Bizarre WN fares
#17
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
Looking at Southwest pricing I do see a lot of gaming going on from the Company. One of the features I used to like about Southwest was predictability. That now seems out the window.
Southwest seems to have adopted a strategy of pricing tickets based on ultimate demand. That is if a flight is likely to completely sell out, then very few or no low cost seats are made available. As other carriers raise their prices Southwest skims off some high dollar fares. That is a valid strategy, but it does not lead to customer loyalty.
I have been checking on some holiday travel and almost without exception Southwest is at least $100 per trip higher than Delta or AA. On the flights where Southwest is lower it is rarely lower than by more than $30-40 even allowing for a bag fee. I have also experienced that some routes I fly the average fare I paid has increased by 60-70 % over the last two years, largely due to decreased promotional fares.
Southwest seems to have adopted a strategy of pricing tickets based on ultimate demand. That is if a flight is likely to completely sell out, then very few or no low cost seats are made available. As other carriers raise their prices Southwest skims off some high dollar fares. That is a valid strategy, but it does not lead to customer loyalty.
I have been checking on some holiday travel and almost without exception Southwest is at least $100 per trip higher than Delta or AA. On the flights where Southwest is lower it is rarely lower than by more than $30-40 even allowing for a bag fee. I have also experienced that some routes I fly the average fare I paid has increased by 60-70 % over the last two years, largely due to decreased promotional fares.
Last edited by rsteinmetz70112; May 27, 2014 at 9:53 am
#18
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Tucson AZ
Programs: Global Entry, United Silver, Marriott Platinum Premier, Hilton Gold
Posts: 380
Southwest seems to have adopted a strategy of pricing tickets based on ultimate demand. That is if a flight is likely to completely sell out, then very few on no low cost seats are made available. As other carriers raise their prices Southwest skims off some high dollar fares. That is a valid strategy, but it does not lead to customer loyalty.
I've been traveling for work purposes for a long, long time and like to be loyal to one airline. Years ago when I was traveling mostly abroad I focused on United. In return, United treated me pretty well -- frequent free upgrades, better seat availability, lounge membership, etc. Now that my travel is mostly domestic, I've ended up focusing on Southwest and I'm not feeling anything coming from Southwest to maintain my loyalty as a frequent business traveler. The most serious problems for business travel have become high airfares, flight delays, and declining customer service.
Of course, this has to be kept in perspective. Somehow, Southwest's business model seems to be working. Almost every flight is filled to maximum capacity, and many are oversold. Asking them to consider assigned seating and treating business travelers a little better is essentially asking them to fix what ain't broke. I may end up having to switch my loyalty but am fighting the urge to do so.
#19
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
My guess: The other guys are banking on a significant fraction of these customers to change their tickets and incur a $150 fee. Those high change fees go hand in hand with lower prices far in advance of the travel date.
#20
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
Based on my travel habits, I rarely change a flight and the few times I do the cheaper fares would more than offset the fees. However since most changes likely occur close to the travel date Southwest is in effect charging a fee.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458
My family flies WN for two reasons:
1. Companion Pass
2. No charge to cancel/change/rebook/refare
They could be on every OTA in the world and we would still fly them.
Has nothing to do with being brainwashed, and I bet there are a lot of people like me. Not everyone in the world has identical needs, something a lot of FTers don't understand.
1. Companion Pass
2. No charge to cancel/change/rebook/refare
They could be on every OTA in the world and we would still fly them.
Has nothing to do with being brainwashed, and I bet there are a lot of people like me. Not everyone in the world has identical needs, something a lot of FTers don't understand.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicagoland, IL, USA
Programs: WN CP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,192
#24
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
#25
#26
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
Thats not been my experiance.
In past years their fares were competative, even cheap. This year it seems they are increaseing fares massively over previosu years.
Fuel costs cannot account for the difference.
Labor costs are frozen to the consternation of their employees.
In past years their fares were competative, even cheap. This year it seems they are increaseing fares massively over previosu years.
Fuel costs cannot account for the difference.
Labor costs are frozen to the consternation of their employees.
#27
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,832
Thats not been my experiance.
In past years their fares were competative, even cheap. This year it seems they are increaseing fares massively over previosu years.
Fuel costs cannot account for the difference.
Labor costs are frozen to the consternation of their employees.
In past years their fares were competative, even cheap. This year it seems they are increaseing fares massively over previosu years.
Fuel costs cannot account for the difference.
Labor costs are frozen to the consternation of their employees.
Last edited by texashoser; May 28, 2014 at 8:51 am
#28
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Tucson AZ
Programs: Global Entry, United Silver, Marriott Platinum Premier, Hilton Gold
Posts: 380
+1 - agreed. A year ago I could book WN, even a couple of weeks out, and the fare would fit in with most project budgets. Yesterday was the first time that a manager at my company ordered me to use a different airline. Going forward, I'll probably have to compare AA/US with WN before making a booking decision with the company travel agent. WN appears to be gradually pricing themselves out of the market - at least for business travel.
#29
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,832
+1 - agreed. A year ago I could book WN, even a couple of weeks out, and the fare would fit in with most project budgets. Yesterday was the first time that a manager at my company ordered me to use a different airline. Going forward, I'll probably have to compare AA/US with WN before making a booking decision with the company travel agent. WN appears to be gradually pricing themselves out of the market - at least for business travel.
#30
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Tucson AZ
Programs: Global Entry, United Silver, Marriott Platinum Premier, Hilton Gold
Posts: 380
Honestly, I don't think that WN cares one red rip about doing anything substantial to keep frequent business travelers loyal. One thing they could do, which would help to solve this dilemma, is to extend WGA fares a little longer to A-listers so they won't be forced to find another airline. My company and their clients aren't cheap by any means, but when the fares start nearing or exceeding $1000 round trip the project managers start losing their heads.