to the quoted post you'll see screenshots of a smaller font being used for search results than for forum thread lists.

IBobi Apr 11, 2018 4:36 pm


Originally Posted by EsherFlyer (Post 29630022)
I trimmed the images from the quote, but if you jump back to the quoted post you'll see screenshots of a smaller font being used for search results than for forum thread lists.

Per IBjoel, tech are already (still) working on font issues. Let's wait to see how that settles before asking them for more -- it may well just get fixed.

adobbing Apr 11, 2018 4:40 pm


Originally Posted by IBobi (Post 29629959)
Guys, this is a tech support thread for feedback on the new style changes. Please stay on topic. Extraneous posts still need to be read by me and Joel and... we'd frankly rather just fix stuff.

please can you revert to the format used previously, this new format is hideous and virtually impossible to use on an iPhone?

IBobi Apr 11, 2018 6:52 pm


Originally Posted by adobbing (Post 29630044)


please can you revert to the format used previously, this new format is hideous and virtually impossible to use on an iPhone?

Try the mobile skin please.

SkiAdcock Apr 11, 2018 8:00 pm

Is it really that hard to make the page # that one is on more distinguishable from the others? Brighter, different color, something. I'm referring to the #s at the bottom on a multi-page thread.

Cheers.

adobbing Apr 12, 2018 12:04 am


Originally Posted by IBobi (Post 29630351)
Try the mobile skin please.

I’ve tried both and they’re both awful and unusable!

Why can’t you listen to the feedback and just revert to something that worked?

jt82 Apr 12, 2018 1:17 am


Originally Posted by adobbing (Post 29631015)


I’ve tried both and they’re both awful and unusable!

Why can’t you listen to the feedback and just revert to something that worked?

I briefly looked at the forums on my phone at work yesterday, and if anything they're both better than the current desktop offering, as I use a mobile layout at present for precisely zero websites that tells you how bad I think the new desktop redesigns have been


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.