Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Southwest Airlines | Rapid Rewards
Reload this Page >

SWA Pilots Accused of Placing Camera in Airplane Lav.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SWA Pilots Accused of Placing Camera in Airplane Lav.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2019, 9:54 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cockeysville, MD
Programs: Marriott Rewards Lifetime Titanium, Amex Plat, Hertz Gold 5*, National Exec, AA Plat
Posts: 9,468
SWA Pilots Accused of Placing Camera in Airplane Lav.

Couldn't find this reported anywhere in the forum. Details are very disturbing if true. Especially attempts to cover it up and that the pilots are still flying.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/southwest...004825450.html

Last edited by Mr. Vker; Oct 25, 2019 at 11:37 pm
Mr. Vker is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2019, 11:31 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: ONT
Programs: AA Gold, WN A-, UA S, HH ♦, IHG Spire, Hertz Prez O, TSA Disparager
Posts: 2,159
This is horrific and I hope there is enough evidence to hang the pilots out to dry.
Silver Fox likes this.
Michael El is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2019, 11:47 pm
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Originally Posted by Michael El
This is horrific and I hope there is enough evidence to hang the pilots out to dry.
Let's add to the list the managers who harassed the FA who reported it (and her husband) rather than taking action to fix the problem, hopefully by terminating the pilots and reporting the incident to law enforcement and the FAA. Just in terms of safety, this seems a lot worse than texting while driving a car; these guys should never be allowed in a cockpit again.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 5:53 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 349
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
, this seems a lot worse than texting while driving a car; these guys should never be allowed in a cockpit again.
Agreed. Hopefully the facts will be put out there in full, and if they were actually recording people in the lav they should be sent to jail - especially if they were livestreaming it to the depths of the internet hellscape.

If this all turns out to be true I'd expect massive lawsuits from any others that had their privacy invaded in this disgusting way.
Silver Fox likes this.
Nirvana91 is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 6:41 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 11,074
Wow - based on what has been reported, if true - well.... they only flying they will do will be with federal marshalls.
NoStressHere is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 8:17 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,514
Originally Posted by NoStressHere
Wow - based on what has been reported, if true - well.... they only flying they will do will be with federal marshalls.
I'm more interested in the managers who allegedly made her life miserable.

Same-day crewmates spoken to by the pilots, photo of the iPad she took and any documented harassment would be hard to rebut.

Why didn't SWA settle this?
LegalTender is online now  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 8:27 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 11,074
Originally Posted by LegalTender
I'm more interested in the managers who allegedly made her life miserable.

Same-day crewmates spoken to by the pilots, photo of the iPad she took and any documented harassment would be hard to rebut.

Why didn't SWA settle this?
You make a very good point.

Quote from news story : "...flight attendant has sued the airline, accusing the carrier of retaliation after she reported two pilots..."

I often wonder if there is another side to just about every story we read but hard to imagine there would be an issue here. Something just does not add up.
NoStressHere is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 10:03 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,872
Originally Posted by NoStressHere
You make a very good point.

Quote from news story : "...flight attendant has sued the airline, accusing the carrier of retaliation after she reported two pilots..."

I often wonder if there is another side to just about every story we read but hard to imagine there would be an issue here. Something just does not add up.
Agree..somethin' ain't right here.
smmrfld is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 12:35 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 276
Seems to me that the FAs have provided clear enough information. They submitted the report and asked management to investigate immediately and before allowing the pilots to continue flying and tempering the evidence. The management could call the police at the time and go to the lav and find the camera and it will be black and white.

It seems to me to be a bigger indictment on the company than the pilots. Unfortunately they will just have bigger fare sales and people will just continue flying them, except using the lav. It just shows that the company has lost what made it great before, and just become another discarding all rules, money driven corporation.
fttc is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 12:52 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,286
Yikes.
ursine1 is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 1:42 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 11,074
Originally Posted by fttc
Seems to me that the FAs have provided clear enough information. They submitted the report and asked management to investigate immediately and before allowing the pilots to continue flying and tempering the evidence. The management could call the police at the time and go to the lav and find the camera and it will be black and white.

It seems to me to be a bigger indictment on the company than the pilots. Unfortunately they will just have bigger fare sales and people will just continue flying them, except using the lav. It just shows that the company has lost what made it great before, and just become another discarding all rules, money driven corporation.
If the pilots were smart, the camera was removed.

Depending on exactly HOW and WHEN the incident was reported, the airline may be in a tough position to investigate. And too late for law enforcement to get involved. The article I read did not indicate the timing of the report.

Hard to say how much blame to put on the company vs the individuals with what little we can see at this point.

Assuming this is some major change in how the company operates is a big jump. Or that lavs are no longer safe to use.
nancypants likes this.
NoStressHere is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 1:51 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,872
Originally Posted by fttc
It seems to me to be a bigger indictment on the company than the pilots. Unfortunately they will just have bigger fare sales and people will just continue flying them, except using the lav. It just shows that the company has lost what made it great before, and just become another discarding all rules, money driven corporation.
This is wildly off-base and inaccurate, IMO.
kennycrudup likes this.
smmrfld is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 1:55 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 276
Yes, the camera was removed afterwards, so the pilots are now arguing innocence.

TPG has a pretty detailed write up. From FAs' story, the 4 FAs filed written report together after landing in PHX (the FA did also take some picture of the live stream), and asked management to prevent the pilots from flying the next leg (so that they wouldn't have a chance to temper the evidence). But the management refused, thus the pilots were able to fly the next leg and the evidence is gone. Seems to me that part is pretty cut and dry to me, and it's enough say the company is rotten deeper than a couple of illegal pilots.
fttc is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 1:57 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 276
Originally Posted by smmrfld
This is wildly off-base and inaccurate, IMO.
Which part? The first or the second part or both?

What's your opinion then?
fttc is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2019, 2:00 pm
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cockeysville, MD
Programs: Marriott Rewards Lifetime Titanium, Amex Plat, Hertz Gold 5*, National Exec, AA Plat
Posts: 9,468
Originally Posted by fttc
Yes, the camera was removed afterwards, so the pilots are now arguing innocence.

TPG has a pretty detailed write up. From FAs' story, the 4 FAs filed written report together after landing in PHX (the FA did also take some picture of the live stream), and asked management to prevent the pilots from flying the next leg (so that they wouldn't have a chance to temper the evidence). But the management refused, thus the pilots were able to fly the next leg and the evidence is gone. Seems to me that part is pretty cut and dry to me, and it's enough say the company is rotten deeper than a couple of illegal pilots.

https://thepointsguy.com/news/southw...raft-lavatory/
Mr. Vker is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.